Skip to main content

Exome sequencing identifies a novel GUCY2D mutation in an Iranian family with Leber congenital amaurosis-1: a case report



Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), the severe form of inherited retinal degenerative disorder, is a prevalent disorder in the first year of life. Recently, genetic studies discovered that different gene mutations are responsible for LCA clinical manifestations.

Case presentation

In this study, we applied whole exome sequencing (WES) to identify probable gene defects in an Iranian girl with LCA-1. We found a novel disease-causing GUCY2D gene mutation (c.2348T > C; p.L783P), located in exon 12 (NM_000180), causing a missense mutation that has been changed the coding protein. The WES-identified variant was confirmed by Sanger sequencing for the patient and her healthy parents. Submitted to genetic counseling that the patient was 1-year old and blindness from birth.


Our findings establish that this detected GUCY2D-p.L783P mutation is the pathogenic variant for LCA-1. This is the first genetic study indicating that c.2348T > C missense mutation in the homozygous state in GUCY2D gene is responsible for the LCA-1 phenotype.


Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is the most severe form of inherited retinal dystrophy that diagnosed with blindness or severe visual impairment before the first year of age [1, 2]. LCA is an autosomal recessive disorder with the prevalence rate of one patient in every 80,000 people around the world [3].

Etiologically, childhood blindness can be triggered from different risk factors such as genetic and chromosomal abnormalities, and intrauterine infections. [4]. Studies have shown that genetic factors are responsible for more than 50% of all types of eye diseases [5]. Genetic eye diseases include a large number of ocular complications that can be passed from parents to children [6].

Previously, it has been identified that genetic abnormality in a group of genes included GUCY2D, RPE65, RPGRIP1, AIPL1, CRB1, NMNAT1, and CEP290 associated with LCA cases; however, more studies demonstrated that there are 26 genes related to the LCA [7, 8]. On the other hand, it has been determined that recessive and dominant mutations in the GUCY2D gene were the underlying defects in LCA-1 and cone-rod degeneration, respectively [9, 10]. The GUCY2D gene is composed of 20 exons, located on the short arm of chromosome 17 (17p13.1) and encodes a 1,103-amino acids protein named retinal guanylyl cyclase-1 (RetGC-1) [10].

Moreover, the whole exome sequencing (WES) technique is a perfect diagnostic method in these cases that compares the obtained results with the reference sequences. Therefore, it is able to identify disease-causing mutations in affected patients [11].

We reported here an Iranian patient affected by LCA-1 with blindness. To identify the underlying genetic defect, in this case, we performed WES followed by a targeted sequencing approach.

Case presentation

We have enrolled an Iranian family with LCA-1 from the Ahvaz (Khuzestan province, Iran). The patient was a 1-year-old girl with no light perception (NLP) blindness (Fig. 1A). Clinical examination was performed by neuro-ophthalmologists and confirmed as a blindness case by visual evoked potentials (VEPs) test. The patient's problem was blindness at the beginning of her life, as her parents were mentioned to the genetic counseling. Other clinical complication was retinal degeneration throughout the retina in both eyes. She was born to consanguineous normal parents, and there was no family history of inherited diseases such as LCA.

Fig. 1
figure 1

A Pedigree of the family with the p.L783P mutation. Symbols with a black dot at the center are carriers of a mutation but with no LCA-1 phenotype and filled symbol indicate an affected individual. B Electropherogram of the affected patient and her normal parents demonstrating a homozygous c.2348T > C mutation of the GUCY2D gene and heterozygous carrier state in her parents. C The amino acid changes (leucine to proline) caused by the changes in the DNA sequence

Total genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes sample of the patient and her family members using a standard salting-out protocol. WES (Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea) was conducted to detect mutations in particular genes to hereditary this type of eye disease in the gDNA of the proband. A novel single-nucleotide variant (NM_000180: c.2348T > C; p.L783P) was detected in exon 12 of the GUCY2D gene. No mutation was detected in other genes.

The frequency (below 1%) of the detected variants were checked in the 1000 genomes database (, exome aggregation consortium (ExAC), and single-nucleotide polymorphism database (dbSNP). In silico analyses using Sort Intolerated From Tolerated (SIFT), Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (PolyPhen-2), and Mutation Taster predicted that L783P variant would be damaging and disease-causing. Also, the mutation has been classified as likely pathogenic based on American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines. Finally, the candidate variant was checked by both ClinVar ( and the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD, This is the first report of mutation of the GUCY2D gene in a patient affected by LCA-1.

The candidate mutation (c.2348T > C) was confirmed by sanger sequencing for the patient and family members. In order to amplify the GUCY2D-Specific genomic DNA fragments, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was used. The results demonstrated that the affected case was homozygous for this novel mutation and her parents carried a heterozygous GUCY2D c.2348T > C (p.L783P) variant (Fig. 1B). This missense mutation causes variation in amino acid from leucine to proline (CTG > CCG) at codon 783 (Fig. 1C).


LCA is a major concern among different types of inherited retinal blindness due to its devastating severity [1]. Although genetic consulting for consanguine parents is highly recommended, we are still witnessing the birth of babies with congenital disorders [1, 3, 12]. So far, studies on genetic defects of LCA indicated that about 70% of patients suffered from a molecular disease-causing event. As the recent efforts focused on the new therapeutic strategies such as gene replacement therapy, finding the underlying genetic problem in affected patients is a very important issue [1].

Hence, in this study, we investigated for the disease-causing mutation in a 1-year-old affected girl, who was referred to medical genetics for no light perception (NLP) blindness. The patient was belonging to consanguineous healthy parents with no history of inherited disorders. The WES was applied to identify the impaired gene in this case and a homozygous missense mutation (c.2348T > C; p.Leu783Pro) in the exon 12 of the GUCY2D gene was detected, followed by heterozygous mutations in her consanguine parents that resulted in homogeneity in their child.

The GUCY2D gene located in chromosome 17, encodes retGC-1 protein that plays a critical role in restoring photoreceptor sensitivity by converting guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) [10]. It was declared that GUCY2D gene mutations accounted for about 6%–21% of all LCA cases [13]. Considering the most of 127-point mutations detected so far in GUCY2D gene can affect all retGC-1 domains and subsequently result in LCA phenotype [9, 13]; our finding also added another novel missense mutation in GUCY2D gene leading to LCA-1 disorder.

We proposed that this novel missense mutation encodes an impaired form of retGC-1 protein that probably defects in function or stability resulting in LCA-1 clinical manifestations. In addition, it has been described previously that the LCA-1 phenotype caused by mutations in the retGC-1, dramatically reduced retGC-1 activity [9, 13]. So that, in a study, Xue Feng et al. evaluated a Chinese family with LCA-1 to determine underlying genetic defect and showed that there were three novel mutation in the GUCY2D gene result in truncated protein or activity reduction [13]. In another investigation, Libe Gradstein et al. described a novel mutation in GUCY2D gene as well as other known mutations in eight affected LCA patients. In addition, molecular modeling approaches implied that loss of retGC-1 helical structure because of the c.2129C > T; p.Ala710Val mutation in the GUCY2D gene, which is likely to affect the catalytic center [14].

Finally, the GUCY2D-p.L783P mutation was identified in an Iranian patient affected by LCA-1 and has not been previously reported in any of the mutation databases. We have four pieces of evidence proves that this mutation can lead to LCA-1: 1. Only this mutation was detected by WES and could be the main cause of LCA-1. 2. Bioinformatics tools such as SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and Mutation taster confirmed that this variant was predicted to be damaging and disease-causing. 3. According to the samples analyzed by direct Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1B), the presence of this mutation was proved in the patient, and the pattern of inheritance must be an autosomal recessive for the GUCY2D gene because the patient carries a homozygous mutation and her consanguine parents are heterozygous for the detected mutation. 4. A point mutation c.2348T > C of the GUCY2D gene, in exon 12 causes substitution of leucine by proline at position 783 which would be expected to affect retGC-1 function.


The present study detected a case of LCA-1 with a novel homozygous GUCY2D gene mutation (c.2348T > C; p.L783P) in an Iranian girl from a heterozygous and carrier parents using WES technique. It can be concluded that this point of detected mutation is a novel mutational hotspot point that carried in patient ancestors. Moreover, our findings confirm previous reports that mutation in GUCY2D gene is associated with LCA disease, and we show that this method can be useful for identifying rare causative genetic variants in LCA patients.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics


Cyclic guanosine monophosphate


Single nucleotide polymorphism database


Exome aggregation consortium


Genomic DNA


Guanosine triphosphate


Human gene mutation database


Leber congenital amaurosis


No light perception


Polymerase chain reaction


Polymorphism phenotyping v2


Retinal guanylyl cyclase-1


Sort intolerated from tolerated


Whole exome sequencing


Visual evoked potentials


  1. den Hollander AI, Roepman R, Koenekoop RK, Cremers FP (2008) Leber congenital amaurosis: genes, proteins and disease mechanisms. Prog Retin Eye Res 27(4):391–419.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Koenekoop RK (2004) An overview of Leber congenital amaurosis: a model to understand human retinal development. Surv Ophthalmol 49(4):379–398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Imani S, Cheng J, Mobasher-Jannat A, Wei C, Fu S, Yang L et al (2018) Identification of a novel RPGRIP1 mutation in an Iranian family with leber congenital amaurosis by exome sequencing. J Cell Mol Med 22(3):1733–1742.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Foster A, Gilbert C (1992) Epidemiology of childhood blindness. Eye (Lond) 6(2):173–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rim PH, Magna LA, Ramalho AS (2006) Genetics and prevention of blindness. Arq Bras Oftalmol 69(4):481–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tabbara KF, Badr IA (1985) Changing pattern of childhood blindness in Saudi Arabia. Br J Ophthalmol 69(4):312–315.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Ibrahim HI, Hidayat HJ (2021) Case report: A GUCY2D gene mutation in Kurdish Nation with Leber congenital amaurosis-1 disease. Ann RSCB 25(4):14049–14054

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salehi Chaleshtori AR, Garshasbi M, Salehi A (2019) A novel deletion mutation in GUCY2D gene may be responsible for Leber congenital amaurosis-1 disease: a case report. J Curr Ophthalmol 31(4):458–462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wimberg H, Lev D, Yosovich K, Namburi P, Banin E, Sharon D et al (2018) Photoreceptor Guanylate Cyclase (GUCY2D) mutations cause retinal dystrophies by severe malfunction of Ca2+-dependent cyclic GMP synthesis. Front Mol Neurosci 11:348.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Hoyos M, Auz-Alexandre CL, Almoguera B, Cantalapiedra D, Riveiro-Alvarez R, Lopez-Martinez MA et al (2011) Mutation analysis at codon 838 of the Guanylate Cyclase 2D gene in Spanish families with autosomal dominant cone, cone-rod, and macular dystrophies. Mol Vis 17:1103–1109

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang Y, Muzny DM, Xia F, Niu Z, Person R, Ding Y et al (2014) Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA 312(18):1870–1879.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Chacon-Camacho OF, Zenteno JC. Review and update on the molecular basis of Leber congenital amaurosis. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(2):112–24.

  13. Feng X, Wei T, Sun J, Luo Y, Huo Y, Yu P et al (2020) The pathogenicity of novel GUCY2D mutations in Leber congenital amaurosis 1 assessed by HPLC-MS/MS. PLoS ONE 15(4):e0231115.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gradstein L, Zolotushko J, Sergeev YV, Lavy I, Narkis G, Perez Y et al (2016) Novel GUCY2D mutation causes phenotypic variability of Leber congenital amaurosis in a large kindred. BMC Med Genet 17:52.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the family members for their participation in this study.


There is no financial support.

Author information




MN made design of the study and wrote the manuscript. MN, AIA and JMA analyzed and interpreted the data. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa Neissi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient, and the study was carried out according to the Ethics Committee of Iran’s Ministry of Health and Medical Education guidelines; reference number is not available.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the patient for publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declared there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Neissi, M., Al-Badran, A.I. & Mohammadi-Asl, J. Exome sequencing identifies a novel GUCY2D mutation in an Iranian family with Leber congenital amaurosis-1: a case report. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 23, 9 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Leber congenital amaurosis
  • GUCY2D
  • Novel mutation
  • Whole exome sequencing (WES)
  • Case report