Skip to main content

The prognostic impact of Wilms tumor-1 polymorphism (rs16754) and human myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor expression in cytogenetically normal-acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract

Background

There are several genetic mutations that carry prognostic and predictive values in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). They are also implicated in disease pathogenesis and patient outcome. They can be a target of novel therapies for AML. The aim of the current study was to investigate prognostic value of Wilms’ tumor-1 (WT1) genotypes and human myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like (hMICL) receptor expression in normal-cytogenetic group of patients with AML. Genotyping of WT1 mutations was done by Rotor Gene real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) while hMICL expression was detected using phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-human (MoAbs) by flow cytometry.

Results

Sixty-three patients with cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) were included in the study. The alternate allele of WT1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs16754 was found in 26.89%. At day 28 of therapy, complete remission was achieved in 100% of cases harboring mutant AG plus GG genotypes but only in 6.38% of cases harboring wild genotype (AA). After 6 months, 88.23% of patients harboring WT1 mutant genotype maintained complete remission, while only 23.40% of patients with wild type showed complete remission. The overall survival in patients harboring mutant WT1 genotypes was significantly longer than in those who carried the wild type gene (P-value, 0.001). Additionally, hMICL was overexpressed in approximately 87.3% of AML cases and inversely related to complete response. Similarly, overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with positive hMICL (P-value, 0.001).

Conclusion

Mutant WT1 genotypes (SNP rs16754) were conversely, associated with complete response, and hMICL overexpression had poor prognostic value in AML.

Background

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease in clinical presentation. Its biological behavior characterized by cytogenetic abnormalities, which provide powerful prognostic information [1].

Many curatively treated patients with AML have relapse but estimated to be in complete remission (CR) by standard diagnostic criteria [2]. This is thought to be caused by the presence and outgrowth of sustaining leukemic stem cells in the bone marrow (BM), termed minimal residual disease (MRD) [3].

Cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) represents the largest cytogenetic group of AML cases [4]. Better understanding of the pattern of gene mutation in this group of patients will improve diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic options for MRD [5]. Additionally, formal proof supporting preventive intervention of patients with MRD-positive AML is still limited [6, 7].

The Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) gene is a tumor suppressor gene located on chromosome 11p13 and has a regulatory role in normal and malignant hematopoiesis [8]. WT1 is expressed in CD34-positive progenitor cells and is downregulated during the process of hematopoietic differentiation and undetectable in mature leukocytes [9].

The most important WT1 gene mutations associated with AML are clustered in exon 7 (hotspot region), and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), rs16754, is also located in this region [10]. This gene mutation was reported in approximately 10% of patients with CN-AML [1].

WT1 gene overexpression could be observed in many patients with AML at diagnosis, which disappeared when CR was achieved by chemotherapy [11]. Hence, WT1 gene expression has been regarded as a potential biomarker for the detection of MRD in AML, and disappearance of WT1 gene positivity during chemotherapy had a favorable effect on survival [12, 13].

The human myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor (hMICL) (also known as CLL-1, KLR1, and CLEC12A) is present on monocytes and granulocytes in normal peripheral blood and BM. The function of this heavily glycosylated trans-membrane C-type lectin not well established. However, there is some evidence that hMICL is involved in the control of myeloid cell activation during inflammation [14]. It has been reported that hMICL is a marker for LSCs and is a possible target in antibody-mediated anti-leukemia treatment [15].

Based on these data, our study aimed to assess the prevalence of WT1 SNP rs16754 and hMICL expression and to determine the prognostic significance of both genes in cytogenetically normal adult patients with AML.

Methods

This study included 63 patients with CN-AML. Blood samples of patients were collected in the clinical oncology department Menoufia University and haemato-oncology units of Ain Shams University Hospitals and examined in the clinical pathology department of the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University. The diagnosis and classification of AML were based on morphologic and cytochemical evaluation, immunophenotyping (IPT), and cytogenetic study according to the 2016 World Health Organization criteria for classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues [16].

Patients with poor performance status, significant comorbidities, acute promyelocytic leukemia (M3 subtype), biphenotypic leukemia, therapy-related AML, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), other hematologic diseases, and solid tumor malignancy were excluded because of the difference in their pathogenesis and survival rate in relation to other types of AML.

Either verbal or written consents were obtained from all subjects before their enrollment in the study, and conventional data were collected from the patients' medical records. The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Scientific and Ethical Committee of National Liver Institute- Menoufia University.

All studied patients were subjected to full history taking and clinical examination stressing on fever, bleeding tendency, easy fatigability, bone pain, pallor, purpuric eruptions, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, and central nervous system involvement.

Imaging studies included chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT) or chest radiography and abdominal ultrasonography. Brain CT without contrast was performed when central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage was suspected, while brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed when leukemic meningitis was suspected, and lumbar puncture was indicated (to assess CNS involvement or exclude meningitis). Assessments of cardiac risk markers and myocardial function (by echocardiogram) were conducted as induction regimens containing anthracycline.

Laboratory investigations and sampling

  1. a.

    Complete blood count was performed using Sysmex XT-1800i automated hematology analyzer (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan), and peripheral blood smear was stained by Leishman for examination.

  2. b.

    Cytochemistry and morphology were performed for peripheral blood and BM myeloid and lymphoid blast cells using Giemsa stains, myeloperoxidase reaction, and nonspecific esterase using alpha-naphthyl-acetate according to the FAB classification [17].

  3. c.

    Cytogenetic study was conducted on fresh BM samples or after 1–3 days of unstimulated culture. Metaphase chromosomes banding analysis was performed in all patients using trypsin-Giemsa method after the standard methods [18] and karyotyped in accordance with the International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature [19].

  4. a.

    IPT was performed on blast cells. The samples were used either fresh or left for 24 h at 4 °C (if fresh samples were not used for the IPT at the same day) using EPICS XL Coulter Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Hialeah, FL, USA). Monoclonal antibodies were as follows: B cell panels, CD10, CD19, CD20; T cell panel, CD2, CD5, CD7 to exclude ALL; myeloid markers, CD13, CD33, and CD14 as monocytes markers; and cytoplasmic MPO as myeloid specific marker. The nonspecific lineage-antigens HLA-DR and CD34 were used to detect the phenotypes of leukemic cells. The percentage of relevant studied markers was determined on the blast cells as a percentage of the gated blast cells. The blast cells were considered positive for the marker if > 20% of cells expressed this marker; however, intracellular MPO and CD34 expression was considered positive if > 10% of cells expressed this marker as shown in the results of Kaleem et al. [19].

  5. b.

    hMICL expression by flow cytometer. Its mean fluorescence intensity was performed on BM blast cells by EDTA blood sampling using flow cytometry (FCM). The used monoclonal antibody was phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-hMICL (CD123/hMICL/CD133/CD45) which was purchased from Miltenyi Biotech (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The vial supplied 25 μg of antibody was diluted in 1 mL saline containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide (R&D systems, Minneapolis, USA). Negative control was used (appropriately labeled according to the MoAbs used) to assess background fluorescence intensity of nonspecific MoAbs binding. Samples were considered positive for hMICL expression if expressed by ≥ 10.5% of the gated blast cells, with the negative isotope control was approximately 2% (based on data and statistics obtained from controls, the negative isotypic control was set at 2%).

  6. c.

    Genotyping of WT1 mutations. Extraction of genomic DNA from peripheral blood or BM samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions was conducted using Qiagen BioRobot M48 DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The extracted DNA was stored at − 20 °C until use for WT1 genotyping by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). After this extraction and isolation, samples were tested to DNA purity and finally stored at − 80 °C until use.

After that, PCR was performed for detection of WT1 SNP (rs16754) at exons 7 by ABI TaqMan allelic discrimination kit, catalog number of 81479 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA) using the Rotor-Gene Real-Time PCR System (QIAGEN, GmbH). The fluorescent labeled probes with the context sequence for exon 7 FAM dye for allele G: TTACTCTCTGCCTGCAGGATGTGCGAC and VIC dye for allele A: GCCGAGGCTAGACCTTCTCT. Re-genotyping of 10% of the samples was done to assess the validity of the analysis [20].

Briefly, the PCR reaction was done as the following: 10 μl of genotyping master mix (2X), 0.5 μl TaqMan assay, 5 μl, template DNA, and 4.5 μl nuclease-free H2O in a total volume of 20 μl then components were mixed gently and 15 μl of the mixture were dispensed into PCR tubes. According to the standard allelic discrimination genotyping assay protocol, the PCR tubes were placed in the cycler and the PCR cycling program was started. The PCR cycling conditions includes pre-reading of the plate where the background fluorescence is recorded followed by QIAGEN standard PCR protocol of 95 °C for 10 min, 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and repeat steps 2–3 for 40 cycles (amplification step). With completion of the PCR cycling steps, the post-readings were obtained and described according to the software of the real-time PCR instrument that then plotted. The results of the allelic discrimination run on a scatter plot of Allele 1 versus Allele 2 were shown and each well of the 36-well Rotor is represented as a single point on the plot. Finally, the intensity of fluorescence signals was analyzed by Rotor-Gene Q software series and the readings of allelic discrimination plate were analyzed then the allele types were detected.

Therapy and follow-up of the enrolled patients

Induction therapy (3 + 7 protocol) was given as follows: Adriamycin (25 mg/m2 IV/15 min) infusion for 3 days, after which cytarabine was administered (100 mg/m2/12 h) for 7 days. After achieving CR, the patients were provided three consolidation courses at monthly intervals as continuous IV infusion over 3 h on days 1, 3, and 5 with a dose of ARA-C cytarabine (3 g/m2 every 12 h) [21].

After 3 months of induction and consolidation therapy, patients were evaluated by clinical examination, peripheral blood, and BM aspirate.

Patient’s clinical outcome

Patients were assessed at day 28 of induction therapy and then classified into the following: (1) complete remission (CR) (BM blasts < 5%, absence of circulating blasts, absence of extramedullary disease, absolute neutrophil count > 1.0 × 109/L, and platelet count > 100 × 109/L) and (2) partial remission (PR) (all hematologic criteria of CR; decrease of BM blast percentage to 5–25% and decrease of pretreatment BM blast percentage by at least 50%). The patients were classified according to the 2017 ELN AML recommendations as follows: favorable clinical outcome (CR) and unfavorable clinical outcome (PR and death) [22]. All patients were followed-up to 6 and 24 months (for living patients) to assess the prognostic impact of hMICL receptor expression and WT1 gene polymorphism.

Statistical methods

Results were statistically analyzed using statistical package of social sciences (SPSS16.00 IBM/SPSS Inc., and Chicago, IL). Categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentage, Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables or alternatively, and Fisher’s exact test was used when Chi-square assumptions were violated. Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD), Student t test was used for comparing normality distributed variables, and Kruskal-Wallis or Mann-Whitney tests were applied for non-parametric equivalent. Overall survival (OS) and relapse risk were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. For overall survival, patients were censored at last follow-up if alive or at the time of allogeneic transplantation. All survival analyses were performed using a Cox model regression and adjusted on protocol as covariate. A P-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

The study included 63 patients with AML, consisting of 36 men and 27 women, with mean age of 47.92 ± 14.64 years. Splenomegaly was noted in 23 patients (36.5%), hepatomegaly was found in 19 patients (30.2%), while lymphadenopathy was observed in 19 patients (30.2%). The mean survival rate of the patients was 10.29 ± 7.54 (Table 1). Other laboratory details are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Descriptive demographic, clinical data of 63 cases of AML

hMICL receptor expression was positive in 55 (87.3%) patients with AML with a mean ± SD of 64.41 ± 29.67. Genotyping of WT1 showed that the AA (wild genotype) was the most prevalent genotype and present in 46 (73%) patients with AML, followed by AG genotype in 15 (23.8%) patients, while the least prevalent genotype is the GG genotype, which was noted in 2 patients (3.2%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Frequency of immunophenotyping, hMICL, and WT1 genotyping in AML cases

Regarding patient’s response to therapy at day 28, 17 patients (27.0%) died, and 20 (31.7%) had CR, while 26 (41.3%) had PR. At 6 months after therapy, 26 (41.3%) patients died, 11 (17.4%) developed relapse, and 26 (41.3%) achieved CR. At the end of the follow-up period, 37 (58.7%) patients died or developed relapse, while 26 (41.3%) patients maintained CR (Table 3).

Table 3 Response to therapy and patient’s outcome in all AML cases

In the comparison between WT1 AA (wild) and WT1 mutant (AG + GG) genotypes of patients with AML, CR was achieved in 17 (100%) patients with mutant (AG + GG) genotypes but only in 6.4% of patients with wild genotype (AA) (p = 0.001). After 6 months, CR was recorded in 15 (88.2%) patients with mutant WT1 type, which is more significant than in patients with wild type (23.4%) (p = 0.001).

The final response event to therapy showed that patients with mutant type significantly achieved higher CR (88.2%) than patients with wild type (21.3%), while death and relapse were more frequent in patients with wild subtype (p = 0.001).

In contrast, all other parameters (age, sex, organomegaly, lymphadenopathy, AML phenotype, and other AML-IPT panels) were not different between mutant and wild types, except for CD117, which showed marginal significant relationship (p = 0.047) to patients with AA genotype (wild type) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison between WT1 genotyping and AML patients’ data

Correlations between hMICL receptor expression and data of patients with AML revealed that eight (100%) patients with negative hMICL receptor expression achieved CR at day 28 of therapy, which is significantly increased compared to 12 (21.8%) with positive expression (p < 0.001).

At 6 months, all negative cases for hMICL receptor expression had maintained CR, which is significantly increased compared to cases with positive expression (p = 0.001). The final event of therapy response recorded that all negative cases of hMICL receptor expression were still in CR.

Splenomegaly was more frequent among positive cases of hMICL receptor expression (36 [65.5%]). On the other hand, there was no statistically significant relation between hMICL receptor expression and other clinical features of patients such as age, sex, hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy, AML phenotype, and other IPT panels, except for Table 5.

Table 5 Comparison between hMICL expression and AML patients’ data

As shown in Table 6, there was no statistically significant difference between WT1 genotypes and other data (age, sex, and laboratory data). There was a significant increase in the survival months in patients with mutant genotypes (GG and AG) compared to patients with wild type (AA) (18.9 ± 4.6 months vs. 7.1 ± 5.7 months and p-value = 0.001) (Fig. 1).

Table 6 Comparison between WT1 genotyping and hMICL expression to basal laboratory data of AML patients
Fig. 1
figure1

Kaplan-Meier survival curve in AML patients with wild and mutant WT1 genotypes

There was a significant decrease in blast count in patients with positive hMICL receptor expression compared to that in patients with negative expression (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001 respectively). No significant difference was found between other data (age, sex, and laboratory data) and hMICL receptor expression (Table 6).

Overall survival (OS) in patients who had positive hMICL receptor expression was 8.6 ± 6.5 months, which was significantly shorter compared to that in patients with negative hMICL receptor expression (χ2 = 9.328, p = 0.002) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure2

Kaplan-Meier survival curve in AML patients with positive and negative hMICL receptor expressions

Discussion

CN-AML is the largest cytogenetic group of AMLs. Understanding the pattern of gene mutation in this patient group has an increasing influence on prognosis, treatment, and options for MRD [4]. WT1 is highly expressed in various types of leukemia, which has advanced its position as both a target for immunotherapy and a means of monitoring MRD [23].

The most important issue of the IPT in AML is the lack of constancy of antigen expression during the disease and that antigen densities for many antigens are identical on leukemic blasts and normal progenitors [24].

hMICL is a stable marker at diagnosis and during follow-up and is homogenously present on the CD34-positive patients, who can be otherwise poorly lineage-characterized IPT and difficult to monitor for MSD [25].

The current study investigated the relationship between WT1 genotypes and the promising marker hMICL receptor expression in 63 patients with CN-AML and determined the treatment outcome in these patients.

Regarding genotyping of WT1, the current study showed that the minor (mutant) allele of WT1 SNP rs16754 was found in 26.89% of patients with AML at the heterozygous state (AG), and in 23.8% of patients with homozygous state (GG), while the wild type (AA) was reported in 57.14% of patients with AML.

These frequencies are like those previously reported by Renneville et al. [26], who found that the minor allele of WT1 SNP rs16754 was expressed in 141 of 511 (27.6%) patients, at the heterozygous state (AG) in 123 patients (24%) and homozygous state (GG) in 18 patients (3.6%).

The same frequencies were reported by Hollink et al., Damm et al., and Ho et al. [27,28,29] However, in an old study by King-Underwood and Pritchard-Jones, they reported that mutations in WT1 occurred in only 10–15% of patients [30].

In the current study, CR was achieved in all AML cases with mutant AG plus GG WT1 genotypes. Also, the OS in mutant WT1 was significantly longer compared to that in wild type (AA). These findings suggest a favorable outcome for patients with mutant WT1 genotypes.

Our results agreed with those of Megías-Vericat et al. who reported in their meta-analysis that both 5 years survival and disease-free survival (DFS) were significantly higher in patients with the variant allele (G) although they did not find any significant effect of this variant on CR [1]. Similar results were reported by Long et al. [11] and Petiti et al. [31].

Similarly, two studies by Damm et al. and Ho et al., one performed in adult CN-AML and the other in pediatric AML, reported that the minor allele of WT1 SNP rs16754 significantly improved clinical outcome [28, 29].

However, a large cancer and leukemia group study reported by Becker et al. found that patients with CN-AML who had the rs16754 (WT1GG) genotype had a more favorable outcome among a subset of patients with FLT3-ITD [32].

Choi et al. in a Korean cohort study revealed that the different genotypes of rs16754 did not have any significant impact on clinical outcome in CN-AML [33].

Similarly, Rennevill et al., Ramzi et al., and Marcucci et al. found no significant difference between patients with wild and variant alleles based on CR and relapse as well as OS and DFS and adults and Hollink et al. found no prognostic impact of this SNP in pediatric AML [26, 27, 34, 35]. This difference can be explained by differences in sample size, laboratory methods racial, and age variations.

Niavarani et al. found good prognostic effect of another WT1 mutation, which is WT1 rs2234593 variant mutation. This supports our finding that exon 7 mutation of this gene carries good prognosis for CN-AML [21].

On the contrary, King-Underwood and Pritchard-Jones suggested that WT1 mutation may represent a poor prognostic indicator in AML [30]. In support of this study, Nyvold et al. noted the emergence of a WT1-mutated subclone following therapy, suggesting that mutation of WT1 could lead to progression of leukemia by conferring drug resistance [36]. Furthermore, Fitzgibbon et al. reported an association between acquired uniparental disomy of 11p and homozygous mutation of WT1 in patients with AML [37].

Owen et al. found a possible negative impact in AML with concurrent WT1 and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutations [38]. This discrepancy may be explained by three reasons: First, their AML cases had FLT3-ITD in addition to WT1 mutation and combined cytogenetic abnormality. Second, they used a clustering of mutations to exons in WT1 by fluorescence-based capillary electrophoresis analysis, which has provided different results. Lastly, their group included AML and ALL together in the survival analysis.

Of note, WT1 SNP rs16754 status did not correlate with the total WT1 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression level in two previous studies [28, 29]. In addition, the SNP of WT1 (rs16754) consists of the replacement of a CGA by a CGG codon, which is used two times more often than the CGA to encode arginine.

Thus, the presence of the WT1 SNP rs16754 is increasing the rate of translation, which potentially affects protein folding. The location of WT1 rs16754 in exon 7 SNP rs16754 may not affect the splicing process [26].

The role of SNP rs16754 cannot exclude its possibility in linkage disequilibrium with another genetic aberration that affects drug metabolism and sensitivity. Confounding factors related to patient and disease characteristics, such as age, study restriction to CN-AML, and other accompanying genetic alterations may account for the discordant results recorded regarding the impact of WT1 SNP rs16754 genotype on prognosis.

Differences in treatment protocols between cooperative groups may also be responsible for these contradictory results. The various dosages of cytarabine in post-remission treatment for AML were shown to be related to somatic molecular abnormalities Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene (RAS) mutations [39]. One can hypothesize that leukemic cells harboring WT1 SNP rs16754 minor allele may be more sensitive to treatment by cytarabine, which was used in our current study.

Additionally, no significant relationship was detected between pretreatment patient parameters (age, sex, organomegaly, lymphadenopathy, AML phenotype, or other AML-IPT panels) and mutant or wild type. In agreement with our findings, Renneville et al. [26] and Schmid and his colleagues failed to correlate WT1 gene expression with other features of leukemia [40].

In the current study, we found that hMICL receptor expression was positive on leukemic cells in most patients with CN-AML. In agreement with our finding, van Rhenen et al. acknowledged hMICL as a surface antigen expressed on aCD34-positive AML and considered the antigen as a possible target in antibody-mediated therapy [41]. Several studies suggest that the routine use of hMICL can increase the value of FCM in diagnosis of AML [42].

Furthermore, Larsen et al. reported that hMICL was found in approximately 92% of studied patients with AML patients. Also, they reported that it was absent on lymphoid blast cells in all studied cases suggesting its specificity and potential value as a marker to discriminate AML from ALL in a routine FCM examination and revealed the validity of this antigen as a stable pan-AML marker that can increase both the diagnostic accuracy and MRD marker identification by FCM in AML cases during therapy and treatment follow-up [14].

To explore the prognostic impact of hMICL expression, response to treatment analysis revealed that all patients with negative hMICL expression achieved CR at day 28 of therapy and maintained CR till the end of follow-up period (24 months).

However, there was no statistically significant difference between hMICL expression and patients features, such as age, sex, hepatomegaly, lymphadenopathy, AML phenotype, and other IPT panels.

In agreement with our results, Bakker et al. recorded no significant difference between hMICL expression and different FAB subtypes studied, except for M3 cases, which recorded the highest expression of hMICL [43].

The OS was significantly longer in patients with negative hMICL expression compared to patients with positive hMICL expression. This suggested its important role in the selection of cases with good response to therapy.

In contrast to our results, Roug et al. found no relationship between disease remission and hMICL percentage expression [15]. Also, Eissa et al. found stable expression of hMICL through the disease and questioned the value of hMICL-based IPT in detection of treatment failure, which unfortunately happens in most patients with AML [44].

The current study had some limitations due to the small number of patients and short follow-up period so a larger study with longer follow-up period is recommended.

Conclusion

WT1 SNP rs16754 has significant impact on clinical outcome of CN-AML. This would allow rapid selection of patients with good prognosis suitable for chemotherapy protocol. Because of conflicting data in the literature, further large-scale studies are needed to clarify the relationship between WT1 mutations and treatment outcome in AML to firmly establish their prognostic significance in AML. Additionally, the current data identify hMICL as an AML-associated antigen and establish its possible applicability for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with AML in a standard FCM setting.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

AML:

Acute myeloid leukemia

CR:

Complete remission

BM:

Bone marrow

MRD:

Minimal residual disease

CN-AML:

Cytogenetically normal-acute myeloid leukemia

WT1:

Wilms tumor 1

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

hMICL:

Human myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor

LSCs:

Leukemic stem cells

ALL:

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia

MDS:

Myelodysplastic syndrome

CT:

Computed tomography

CNS:

Central nervous system

IPT:

Immunophenotyping

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PR:

Partial remission

OS:

Overall survival

DFS:

Disease-free survival

FLT3-ITD:

FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3- internal tandem duplication

mRNA:

Messenger ribonucleuc acid

RAS:

Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene

References

  1. 1.

    Megías-Vericat JE, Herrero MJ, Rojas L, Montesinos P, Bosó V, Moscardó F, Martínez-Cuadrón D, Poveda JL, Sanz MÁ, Aliño SF (2016 Feb) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of WT1 polymorphism rs16754 in the effectiveness of standard chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. The pharmacogenomics journals. 16(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/tpj.2015.80

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Zhou F, Chen B (2018 Oct 21) Acute myeloid leukemia carrying ETV6 mutations: biologic and clinical features. Hematology. 23(9):608–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245332.2018.1482051

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bachas C, Schuurhuis GJ, Assaraf YG, Kwidama ZJ, Kelder A, Wouters F, Snel AN, Kaspers GJL, Cloos J (2012 Jun) The role of minor subpopulations within the leukemic blast compartment of AML patients at initial diagnosis in the development of relapse. Leukemia. 26(6):1313–1320. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.383

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang J, Wang W, Chen H, Li W, Huang T, Zhang W, Ling W, Lai P, Wang Y, Geng S, Li M (2021) C-type lectin-like molecule-1 as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia: a preliminary study. BioMed research international. 12:2021

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Paietta E. Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: coming of age. Hematology 2010, the American Society of Hematology Education Program Book. 2012 Dec 8;2012(1):35-42.

  6. 6.

    Paietta E (2012) When it comes to MRD, AML≠ ALL. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 120(8):1536–1537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vora A, Goulden N, Wade R, Mitchell C, Hancock J, Hough R, Rowntree C, Richards S (2013) Treatment reduction for children and young adults with low-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia defined by minimal residual disease (UKALL 2003): a randomised controlled trial. The lancet oncology. 14(3):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70600-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ariyaratana S, Loeb DM (2007) The role of the Wilms tumour gene (WT1) in normal and malignant haematopoiesis. Expert reviews in molecular medicine. 9(14):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1462399407000336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maurer U, Brieger J, Weidmann E, Mitrou PS, Hoelzer D, Bergmann L (1997) The Wilms’ tumor gene is expressed in a subset of CD34+ progenitors and downregulated early in the course of differentiation in vitro. Experimental hematology. 25(9):945–950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gaidzik VI, Schlenk RF, Moschny S, Becker A, Bullinger L, Corbacioglu A, Krauter J, Schlegelberger B, Ganser A, Döhner H, Döhner K, German-Austrian AML Study Group (2009) Prognostic impact of WT1 mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a study of the German-Austrian AML Study Group. Blood. 113(19):4505–4511. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-10-183392

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Long J, Fang S, Dai Q, Liu X, Zhu W, Wang S (2016) The Wilms tumor-1 (WT1) rs16754 polymorphism is a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 7(22):32079–32087. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.8117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cilloni D, Renneville A, Hermitte F, Hills RK, Daly S, Jovanovic JV, Gottardi E, Fava M, Schnittger S, Weiss T, Izzo B, Nomdedeu J, van der Heijden A, van der Reijden BA, Jansen JH, van der Velden VHJ, Ommen H, Preudhomme C, Saglio G, Grimwade D (2009) Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of minimal residual disease by standardized WT1 assay to enhance risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia: a European LeukemiaNet study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 27(31):5195–5201. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.22.4865

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ujj Z, Buglyó G, Udvardy M, Beyer D, Vargha G, Biró S, Rejtő L (2016) WT1 expression in adult acute myeloid leukemia: assessing its presence, magnitude, and temporal changes as prognostic factors. Pathology & Oncology Research. 22(1):217–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-015-0002-0

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Larsen HØ, Roug AS, Just T, Brown GD, Hokland P (2012) Expression of the hMICL in acute myeloid leukemia—a highly reliable disease marker at diagnosis and during follow-up. Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry. 82(1):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.b.20614

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Roug AS, Larsen HØ, Nederby L, Just T, Brown G, Nyvold CG, Ommen HB, Hokland P (2014) h MICL and CD 123 in combination with a CD 45/CD 34/CD 117 backbone–a universal marker combination for the detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia. British journal of haematology. 164(2):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12614

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM et al (2016) The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 127(20):2391–2405. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DA, Gralnick HR (1985) at al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia: a report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Annals of internal medicine. 103(4):620–625. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-103-4-620

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wan TS (2014) Cancer cytogenetics: methodology revisited. Annals of laboratory medicine. 34(6):413–425. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.6.413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kaleem Z, Crawford E, Pathan MH, Jasper L, Covinsky MA, Johnson LR, White G (2003 Jan) Flow cytometric analysis of acute leukemias: diagnostic utility and critical analysis of data. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine. 127(1):42–48. https://doi.org/10.5858/2003-127-42-FCAOA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Opitz JM. Book review ISCN 2013: An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature (2013). Shaffer LG, McGowan-Jordan J, Schmid M, editors. Published in collaboration with Cytogenetic and Genome Research by Karger, Basel. VI and 140 pp. plus fold-out, 11 Fig. 4 tables.

  21. 21.

    Niavarani A, Horswell S, Sadri R, Bonnet D (2016) The Wilms Tumor-1 (WT1) rs2234593 variant is a prognostic factor in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia. Annals of hematology. 95(2):179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2534-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dillman RO, Davis RB, Green MR, Weiss RB, Gottlieb AJ, Caplan S, et al. A comparative study of two different doses of cytarabine for acute myeloid leukemia: a phase III trial of Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

  23. 23.

    Yang L, Han Y, Saiz FS, Minden MD (2007) A tumor suppressor and oncogene: the WT1 story. Leukemia. 21(5):868–876. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404624

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li X, Du W, Liu W, Li X, Li H, HUANG SA (2010) Comprehensive flow cytometry phenotype in acute leukemia at diagnosis and at relapse. Apmis. 118(5):353–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02603.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kern W, Bacher U, Haferlach C, Schnittger S, Haferlach T (2010) The role of multiparameter flow cytometry for disease monitoring in AML. Best practice & research Clinical haematology. 23(3):379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beha.2010.06.007

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Renneville A, Boissel N, Helevaut N, Nibourel O, Terré C, Pautas C, Gardin C, Thomas X, Turlure P, Reman O, Berthon C, Dombret H, Castaigne S, Preudhomme C (2011) Wilms’ tumor 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs16754 does not predict clinical outcome in adult acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 25(12):1918–1921. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2011.173

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hollink IH, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Zimmermann M, Balgobind BV, Arentsen-Peters ST, Alders M et al (2010) No prognostic impact of the WT1 gene single nucleotide polymorphism rs16754 in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 28(28):e523–e526. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.29.3860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Damm F, Heuser M, Morgan M, Yun H, Großhennig A, Göhring G, Schlegelberger B, Döhner K, Ottmann O, Lübbert M, Heit W, Kanz L, Schlimok G, Raghavachar A, Fiedler W, Kirchner H, Döhner H, Heil G, Ganser A, Krauter J (2010) Single nucleotide polymorphism in the mutational hotspot of WT1 predicts a favorable outcome in patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 28(4):578–585. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.23.0342

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ho PA, Kuhn J, Gerbing RB, Pollard JA, Zeng R, Miller KL, Heerema NA, Raimondi SC, Hirsch BA, Franklin JL, Lange B (2011) WT1 synonymous single nucleotide polymorphism rs16754 correlates with higher mRNA expression and predicts significantly improved outcome in favorable-risk pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children's oncology group. Journal of clinical oncology. 29(6):704–711. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.9327

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    King-Underwood L, Pritchard-Jones K (1998) Wilms’ tumor (WT1) gene mutations occur mainly in acute myeloid leukemia and may confer drug resistance. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. 91(8):2961–2968

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Petiti J, Rosso V, Iacono ML, Calabrese C, Signorino E, Gaidano V et al (2018) Prognostic significance of the Wilms’ tumor-1 (WT1) rs16754 polymorphism in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia research. 67:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2018.01.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Becker H, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrózek K, Metzeler KH, Whitman SP et al (2011) Clinical outcome and gene-and microRNA-expression profiling according to the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) single nucleotide polymorphism rs16754 in adult de novo cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. haematologica 96(10):1488

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Choi Y, Lee JH, Hur EH, Kang MJ, Kim SD, Lee JH, Kim DY, Lim SN, Bae KS, Lim HS, Seol M, Kang YA, Lee KH (2012) Single nucleotide polymorphism of Wilms’ tumor 1 gene rs16754 in Korean patients with cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. Annals of hematology. 91(5):671–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1355-4

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ramzi M, Moghadam M, Cohan N (2019) Wilms tumor-1 (WT1) rs16754 polymorphism and clinical outcome in acute myeloid leukemia. Turkish Journal of Haematology. 36(1):67–68. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjh.galenos.2018.2018.0277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Marcucci G, Haferlach T, Döhner H (2011) Molecular genetics of adult acute myeloid leukemia: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 29(5):475–486. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.2554

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nyvold CG, Stentoft J, Braendstrup K, Melsvik D, Moestrup SK, Juhl-Christensen C et al (2006) Wilms’ tumor 1 mutation accumulated during therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: biological and clinical implications. Leukemia. 20(11):2051–2054. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404389

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fitzgibbon J, Smith LL, Raghavan M, Smith ML, Debernardi S, Skoulakis S, Lillington D, Lister TA, Young BD (2005) Association between acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous gene mutation in acute myeloid leukemias. Cancer research. 65(20):9152–9154. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2017

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Owen C, Fitzgibbon J, Paschka P (2010) The clinical relevance of Wilms tumour 1 (WT1) gene mutations in acute leukaemia. Hematological oncology. 28(1):13–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.931

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Neubauer A, Maharry K, Mrózek K, Thiede C, Marcucci G, Paschka P, Mayer RJ, Larson RA, Liu ET, Bloomfield CD (2008) Patients with acute myeloid leukemia and RAS mutations benefit most from postremission high dose cytarabine: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Journal of clinical oncology. 26(28):4603–4609. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0418

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Schmid D, Heinze G, Linnerth B, Tisljar K, Kusec R, Geissler K, Sillaber C, Laczika K, Mitterbauer M, Zöchbauer S, Mannhalter C, Haas OA, Lechner K, Jäger U, Gaiger A (1997) Prognostic significance of WT1 gene expression at diagnosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 11(5):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2400620

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Van Rhenen A, Moshaver B, Kelder A, Feller N, Nieuwint AW, Zweegman S et al (2007) Aberrant marker expression patterns on the CD34+ CD38− stem cell compartment in acute myeloid leukemia allows to distinguish the malignant from the normal stem cell compartment both at diagnosis and in remission. Leukemia. 21(8):1700–1707. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2404754

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Majeti R (2011 Mar) Monoclonal antibody therapy directed against human acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Oncogene. 30(9):1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.511

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bakker AB, van den Oudenrijn S, Bakker AQ, Feller N, van Meijer M, Bia JA et al (2004) C-type lectin-like molecule-1: a novel myeloid cell surface marker associated with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer research. 64(22):8443–8450. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1659

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Eissa DS, Kandeel EZ, Ghareeb M (2017) Human myeloid inhibitory C-lectin: a highly specific and stable acute myeloid leukemia marker. Hematological oncology. 35(4):814–820. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.2352

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for their participation and cooperation.

Funding

No funds

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SG and MA analyzed and interpreted the patient data regarding the hematological disease, treatment, and follow-up. HB and HR performed the laboratory work. FK and SB interpreted the data. All authors equally contributed to writing the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzy F. Gohar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Either verbal or written consents were obtained from all subjects before their enrollment in the study. The study protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Scientific and Ethical Committee of National Liver Institute, Menoufia University. The committee’s reference number is not available.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bedair, H.M., Attia, M.H., Gohar, S.F. et al. The prognostic impact of Wilms tumor-1 polymorphism (rs16754) and human myeloid inhibitory C-type lectin-like receptor expression in cytogenetically normal-acute myeloid leukemia. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 22, 64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-021-00183-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Acute leukemia
  • Myeloid neoplasm
  • Cytogenetic
  • Genotypes
  • Prognosis
  • Wilms’ tumor