Table 4: Impact of MTHFR polymorphism on the development of Mullerian duct structures in case group females.
Radiology findings | CC (n = 22) | CT (n = 11) | TT (n = 12) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Uterus | NS | |||
Present (n = 7) | 4 (8.8%) | 2 (4.4%) | 1 (2.2%) | |
Hypoplastic (n = 20) | 9 (20%) | 3 (6.6%) | 8 (17.8%) | |
Absent (n = 18) | 9 (20%) | 6 (13.3%) | 3 (6.6%) | |
Ovaries | 0.024* | |||
Present (n = 21) | 13 (28.9%) | 6 (13.3%) | 2 (2.2%) | |
Streak (n = 9) | 2 (4.4%) | 2 (4.4%) | 5 (11.1%) | |
One absent (n = 4) | 2 (4.4%) | 0 | 2 (4.4%) | |
Both absent (n = 11) | 5 (15.5%) | 3 (6.6%) | 3 (6.6%) | |
Vagina | NS | |||
Present (n = 28) | 15 (33.3%) | 4 (8.8%) | 9 (20%) | |
Small (n = 5) | 2 (4.4%) | 2 (4.4%) | 1 (2.2%) | |
Blind (n = 5) | 3 (6.6%) | 2 (4.4%) | 0 | |
Absent (n = 7) | 2 (4.4%) | 3 (6.6%) | 2 (2.2%) | |
Hymen | NS | |||
Intact (n = 37) | 19 (42.2%) | 9 (20%) | 9 (20%) | |
Imperforated (n = 8) | 3 (6.6%) | 2 (4.4%) | 3 (6.6%) | |
Kidneys | NS | |||
Present (n = 38) | 19 (42.2%) | 8 (17.8%) | 11 (24.4%) | |
One absent one ectopic (n = 4) | 2 (4.4%) | 2 (4.4%) | 0 | |
Both ectopic (n = 1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.2%) | |
One absent (n = 2) | 1 (2.2%) | 1 (2.2%) | 0 | |
Cervix | NS | NS | ||
Present (n = 24) | 12 (26.7%) | 7 (15.5%) | 5 (11.1%) | |
Small (n = 9) | 5 (11.1%) | 1 (2.2%) | 3 (6.6%) | |
Absent (n = 12) | 5 (11.1%) | 3 (6.6%) | 4 (8.8%) | |