Skip to main content

Irreversible methadone-induced GSTP1 downregulation in SH-SY5Y cells

Abstract

Background

Methadone has been reported to downregulate the expression of glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) among nine antioxidant genes in SH-SY5Y cells after both short- and long-term treatment. GSTP1 plays a key role in the detoxification of many xenobiotics and is frequently associated with various diseases, especially tumors. The objective of this study is to determine whether this change is reversible.

Methods

Two different treatment protocols were used. The first protocol evaluated the reversibility of the GSTP1 mRNA change, while the second protocol evaluated the methylation status of the GSTP1 promoter site. To investigate the reversibility of the GSTP1 mRNA change, SH-SY5Y cells were treated with methadone. The drug was then removed from the medium and the cells were cultured in methadone-free medium for a period of time. GSTP1 mRNA levels were expressed as cycle threshold (Ct) values using TATA box-binding protein as a calibrator gene. Methylation at the promoter site was detected by bisulfite treatment.

Results

The analysis of variance revealed no significant change in GSTP1 mRNA levels in the cells after methadone was removed from the medium of methadone-treated cells. The study also examined the methylation status of a CpG island in the promoter of GSTP1 in the treated cells. The results demonstrate that although methadone downregulates the mRNA level of GSTP1 in treated cells, it does not induce methylation in the GSTP1 promoter region.

Conclusions

The expression of the GSTP1 remains downregulated even after methadone removal from SH-SY5Y cell culture medium; however, methylation of the GSTP1 promoter site does not play a role in this process.

Background

Methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) is a proven harm reduction approach for the treatment of drug dependence. Methadone is a potent inducer of NADH/NADPH-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) synthesis [1,2,3]. The deleterious effects of ROS can be prevented by antioxidant systems, particularly glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) [4]. GSTs are classified into several classes, including alpha, mu, kappa, pi, and omega. GSTP1 (MIM: 134,660) plays an important role in the detoxification of various xenobiotics [4, 5].

The mRNA levels of nine antioxidant genes in SH-SY5Y cells were evaluated following treatment with varying concentrations of methadone (1, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 20 µM) for different durations (1, 24, and 72 h as short-term treatment and 18 days as a long-term treatment) [6, 7]. The genes were classified into three groups based on the changes in their mRNA levels: (I) Six genes (CAT, SOD1, SOD2, NQO1, NQO2, and GSTM2) showed an increase at 1 h and 24 h (particularly at relatively high methadone concentrations), followed by a decrease at 72 h. (II) The expression levels of two genes (GSTM3 and GSTO1) increased at 1 h, decreased at 24 h, and then increased again at 72 h. (III) GSTP1 expression levels decreased in treated cells from 1 h to 3 days [6]. Among nine antioxidant genes, only the expression of GSTP1 showed a decrease after short- and long-term methadone treatment in SH-SY5Y cells [6, 7]. However, the reversibility of GSTP1 downregulation after methadone exposure of SH-SY5Y cells was not investigated. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine whether this change is reversible.

Epigenetic alterations, such as promoter hypermethylation, are important and often involved in tumor initiation, progression, and recurrence [8,9,10]. DNA methylation in the promoter of GSTP1 has been frequently reported in a variety of tumors, including neuroblastoma [11], hepatocellular carcinoma [12], endometrial [13], breast [14], and prostate cancers [15]. Methylation status is involved in the regulation of gene expression. Methadone induces hypermethylation in human DNA [16, 17] and in a number of genes such as the OPRM1 gene [18, 19]. Therefore, we decided to examine the methylation status of the GSTP1 gene promoter to determine whether changes in gene expression are irreversible after methadone is removed from the culture medium.

In summary, the present study had two aims: (1) to investigate the reversibility of GSTP1 downregulation after methadone exposure of SH-SY5Y cells and (2) to determine the methylation status of the GSTP1 gene promoter in methadone-treated SH-SY5Y cells.

Material and methods

Cell treatments

The human SH-SY5Y cell line has been widely used as an in vitro model in experimental neurological studies, including the analysis of neuronal differentiation, metabolism, neurotoxicity, neuroprotection, and neuronal differentiation [20]. The SH-SY5Y cells have also been used in some experiments to determine the effect of methadone on the expression levels of several antioxidant genes [6, 7]. In the present study, the human SH-SY5Y cell line was obtained from the National Cell Bank of Iran (Pasteur Institute of Iran, NCBI: C611). SH-SY5Y cells were maintained in medium (DMEM F-12; 1:1) supplemented with Glutamax, 10% FBS (GIBCO), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Sigma).

Two different treatment protocols were performed. The first protocol was used to test the reversibility of the downregulation of GSTP1, and the second protocol was used to investigate the methylation status of the GSTP1 promoter region. In the first treatment protocol, cells were exposed to methadone at final concentrations of 2.5 and 10 μM for 24 and 72 h and 18 days. The final methadone concentrations and exposure times which chosen for the present experiments were used in previous studies [6, 7]. To determine the reversibility of the decrease in mRNA levels, methadone was removed from the medium and cells were cultured in methadone-free medium. After a period of time, the cells were harvested and the GSTP1 mRNA levels were measured. In the second treatment protocol, cells were exposed to methadone at a final concentration of 10 μM for 1, 24 and 72 h and 18 days. Cells were harvested, genomic DNA was extracted, and DNA methylation status was determined.

Measurement of GSTP1 expression

Total RNA was extracted using the RNX-Plus kit (CinnaGene, Iran) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA samples were used for cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript RT Regent Kit (Takara, Japan). GSTP1 mRNA levels were quantified according to the previously described protocol [6]. The following primer pairs for GSTP1 (as gene of interest) and TATA box-binding protein (TBP, MIM: 600,075, as calibrator gene) were designed using Allele ID v7. 8 software: for GSTP1: 5′-ACT CAA AGC CTC CTG CCT ATA C-3′ and 5′-GTC CTT CCC ATA GAG CCC AAG-3′ and for TBP: 5′-CCC GAA ACG CCG AAT ATA ATC-3′ and 5′-TCT GGA CTG TTC TTC ACT CTT G-3′. The primers were specific for mRNA and did not amplify genomic DNA. The product size was 121 and 134 bp for GSTP1 and TBP, respectively. The efficiency of the real-time PCR was evaluated by serial dilution of a cDNA sample and the above primers. The efficiency was 0.98% and 101% for the TBP and GSTP1 primer sets, respectively. PCRs were performed in 20 µl final volume containing 25 ng cDNA. The PCR was set at 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 45 s.

Relative differences in GSTP1 mRNA levels between groups were expressed as Ct values. These Ct values were first normalized to that of TBP in the same sample and then expressed as fold change relative to untreated SH-SY5Y cells (= 1.0). Relative mRNA values were calculated using the equation: 2−ΔΔCt [21].

Determination of methylated CpG

Bisulfite treatment was performed according to the previously described protocol [22]. It is important to note that unmethylated cytosine (C) is converted to thymine (T), while methylated cytosine remains as cytosine. Genomic DNA (800 ng) was treated with sodium bisulfite using the ZYMO RESEARCH Methylation Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. All samples were examined in duplicate.

In the first step, primers for amplification of the upstream GSTP1 CpG island were designed using Allele ID v7.8 software, and amplification (323 bp) was performed using 10 μL RealQ Master Mix Green (2×) and 1 μM of each primer (primer A: 5′-TGG GAA AGA GGG AAA GGC TTC-3′ and primer B: 5′- CTG ATG CTG CGG GTT GG-3′). Amplification consisted of 10 min at 95 °C, 35 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 61 °C, using Corbett Research RG-6000 Real Time PCR. A second round of amplification (300 bp) was performed as above using 2.5 µl of the product of the first amplification with the nested primers C: 5′-TGG GAA AGA GGG AAA GGT TTT-3′ and D: 5′-ACT AAA AAC TCT AAA CCC CAT CCC-3′. Amplification consisted of 10 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 25 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 60 °C. Second round primers were designed using Zymo Research online software (www.zymo re-search.com/tools/bisulfite-primer-seeker). Quality control of the PCR product was performed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Specific bands were isolated and purified using the GeneJET Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific™ K0691), followed by sequencing services provided by MacroGen Ltd.

Statistical analysis

GSTP1 mRNA levels data are presented as mean ± SE for three independent biological replicates. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to analyze the effect of methadone and/or drug withdrawal on GSTP1 mRNA levels. Multifactorial ANOVA was performed to analyze the effect of methadone concentrations, methadone exposure times, and duration of SH-SY5Y cells cultured in methadone-free medium on GSTP1 mRNA levels. SPSS statistical package (version 25) was used for data analysis (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A probability of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The present study consisted of two steps. As mentioned earlier, treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with methadone caused a downregulation of GSTP1 mRNA levels [6, 7]. Therefore, in the first step, we investigated the reversibility of this change by treating the cells with methadone, removing the drug from the medium, and culturing the cells in methadone-free medium for a period of time. Figure 1 shows the GSTP1 mRNA levels in these cells and their comparison with treated and untreated SH-SY5Y cells. The expression level of the GSTP1 gene showed a significant decrease at 1, 3 and 18 days after treatment of SH-SY5Y cells with 2.5 and 10 μM final concentration of methadone (P < 0.001), confirming the results of the previous studies [6, 7].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Expression of GSTP1 (mean ± SE) in SH-SH5Y cells exposed to methadone and subsequently cultured in methadone-free medium. The results of the analysis of variance are shown above each set of experiments

To determine the reversibility of GSTP1 downregulation, cells were exposed to 2.5 μM methadone for 24 h, then methadone was removed from the medium and the cells were cultured in methadone-free medium for 1 and 24 h. Statistical comparison using one-way ANOVA showed that the mRNA level of GSTP1 in SH-SY5Y cells treated with methadone (2.5 μM) and the cells treated with methadone and then cultured in methadone-free medium were statistically equal to each other (F = 1.509; df = 2, 6; P = 0.294), indicating that the GSTP1 mRNA level did not return to its normal level when the cells were cultured in methadone-free medium for 1 or 24 h. This means that the mean mRNA levels of GSTP1 were statistically equal in the groups studied. The same comparisons were made for 5 other sets of experiments and the same results were obtained. There was no significant change in GSTP1 mRNA levels after methadone was removed from the medium. The results of the statistical tests are shown in Fig. 1.

Further statistical analysis was performed on all datasets using factorial analysis of variance with methadone concentrations, methadone exposure times, and duration of SH-SY5Y cells cultured in methadone-free medium as predictive factors. Statistical analysis revealed that methadone concentrations (F = 0.343; df = 1, 46; P = 0.561), methadone exposure times (F = 1.953; df = 2, 46; P = 0.153), and duration of cells cultured in methadone-free medium (F = 1.403; df = 3, 46; P = 0.248) had no significant effect on GSTP1 mRNA levels (Table 1). This means that the downregulation of GSTP1 was independent of methadone dose and methadone exposure time.

Table 1 Effect of methadone concentrations, methadone exposure times, and duration of SH-SY5Y cells cultured in methadone-free medium on the GSTP1 mRNA level

In the second step, we evaluated the methylation status of CpG islands in the promoter region of the GSTP1 gene in SH-SY5Y cells after they were stabilized with methadone treatment for 1, 24, and 72 h. We analyzed a total of thirty-eight CpG dinucleotides, consisting of 28 CpG sites located in the negative (−) region of the gene and ten CpG sites located in the positive (+) region (see Fig. 2A). Interestingly, the results showed that methadone treatment does not induce methylation at any of the CpG sites within the promoter region (Fig. 2B and C). A G to T substitution in the +72 region of the GSTP1 promoter was observed during sequencing in SH-SY5Y cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

A NCBI reference sequence for promoter region of the GSTP1, B The GSTP1 promoter region in SH-SY5Y cells, C The GSTP1 promoter sequence in SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with bisulfite. The red color shows a G > T substitution at the +72 region in the SH-SY5Y cells

Discussion

Previously, the expression of GSTP1 was shown to be downregulated among nine antioxidant genes in SH-SY5Y cells after both short-term and long-term treatment [6, 7]. In the present study, we showed no significant change in GSTP1 mRNA levels in SH-SY5Y cells after methadone was removed from the medium of methadone-treated cells (Fig. 1).

Studies have shown that methylation status is involved in the regulation of gene expression [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. Studies have shown that the promoter region is an epigenetic sensor of synthetic and non-synthetic opioid drugs. The CpG-rich promoter harbors a CpG island, and several studies in different populations have demonstrated higher DNA methylation at this site in opioid addicts and methadone-maintained heroin addicts [23, 24]. Methadone has also been reported to induce hypermethylation in human DNA [16, 17] and in a number of genes such as the OPRM1 gene [18, 19]. Considering that the downregulation of GSTP1 in methadone-treated cells is an irreversible change, we hypothesized that GSTP1 might be hypermethylated by methadone treatment. However, our results showed that although GSTP1 is downregulated by methadone treatment and the transcript of GSTP1 remains downregulated after drug withdrawal, methadone treatment does not induce methylation at any of the CpG sites within the GSTP1 promoter region.

It is not possible to be certain that GSTP1 mRNA levels will not return to normal later in time. It is likely that the recovery process in the cells cultured in methadone-free medium is very slow and more time is needed for GSTP1 mRNA levels to return to its normal level. Further experiments are needed to make a final conclusion, including investigation of the change in protein level and enzyme activity of GSTP1 in the SH-SY5Y cells treated with methadone.

Conclusion

Previous studies have shown that the expression of GSTP1 is downregulated after both short-term and long-term methadone treatment. The current study showed that methadone treatment irreversibly decreased the mRNA levels in SH-SY5Y cells and that the downregulation of GSTP1 was not related to methylation by methadone treatment. Further experiments are needed to fully characterize the downregulation of GSTP1 in methadone-treated cells.

Availability of data and materials

All data are presented in the text.

Abbreviations

CAT:

Catalase

Ct:

Cycle threshold

FBS:

Fetal calf serum

GSTM2:

Glutathione S-transferase M2

GSTM2:

Glutathione S-transferase M3

GSTO1:

Glutathione S-transferase O1

GSTP1:

Glutathione S-transferase P1

MIM:

Mendelian inheritance in man

NQO1:

NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, Quinone 1

NQO2:

NAD(P)H dehydrogenase, Quinone 2

OPRM1:

Opioid receptor, MU-1

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SE:

Standard error

SOD1:

Superoxide dismutase 1

SOD2:

Superoxide dismutase 2

TBP:

TATA box-binding protein

References

  1. Koch T, Seifert A, Wu DF, Rankovic M, Kraus J, Börner C, Brandenburg LO, Schröder H, Höllt V (2009) μ-Opioid receptor-stimulated synthesis of reactive oxygen species is mediated via phospholipase D2. J Neurochem 110:1288–1296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arezoomandan M, Zhiani R, Mehrzad J, Motavalizadehkakhy A, Eshrati S, Arezoomandan R (2022) Inflammatory, oxidative stress and cognitive functions in patients under maintenance treatment with methadone or buprenorphine and healthy subjects. J Clin Neurosci 101:57–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Salarian A, Kadkhodaee M, Zahmatkesh M, Seifi B, Bakhshi E, Akhondzadeh S, Adeli S, Askari H, Arbabi M (2018) Opioid use disorder induces oxidative stress and inflammation: the attenuating effect of methadone maintenance treatment. Iran J Psychiatry 13(1):46–54

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mazari AMA, Zhang L, Ye ZW, Zhang J, Tew KD, Townsend DM (2023) The multifaceted role of glutathione S-transferases in health and disease. Biomolecules 13(4):688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Niitsu Y, Sato Y, Takayama T (2022) Implications of glutathione-S transferase P1 in MAPK signaling as a CRAF chaperone: in memory of Dr Irving Listowsky. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci 98(2):72–86

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Saify K, Saadat M (2015) Expression patterns of antioxidant genes in human SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with methadone. Psychiatry Res 230(1):116–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saify K, Saadat M (2016) Expression levels of antioxidant genes in human SH-SY5Y cells long term exposed to methadone. Turkish J Biochem 41(6):493–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sarkar S, Horn G, Moulton K, Oza A, Byler S, Kokolus S, Longacre M (2013) Cancer development, progression, and therapy: an epigenetic overview. Int J Mol Sci 14:21087–21113

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Vecchio L, Seke PF, Kipanyula MJ, Krampera M, NwaboKamdje AH (2013) Importance of epigenetic changes in cancer etiology, pathogenesis, clinical profiling, and treatment: what can be learned from hematologic malignancies? Biochim Biophys Acta 1(1836):90–104

    Google Scholar 

  10. Casadio V, Molinari C, Calistri D, Tebaldi M, Gunelli R, Serra L, Falcini F, Zingaretti C, Silvestrini R, Amadori D, Zoli W (2013) DNA Methylation profiles as predictors of recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: an MS-MLPA approach. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 32(1):94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gumy-Pause F, Pardo B, Khoshbeen-Boudal M, Ansari M, Gayet-Ageron A, Sappino AP, Attiyeh EF, Ozsahin H (2012) GSTP1 hypermethylation is associated with reduced protein expression, aggressive disease and prognosis in neuroblastoma. Genes Chromos Canc 51(2):174–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li QF, Li QY, Gao AR, Shi QF (2015) Correlation between promoter methylation in the GSTP1 gene and hepatocellular carcinoma development: a meta-analysis. Genet Mol Res 14(2):6762–6772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fiolka R, Zubor P, Janusicova V, Visnovsky J, Mendelova A, Kajo K, Lasabova Z, Plank L, Danko J (2013) Promoter hypermethylation of the tumor-suppressor genes RASSF1A, GSTP1 and CDH1 in endometrial cancer. Oncol Rep 30(6):2878–2886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fang C, Wei XM, Zeng XT, Wang FB, Weng H, Long X (2015) Aberrant GSTP1 promoter methylation is associated with increased risk and advanced stage of breast cancer: a metaanalysis of 19 case-control studies. BMC Canc 15:920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Goering W, Kloth M, Schulz WA (2012) DNA methylation changes in prostate cancer. Methods Mol Biol 863:47–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knothe C, Doehring A, Ultsch A, Lotsch J (2016) Methadone induces hypermethylation of human DNA. Epigenomics 8(2):167–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marie-Claire C, Crettol S, Cagnard N, Bloch V, Mouly S, Laplanche JL, Bellivier F, Lepine JP, Eap C, Vorspan F (2016) Variability of response to methadone: genome-wide DNA methylation analysis in two independent cohorts. Epigenomics 8(2):181–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nielsen DA, Yuferov V, Hamon S, Jackson C, Ho A, Ott J, Kreek MJ (2009) Increased OPRM1 DNA methylation in lymphocytes of methadone-maintained former heroin addicts. Neuropsychopharmacology 34:867–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebrahimi G, Asadikaram G, Akbari H, Nematollahi MH, Abolhassani M, Shahabinejad G, Khodadadnejad L, Hashemi M (2018) Elevated levels of DNA methylation at the OPRM1 promoter region in men with opioid use disorder. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 44(2):193–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopez-Suarez L, Awabdh SA, Coumoul X, Chauvet C (2022) The SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line, a relevant in vitro cell model for investigating neurotoxicology in human: focus on organic pollutants. Neurotoxicology 92:131–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc 3:1101–1108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martignano F, Gurioli G, Salvi S, Calistri D, Costantini M, Gunelli R, De Giorgi U, Foca F, Casadio V (2016) GSTP1 methylation and protein expression in prostate cancer: diagnostic implications. Dis Markers 2016:4358292

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Doehring A, Oertel BG, Sittl R, Lotsch J (2013) Chronic opioid use is associated with increased DNA methylation correlating with increased clinical pain. Pain 154:15–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sandoval-Sierra JV, Salgado García FI, Brooks JH, Derefinko KJ, Mozhui K (2020) Effect of short-term prescription opioids on DNA methylation of the OPRM1 promoter. Clin Epigenetics 12(1):76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The study conception and design and data analysis were performed by MS. Material preparation, data collection, and measurement of gene expression were performed by KS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Saadat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study had been accepted by Ethics Committee of Shiraz University (DB-SU-909402; 13.10.2015).

Consent for publication

None.

Competing interests

The author declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saify, K., Saadat, M. Irreversible methadone-induced GSTP1 downregulation in SH-SY5Y cells. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 25, 31 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00504-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-024-00504-7

Keywords