Skip to main content

Assessment of interleukin-6 and cathepsin-B gene expression in breast cancer women

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women globally. Cysteine protease cathepsin-B has been implicated in various human malignancies and is involved in malignancy progression and metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the circulating levels of cathepsin-B, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and CA15-3, a cancer antigen, as biomarkers for tumors in women with both localized and metastatic BC. The study employed a case-control design, enrolling 108 participants categorized into three groups: healthy individuals, those with localized BC, and those with metastatic BC. The relative mRNA expression of cathepsin-B in blood samples was assessed using qRT-PCR. Additionally, serum levels of IL-6 and CA15-3 were quantified using ELISA.

Results

The relative mRNA expression of cathepsin-B, IL-6 levels, and CA15-3 levels were significantly higher in metastatic BC cases than in localized BC cases and the control group (p-value < 0.001). A statistically significant positive correlation was also found between cathepsin-B and both IL-6 and CA15-3 (r = 0.905, r  = 0.667, and p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

The findings indicate a strong correlation between the interaction of the proteolytic enzyme cathepsin-B and IL-6 with the unfavorable prognosis of BC. This relationship may serve as a potential indicator and a promising target for therapy in BC treatment.

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is a major global health concern, with approximately 2.3 million new cases reported annually, accounting for 24.2% of all cancers diagnosed in women, making it the most frequently diagnosed cancer in females [1]. BC accounts for one in four cases in women worldwide and contributes to 15% of mortality, highlighting the need to find new diagnostic biomarkers and approaches to enhance prognosis and lower mortality [1].

Cathepsins are a group of enzymes that break down proteins inside most cells, facilitating cell self-destruction and tissue breakdown. They function optimally in acidic environments, such as lysosomes, and are involved in energy production, protein recycling, and immune response. Cathepsins can modulate the activity of cytokines and chemokines, key mediators of inflammation, and contribute to the regulation of inflammatory processes by controlling the production and release of these signaling molecules [2]. They can be categorized into three groups based on their composition and method of protein cleavage: cysteine cathepsins (including cathepsins B, C, F, H, K, L, O, S, V, W, and X), aspartic cathepsins (such as cathepsins D and E), and serine cathepsins (comprising cathepsins A and G) [3]. Cathepsins promote BC by aiding tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis through the degradation of the extracellular matrix and activation of other enzymes [4]. Although not all categories of cathepsins are associated with BC, cathepsin B, L, S, and D have been linked to BC progression due to their proteolytic activity and involvement in various cellular processes that support tumor development [5].

Cathepsin-B, located on chromosome 8 (8p22), has been proposed as an effective biomarker for various malignancies [6]. The overexpression of cathepsin-B has been observed in numerous types of malignancies, including prostate and pancreatic tumors, melanoma, and kidney carcinoma, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic target. Decreased cathepsin-B expression has been shown to reduce the aggressiveness of glioma, osteosarcoma, and mammary cancer cells [7].

Mechanistically, cathepsin-B is localized on the surface of cancer cells, facilitating the initiation of proteolytic cascades that ultimately activate downstream proteases, such as urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), pro-matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and -9, which degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) constituents and adhesion particles, including E-cadherin [8].

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine composed of 184 amino acids. It has been demonstrated that IL-6 increases aromatase expression in adipose tissue, leading to increased estrogen production and enhanced breast cancer development. Moreover, IL-6 activates multiple signaling pathways to increase cathepsin-B expression [9, 10].

In human gingival fibroblasts, for example, IL-6 and soluble-IL-6-receptor (sIL-6R) induce the construction of cathepsin-B and cathepsin-L through a pathway involving the c-Jun N-terminal kinase-activator protein-1 (JNK-AP-1) caveolae. Additionally, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and IL-6 have been shown to intensify the release of cathepsin-B from human osteoblasts [11, 12].

CA15-3 is a marker that can help predict the outcome of BC patients and has been extensively studied recently. CA15-3 is a type of mucin, a glycoprotein produced by the MUC-1 gene, and is found on the surface of numerous categories of normal epithelial tissues, including the breast [13]. CA15-3 may be useful for determining the extent of BC spread. After metastatic BC therapy, CA15-3 measurement can be used to monitor disease recurrence. An increase in CA15-3 levels may indicate therapy failure in the absence of detectable disease [14].

Cathepsin-B, IL-6, and CA15-3 are all implicated in the promotion of BC by enhancing tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis [8]. CA15-3 can affect the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α [15]. IL-6 can also stimulate the expression of cathepsin-B in BC cells, creating a self-reinforcing cycle that drives tumor progression [16]. Cathepsin-B plays a crucial role in tumor progression by degrading the extracellular matrix, which allows cancer cells to invade and metastasize. It also activates pro-angiogenic factors, promoting the formation of new blood vessels that supply the tumor with oxygen and nutrients [17].

This study explored the expression levels of cathepsin-B, IL-6, and CA15-3 in the blood of BC cases. Additionally, it examined the correlation between the expression of these markers and various clinicopathological characteristics of the patients.

Methods

Subjects and clinical data

This case-control research included 108 women categorized into three categories: 36 normal control women, 36 female patients having localized BC, and 36 female patients having metastatic BC. The study was conducted at the Medical Biochemistry & Molecular Biology and General Surgery departments of Zagazig University Hospitals, Egypt, between November 2022 and November 2023. The measured sample size was determined using Epi-Tools Epidemiological calculators to assess the statistical robustness of the findings which indicated a minimum power of 87.1% [18]. The patients were non-obese Egyptian females with histopathologically and clinically confirmed BC, aged between 35 and 56 years, who had not undergone chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the pathology and hospital reports. We excluded patients with infectious, inflammatory, autoimmune disorders, or multiple primary tumors, patients with positive BC family history, and those who refused to give consent. The study was authorized by the Zagazig University Institutional Research Board (IRB) (ZU-IRB#10,101/13-11-2022) and conducted according to the ethical guidelines set forth by the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki for human research studies.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

The blood samples underwent treatment with Trizol reagent obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. to extract total RNA. The RNA quality was evaluated by determining the A260/A280 ratio using a NanoDrop® ND–1000 Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies; Wilmington, Delaware, United States) with 1.5 µl of RNA. Subsequently, a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit from Applied Biosystems™, USA, was utilized for cDNA synthesis as per the manufacturer’s guidelines.

Quantitative real-time PCR

To perform real-time RT-PCR using the TOPreal™ qPCR 2X PreMIX (SYBR Green with low ROX) (Cat. # P725 or P750) obtained from Enzynomics, Korea, in an Mx3005P Real-Time PCR System from Agilent Stratagene, USA, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The cycling conditions for qRT-PCR consisted of a primary denaturation step at 95 °C (12 min), then forty cycles of denaturation at 95 °C (20 s), annealing at 60 °C (30 s), and extension at 72 °C (30 s). Oligonucleotide-specific primers were custom-synthesized via Sangon Biotech (Beijing, China). After qRT-PCR amplification, melting curve testing was done. The pursue gene expression levels were standardized to the mRNA expression of human GAPDH using the 2−ΔΔCT method [19]. Primer sequences were as follows: cathepsin-B (forward); 5′-TGT AAT GGT GGC TAT CCT GCT-3′, (reverse); 5′-AGG CTC ACA GAT CTT GCT ACA-3′. GAPDH (forward) 5′-GGA GTC AAC GGA TTT GGT CGT-3′, (reverse); 5′-ACG GTG CCA TGG AAT TTG C-3′.

ELISA assay

The quantities of human IL-6 and CA15-3 in serum were established using new and optimized ELISA kits (Human IL-6 ELISA kit, Bioneovan. Co. Ltd Beijing, China) and (Human CA15-3 ELISA kit, INNOVA BIOTECH CO., LTD) respectively. The analysis was standardized following the constructor’s instructions, and the findings were adjusted to a standard curve.

Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to statistical analysis using IBM’s SPSS software, Version 20.0. For the characterization of quantitative data, the mean, range, median, and standard deviation were employed. For categorical variables, the Chi-square test was utilized, followed by a one-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s post-hoc test for multiple differences among the three groups. All tests conducted were two-tailed. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The studied subjects consisted of 35–56-year-old non-obese females categorized into three groups (control, localized BC, and BC cases with metastasis) with a mean age of 44.3 ± 8.3, 48.5 ± 6.2, and 45.5 ± 7.6, respectively. The clinicopathological attributes of the studied groups are displayed in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinicopathological data of the breast cancer groups

The relative mRNA expression of cathepsin-B was statistically significantly higher in metastatic BC cases than in localized BC cases and in the control group (9.2 ± 2.1 > 5.1 ± 1.8 > 1.1 ± 0.2, p-value < 0.001) (Table 2).

Table 2 Cathepsin-B gene expression among the studied groups

A statistically significant variance was observed among different stages of the tumor regarding cathepsin-B gene expression in both localized BC and metastatic BC groups (p = 0.02). Additionally, cathepsin-B gene expression was significantly higher in patients with lymphatic and distant metastasis than in those with lymph node (LN) metastasis only (p = 0.04) (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation among the clinicopathological data and cathepsin-B relative expression in breast cancer patients

IL-6 and CA15-3 serum levels were statistically significantly higher among the metastatic BC group than the localized BC group and the healthy individuals (9.2 ± 1.6 > 5.4 ± 0.9 > 1.9 ± 0.4) and (30.2 ± 6.8 > 29.4 ± 5.1 > 15.4 ± 2.8), respectively (p-value < 0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4 IL-6 and CA15-3 levels among the studied groups

Among the studied groups, we revealed a statistically significant positive correlation among cathepsin-B and IL-6 & CA15-3 (r = 0.905 & 0.667, respectively, p < 0.001) (Table 5).

Table 5 Correlation between cathepsin-B expression and both IL-6 and CA15-3 among the studied groups

Cathepsin-B at a cutoff point of ≥ 1.4 can be used as a significant predictor for the occurrence of BC with a sensitivity of 95.8% and specificity of 94.4%. Additionally, at a cutoff point of ≥ 6.1, it can be used as a significant predictor for the presence of metastasis in BC women with a sensitivity of 97.2% and specificity of 70% (Table 6) and (Figs. 1, 2).

Table 6 Performance of cathepsin-B in breast cancer and metastasis prediction among the studied groups
Fig. 1
figure 1

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for using cathepsin-B as a predictor for cancer breast

Fig. 2
figure 2

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for using cathepsin-B as a predictor for breast cancer metastasis

Discussion

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer among females and poses a significant public health concern. Therefore, identifying circulating biomarkers is crucial for the early detection and diagnosis of BC [20].

The current study revealed that the relative mRNA expression of cathepsin-B was statistically significantly elevated in metastatic BC cases (9.2 ± 2.1-fold change) compared to localized BC cases (5.1 ± 1.8-fold change) and normal individuals (1.1 ± 0.2-fold change) (p < 0.001) (Table 2). A highly significant expression was found among patients with higher tumor stages (T3 and T4) (p = 0.02). Additionally, cathepsin-B gene expression was observed to be notably elevated among cases with lymphatic and distant metastasis compared to patients with lymph node metastasis only (p = 0.04) (Table 3).

The serum IL-6 level was statistically significantly higher among metastatic BC cases than localized BC cases and healthy individuals (p < 0.001). While CA15-3 levels were statistically significantly elevated among BC groups compared to the healthy group (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between cases with localized or metastatic BC (p > 0.05) (Table 4).

Our results showed a strong positive association between cathepsin-B and both IL-6 and CA15-3 (r = 0.905 and 0.667, respectively), (p < 0.001) (Table 5).

When we plotted the ROC curve to investigate the ability of cathepsin-B in predicting BC and metastasis, the test showed 95.8% and 97.2% sensitivity and 94.4% and 70% specificity at a cut-off value of ≥ 1.4- and ≥ 6.1-fold change, with an area under the curve of 0.996 and 0.958, respectively (Table 6) and (Figs. 1, 2). These findings suggest that monitoring cathepsin-B expression in the blood could be a non-invasive and easy diagnostic procedure.

Although CA15-3 is widely used in clinical practice, its role in managing BC remains disputed. The most recent recommendations from both the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) advise against the use of CA15-3 levels assessment for screening, diagnosis, or post-therapy monitoring [21].

CA15-3 levels can be elevated in healthy individuals, benign diseases, malignant illnesses, and various non-malignant conditions, including cirrhosis, hepatitis, lupus, sarcoidosis, and tuberculosis, as well as during pregnancy and breastfeeding [22].

In contrast to our results, Zhao et al. found that individuals with metastatic BC experienced more frequent CA15-3 increases than those with early BC [23].

According to Berruti et al., CA15-3 levels were found to be elevated in various metastatic sites, with patients who had visceral metastasis showing higher rates of elevated CA15-3 levels compared to those with soft tissue and bone metastases [24]. He et al. suggested that patients with higher CA15-3 levels had a higher chance of developing abdominal and bone metastases. In agreement with our results, some studies did not discover significant alterations in CA15-3 levels among various metastatic positions [25].

Cathepsin-B, a lysosomal cysteine protease, is regarded as a “multifunctional enzyme in cancer” and primarily contributes to the proteolytic cascades involved in cancer progression, invasion, and metastasis. Cathepsins are typically found in lysosomes, but when cancer occurs, they often move to the cell surface or are even secreted [5]. In BC, cathepsin-B overexpression can break down the extracellular matrix, allowing cancer cells to migrate and invade surrounding tissues. Additionally, it can activate pro-angiogenic factors, promoting the formation of new blood vessels that feed the tumor [16, 17].

Lah et al. conducted one of the first studies on cathepsin-B in a large group of BC patients. They demonstrated that cathepsin-B levels were significantly higher in breast carcinomas compared to healthy breast tissues, which is consistent with our findings [26].

Decock et al. discovered that early-stage BC patients with poorly differentiated tumors had lower blood cathepsin-B levels than patients with well or moderately differentiated carcinomas [27].

Maguire et al. observed that cathepsin-B levels were significantly higher in both primary carcinomas and metastatic (nodal metastasis) tissues compared to benign tumors (fibroadenomas), aligning with our study results. However, they found no significant difference between cathepsin-B levels in primary cancers and metastatic specimens, and these levels did not correlate with tumor stage or nodal status unlike our findings [28].

Rudzinska-Radecka et al. reported significantly higher cathepsin-B expression in laryngeal cancer compared to nearby normal tissue, with no notable differences between patients with or without lymph node involvement or cancer stage [7].

Cathepsin-B serum concentrations were elevated in hepatoma and cirrhotic liver cases compared to normal individuals, but no distinction was observed between hepatoma and cirrhotic liver cases [29].

IL-6 is a key cytokine present in the cancer microenvironment produced by adipocytes and monocytes that are linked to BC tissues. The effect of IL-6 on BC cell growth varies based on the activation level in the Jak/Stat3 signaling pathway and hormone receptor status. In some instances, IL-6 has been shown to stimulate BC cell growth, while in others, it can inhibit growth. Studies have indicated that IL-6 can play various tumor-promoting roles, including enhancing proliferation and suppressing apoptosis in BC cells [30]. IL-6 can stimulate the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which induces angiogenesis and tumor vascularization [31]. Furthermore, IL-6 can induce the expression of genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which enables cancer cells to acquire a more aggressive, invasive phenotype [32].

In accordance with our findings, Kozlowski et al. reported that patients with BC exhibited significantly elevated levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in their bloodstream compared to healthy women, which was consistent with the patient's clinical information [33].

Furthermore, Mohamed et al. demonstrated that IL-6 can increase the expression of cathepsin-B in response to soluble factors released by BC cells, and showed, through western blotting and enzymatic activity analyses, that counteracting antibodies against IL-6 could reduce cathepsin-B secretion and activity stimulated by 231-conditioned medium [16].

Ibrahim et al. investigated how the cathepsin-B protein expression in BC cells was influenced by IL-6 at different concentrations. They revealed that IL-6 is higher in carcinoma tissues of human hormonal receptor-positive (HRP) BC and that it correlates with the expression of cathepsin-B. Moreover, they found that IL-6, either alone or together with cathepsin-B, are significant therapeutic targets for patients with HRP-BC and positive lymph node patients [11]. Additionally, Knüpfer and Preiss revealed that cathepsin-B and IL-6 were markers associated with poor prognosis in BC patients [34].

Our results, in line with the outcomes of previous studies, suggest that elevated levels of both cathepsin-B and IL-6 are associated with more aggressive BC, poorer prognosis, and resistance to treatment. Consequently, targeting either cathepsin-B or IL-6 has been explored as a promising therapeutic approach in BC. It is influential to note that the association between cathepsin-B and IL-6 in BC is complex and context-dependent, with other factors, such as other proteases, signaling pathways, and interactions with the immune system, also influencing their interplay [16]. Further research is needed to fully elucidate the intricacies of their relationship and its therapeutic implications. Moreover, the current study has key limitations that should be acknowledged, including a small sample size and the fact that the study comprised only Egyptian participants. We suggest that subsequent genetic assessment of the cathepsin-B/IL-6 axis with other proteases, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and signaling pathways, such as NF-κB and STAT3, in diverse molecular subtypes of BC with larger sample sizes is necessary to gain a better understanding of their role in BC development and to evaluate the significance between them.

Conclusions

A significant positive correlation between cathepsin-B and IL-6 in BC Egyptian female cases was found. The levels of cathepsin-B gene expression and IL-6 concentrations were higher in metastatic BC cases than in localized BC patients, and both were higher than in healthy individuals. Furthermore, higher cathepsin-B expression was also associated with higher tumor stages and lymphatic with distant metastasis, suggesting that the IL-6-cathepsin-B interaction may play a role in BC development, progression, and metastasis. Therefore, they can be applied as new non-invasive biomarkers for BC detection and assist in the identification of BC cases in need of prompt treatment to reduce mortality and increase life expectancy. Additionally, they can provide valuable insights into the development of novel therapeutic strategies for BC treatment.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials are available upon request.

Abbreviations

BC:

Breast cancer

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

CA15-3:

Cancer antigen 15-3

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

uPA:

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator

MMP:

Matrix metalloproteinase

ECM:

Extracellular matrix

sIL-6R:

Soluble-IL-6-receptor

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

LN:

Lymph node

HRP:

Hormonal receptor-positive

JNK-AP-1:

C-Jun N-terminal kinase-activator protein-1

ASCO:

American society of clinical oncology

NCCN:

National comprehensive cancer network

References

  1. Łukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, Baj J, Sitarz R, Stanisławek A (2021) Breast cancer-epidemiology, risk factors, classification, prognostic markers, and current treatment strategies-an updated review. Cancers 13(17):4287. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13174287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pišlar A, Bolčina L, Kos J (2021) New insights into the role of cysteine cathepsins in neuroinflammation. Biomolecules 11(12):1796. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11121796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Xie Z, Zhao M, Yan C, Kong W, LanNarengaowa F et al (2023) Cathepsin B in programmed cell death machinery: mechanisms of execution and regulatory pathways. Cell Death Dis 14(4):255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05786-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rudzińska M, Parodi A, Soond SM, Vinarov AZ, Korolev DO et al (2019) The role of cysteine cathepsins in cancer progression and drug resistance. Int J Mol Sci 20(14):3602. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Linders DGJ, Bijlstra OD, Fallert LC, Hilling DE, Walker E, Straight B et al (2023) Cysteine cathepsins in breast cancer: promising targets for fluorescence-guided surgery. Mol Imag Biol 25(1):58–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-022-01768-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shabbir A, Waheed H, Ahmed S, Shaikh SS, Farooqui WA (2022) Association of salivary Cathepsin B in different histological grades among patients presenting with oral squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Oral Health 22(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02052-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudzinska-Radecka M, Frolova AS, Balakireva AV, Gorokhovets NV, Pokrovsky VS, Sokolova DV et al (2022) In silico, in vitro, and clinical investigations of Cathepsin B and Stefin A mRNA expression and a correlation analysis in kidney cancer. Cells 11(9):1455. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11091455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Zheng M, Yang X, Zhou X, Zhang S (2023) The role of Cathepsin B in pathophysiologies of non-tumor and tumor tissues: a systematic review. J Cancer 14(12):2344–2358. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.86531

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin S, Gan Z, Han K, Yao Y, Min D (2015) Interleukin-6 as a prognostic marker for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumori 101(5):535–541. https://doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh AK, Haque M, Madarampalli B, Shi Y, Wildman BJ, Basit A et al (2021) Ets-2 propagates IL-6 trans-signaling mediated osteoclast-like changes in human rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblast. Front Immunol 12:746503. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.746503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ibrahim SA, El-Ghonaimy EA, Hassan H, Mahana N, Mahmoud MA, El-Mamlouk T et al (2016) Hormonal-receptor positive breast cancer: IL-6 augments invasion and lymph node metastasis via stimulating cathepsin B expression. J Adv Res 7(5):661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2016.06.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Naruishi K (2022) Biological roles of fibroblasts in periodontal diseases. Cells 11(21):3345. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells11213345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vafaei R, Samadi M, Hosseinzadeh A, Barzaman K, Esmailinejad M, Khaki Z et al (2022) Comparison of mucin-1 in human breast cancer and canine mammary gland tumor: a review study. Cancer Cell Int 22(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-021-02398-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryu JM, Kang D, Cho J, Lee JE, Kim SW, Nam SJ et al (2023) Prognostic impact of elevation of cancer antigen 15–3 (CA15-3) in patients with early breast cancer with normal serum CA15-3 level. J Breast Cancer 26(2):126–135. https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Esfahbodi A, Fathi M, Rahimi GR (2017) Changes of CEA and CA15-3 biomarkers in the breast cancer patients following eight weeks of aerobic exercise. Basic Clin Cancer Res 9:4–12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mohamed MM, Cavallo-Medved D, Rudy D, Anbalagan A, Moin K, Sloane BF (2010) Interleukin-6 increases expression and secretion of cathepsin B by breast tumor-associated monocytes. Cell Physiol Biochem Int J Exp Cell Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 25(2–3):315–324. https://doi.org/10.1159/000276564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Im E, Venkatakrishnan A, Kazlauskas A (2005) Cathepsin B regulates the intrinsic angiogenic threshold of endothelial cells. Mol Biol Cell 16(8):3488–3500. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e04-11-1029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Humphry RW, Cameron A, Gunn GJ (2004) A practical approach to calculate sample size for herd prevalence surveys. Prev Vet Med 65(3–4):173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods (San Diego Calif.) 25(4):402–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yahia S, Tahari Z, Medjdoub A, Tahari FZ, Bessaih N, Messatfa M et al (2023) Expression profile of interleukin-6, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α in women with breast cancer and their association with clinicopathological parameters. Contemp Oncol (Poznan Pol) 27(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2023.127199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ayala de la Peña F, Ortiz-Muñoz B, Quintanar-Verdúguez T, Santotoribio JD, de la Cruz S, Trapé-Pujol J et al (2021) Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol Off Publ Fed Span Oncol Soc Natl Cancer Inst Mex 23(7):1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-020-02529-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schneider N, Reed E, Kamel F, Ferrari E, Soloviev M (2022) Rational approach to finding genes encoding molecular biomarkers: focus on breast cancer. Genes 13(9):1538. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao W, Li X, Wang W, Chen B, Wang L, Zhang N et al (2021) Association of preoperative serum levels of CEA and CA15–3 with molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Dis Mark. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5529106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berruti A, Tampellini M, Torta M, Buniva T, Gorzegno G, Dogliotti L (1994) Prognostic value in predicting overall survival of two mucinous markers: CA 15–3 and CA 125 in breast cancer patients at first relapse of disease. Eur J Cancer 30A(14):2082–2084. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-8049(94)00356-a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. He ZY, Li X, Chen QS, Sun JY, Li FY, Wu SG et al (2016) Elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen and CA15-3 levels and the risk of site-specific metastases in metastatic breast cancer. Transl Cancer Res 5(5):529–537. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr.2016.08.39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lah TT, Kokalj-Kunovar M, Strukelj B, Pungercar J, Barlic-Maganja D, Drobnic-Kosorok M et al (1992) Stefins and lysosomal cathepsins B, L and D in human breast carcinoma. Int J Cancer 50(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910500109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Decock J, Obermajer N, Vozelj S, Hendrickx W, Paridaens R, Kos J, Cathepsin B (2008) Cathepsin H, cathepsin X and cystatin C in sera of patients with early-stage and inflammatory breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers 23(3):161–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/172460080802300305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maguire TM, Shering SG, Duggan CM, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Duffy MJ (1998) High levels of cathepsin B predict poor outcome in patients with breast cancer. Int J Biol Markers 13(3):139–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/172460089801300303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Leto G, Tumminello FM, Pizzolanti G, Montalto G, Soresi M, Gebbia N (1997) Lysosomal cathepsins B and L and Stefin A blood levels in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and/or liver cirrhosis: potential clinical implications. Oncology 54(1):79–83. https://doi.org/10.1159/000227666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen J, Wei Y, Yang W, Huang Q, Chen Y, Zeng K et al (2022) IL-6: the link between inflammation, immunity and breast cancer. Front Oncol 12:903800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.903800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang B, Lang X, Li X (2022) The role of IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in cancers. Front Oncol 12:1023177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1023177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Abaurrea A, Araujo AM, Caffarel MM (2021) The role of the IL-6 cytokine family in epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in cancer progression. Int J Mol Sci 22(15):8334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22158334

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kozłowski L, Zakrzewska I, Tokajuk P, Wojtukiewicz MZ (2003) Concentration of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-8 (IL-8) and interleukin-10 (IL-10) in blood serum of breast cancer patients. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst 48:82–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Knüpfer H, Preiss R (2007) Significance of interleukin-6 (IL-6) in breast cancer (review). Breast Cancer Res Treat 102(2):129–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-006-9328-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledged all individuals included in our research.

Funding

The study did not receive any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BAI and ENE created the idea and designed the research. ESN conducted the statistical analysis of the data. BAI, and ESN accomplished all the laboratory tests and interpreted the patients’ data. AMIK and AKT chose the patients. All authors wrote, read, and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Basma A. Ibrahim.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The research conducted in this study was approved by the Ethical Board of the University of Zagazig, Faculty of Medicine, with reference number Zu-IRB# 10101/13-11-2022, and all participants signed the consent form for participation in the study.

Consent for publication

All the authors declared their consent for publication of the manuscript in this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ibrahim, B.A., Nagdy, E.S., Nour Eldin, E. et al. Assessment of interleukin-6 and cathepsin-B gene expression in breast cancer women. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 25, 95 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00571-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00571-w

Keywords