- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Metformin reduces the cellular DNA repair capacity and enhances the effect of curcumin on the induction of apoptosis in AGS gastric cancer cells
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics volume 24, Article number: 63 (2023)
Abstract
Background
Cancer results from the accumulation of mutations in critical genes, such as DNA repair genes. But these genes are a double-edged sword, because the basis of current cancer treatment is DNA damage from chemotherapy and radiation, and the repair system can slow the healing process by repairing the induced damage. Therefore, any substance that can reduce the DNA repair capacity of cancer cells can make the cells more sensitive to treatment. Metformin and curcumin, as low-complication compounds, can play this role well.
Methods
In the present work, changes in the expression of CASP3, BAX, and BCL2L1 apoptotic genes, and nine genes involved in DNA repair pathways (XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, XRCC5, XRCC6, XRCC7, BRCA1 and BRAC2) were measured comparatively by real-time PCR in AGS gastric cancer cell line under single and co-treatments with metformin and curcumin.
Results
Our findings showed that co-treatment of metformin and curcumin induced decreasing the expression of anti-apoptotic BCL2L1 and increasing expression of proapoptotic CASP3 and BAX. Metformin decreased the expression levels of seven genes, while curcumin did not alter the expression levels. The co-treatment of metformin and curcumin showed that although the XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, XRCC5, XRCC6, XRCC7, BRCA1, and BRCA2 were down-regulated, there was no difference between metformin and co-treatment for mRNA levels.
Conclusion
Our results suggest that metformin increases the sensitivity of cancer cells to anticancer drugs by suppressing several DNA repair pathways and that curcumin may induce apoptosis.
Introduction
Alterations in cellular DNA repair capacity play a critical role in the onset, progression, and even response to cancer treatment [1]. Because anti-cancer therapies, including ionizing radiation and chemotherapy, are based on DNA damage, regulating the DNA damage response may lead to tumor susceptibility to treatment or resistance to genotoxic agents. Therefore, targeting DNA repair pathways may be a potential therapeutic approach to cancer treatment [2].
Metformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus and the most widely used drug for this disease worldwide. Numerous epidemiologic studies have shown a significant association between the use of metformin in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a reduction in the risk of many types of cancer [3, 4]. Metformin, in addition to its protective role in cancer, induces apoptosis and inhibits the proliferation of many cancer cells, tumorigenesis, tumor progression in vivo, metastasis, and angiogenesis [5, 6]. On the other hand, metformin improves the response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, reduces the anticancer drug resistance in diabetic patients with breast cancer, and increases the sensitivity of cancer cells to drugs [7]. Also, metformin protects the skin against UVB damage by reducing its DNA repair capacity [8].
Curcumin is the main active ingredient of turmeric (Curcuma longa) and has antioxidant, antiseptic, antiseptic, antiseptic effects [9]. Epidemiological studies attribute the reduction in cancer incidence to the curcumin-rich diets [10]. The results of treating cells with curcumin show that it inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis [11]. Also, studies proved the induction of DNA damage and the reduction of the expression of DNA repair genes by curcumin in different cancer cell lines [12]. Although the anticancer effects of curcumin have been confirmed in population-based studies regardless of its molecular pathways, there are inconsistencies in the performance of curcumin in various laboratory studies. Studies indicate its protective role against DNA damage as well as reduced DNA repair capacity, especially in the expression of genes involved in double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways [13].
X-ray cross-complementing (XRCC) and breast cancer (BRCA) genes play a role in various pathways of DNA repair pathways [14, 15]. XRCC1 is involved in the base excision repair (BER) pathway; in addition, XRCC2, XRCC3, BRCA1, and BRCA2 are involved in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, and XRCC4, XRCC5, XRCC6, and XRCC7 are active in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). BRCA1 works jointly in NHEJ repair, the nucleotide excision repair (NER), HR pathways [14]; however, BRCA2 has a more specific role in DNA repair [15]. Damaged eukaryotic cells are not repaired, but are removed by apoptosis. Increasing the expression of proapoptoses, especially caspase-3 (CASP3) as a “point of no return”, and/or decreasing anti-apoptotic proteins in the Bcl-2 protein family, such as BCL2L1, can shift the balance in favor of cell death after DNA damage treatment [16]. We have previously observed the dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of metformin and curcumin on AGS gastric cancer cell line. Also, based on Chou-Talalay method, it was found that metformin and curcumin with a ratio of 1:625 in 72 h could have a strong synergistic interaction. Furthermore, the results of our previous study showed that metformin and curcumin could inhibit the EMT mechanisms by impeding cell migration and invasion, as well as colony formation; these changes were significantly higher in combination treatments. Furthermore, the combination of metformin and curcumin significantly and selectively increased the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy drugs on the cancer cell line compared to the normal cell line [17]. According to these results and as the changes in DNA repair capacity and cell apoptosis potential are affected by EMT changes and cancer progression, changes in the expression of genes involved in these pathways were investigated.
Due to the contradictions in the studies and the lack of reports on the effect of curcumin and metformin combination on DNA repair genes in a gastric cancer cell line, our present study aimed at investigating this area.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Metformin powder (Santa Cruz, USA) was dissolved in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (Merck, Germany), and curcumin powder (Merck, Germany) was dissolved in DMSO (Shellmax, China). To test cytotoxicity, Cell Proliferation Kit (MTT) was prepared from Roche Company. Human AGS gastric cancer cell line was prepared from National Cell Bank of Iran and cultivated in RPMI 1640 culture medium (Bio-idea, Iran) enriched with (10% v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 100 units/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Bio-idea, Iran) under standard conditions of a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. RNX-Plus Solution for total RNA isolation was purchased from Cinagen (Iran) and cDNA synthesis kit from Takara (Japan). RealQ Plus Master Mix Green was provided by Ampliqon (Denmark).
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and gene expression analysis
The concentrations used for metformin (0.625 mM) and curcumin (1 μM) were selected based on the Chou synergistic relationship with a combined index <1 (CI = 0.3), so that the viability of the cells under single treatments was more than 97%, while it decreased to about 60% in combined treatments. Based on previous observations, these values were used to examine the gene expression changes [17]. AGS gastric cancer cells (5 × 105) were treated with metformin, curcumin, and their combination for 72 h. Total RNA was extracted and cDNA was synthesized. Altered gene expression patterns were detected by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in a Rotor-Gene 6000 instrument (Corbett, Australia) with the thermal profile as follows one step of 95 °C for 15 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. XRCC1, XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC4, XRCC5, XRCC6, XRCC7, BRCA1, and BRAC2 genes as well as CASP3, BAX and BCL2L1 genes were studied in our study. Primer sequences designed with the aid of AllelID software version 7.0 are summarized in Table 1. GAPDH gene was considered as the reference gene and alterations in gene expression were determined by 2−ΔΔCt method [18].
Statistical analysis
All experiments were done in triplicate. The data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were carried out via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's post hoc test using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS, Inc., USA) with a significance level of less than 0.05 (p < 0.05).
Results
Combination of metformin and curcumin alters the expression of apoptotic genes in favor of apoptosis
Our results demonstrated that treatment with metformin and curcumin induced decreasing the expression of anti-apoptotic BCL2L1 gene and increasing expression of proapoptotic CASP3 and BAX genes. Although these expressional alterations were observed in single treatments, co-treatment with metformin and curcumin significantly changed the expression patterns towards apoptosis (Fig. 1). In summary, metformin treatment did not cause a significant change in the expression of apoptotic genes; however, curcumin treatment increased the expression of BAX gene by 8.6-fold and decreased the expression of BCL2L1 anti-apoptotic gene by 0.57-fold compared to the untreated control cell. However, their combination treatment showed a significant increase in proapoptotic CASP3 (2.8-fold) and BAX (15-fold) genes and a decrease in BCL2L1 anti-apoptotic expression (0.76-fold). The BAX/BCL2L1 ratio in curcumin (20-fold) and co-treatment (86-fold) increased significantly (Fig. 1).
Metformin and curcumin reduce the DNA repair capacity in AGS cancer cells
In the present study, changes in the mRNA levels of nine genes involved in DNA repair pathways were examined in AGS cells treated with metformin and curcumin (Fig. 2). Single treatment with metformin during 72 h showed that the expression levels of XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC5, XRCC6, XRCC7, BRCA1, and BRCA2 significantly decreased. In single treatment with curcumin, the alteration of mRNA levels was not statistically significant. The combined treatment of metformin and curcumin also demonstrated a significant decrease in the expression of XRCC2, XRCC3, XRCC5, XRCC6, XRCC7, BRCA1, and BRCA2 genes. There was no significant difference between the studied mRNA levels of metformin and co-treatment of metformin and curcumin, indicating that curcumin has no effect on the expression levels of the examined DNA repair genes.
Discussion
In the present report, we provided evidence of the effect of metformin and curcumin on the expression levels of three genes involved in apoptosis and nine genes involved in DNA repair pathways. In this study, the selected DNA repair genes show a wider range of activity in DNA damage response.
Combination therapy and interests in low-complication and natural compounds are new topics in cancer research and treatment, and the study of the simultaneous effect of curcumin and metformin in recent years has received special attention. Our previous results showed that metformin and curcumin could synergistically reduce the survival of gastric cancer cells and significantly inhibit migration, invasion, and colony formation. Therefore, changes in the expression of genes involved in DNA repair and apoptosis were expected [17].
Examination of apoptotic genes expression patterns showed that single treatment with curcumin induced apoptosis due to up-regulation of BAX and down-regulation of BCL2L genes. In co-treatment of metformin and curcumin, CASP3 and BAX genes were up-regulated and BCL2L1 gene was down-regulated. The BAX/BCL2L1 ratio, an index of apoptosis induction [16], increased more than 4 times compared to single-curcumin treatment and up to 82 times compared to the untreated control cells (Fig. 1). Therefore, co-treatment may increase apoptosis in the AGS cells. This is in accordance with the results of the cytotoxicity test in MTT assay and explains those results. In a similar study, it has been reported that the combination of metformin and curcumin induced apoptosis in LNCaP [19].
In the present study, investigation of changes in the expression of DNA repair genes shows that although metformin alone and in low non-cytotoxic doses can reduce the repair capacity, curcumin and its combination with metformin did not significantly alter the expression of DNA repair genes. Consistent with our results, other studies show that curcumin has no effect at concentrations below 14 μM [20] and the effects of curcumin are dose- and time-dependent [21], as reflected in our MTT results.
Our results showed that curcumin alters the expression of apoptotic genes, while having no effect on the expression of DNA repair genes. In contrast, metformin only reduced the expression of DNA repair genes. Inhibiting the DNA repair pathway and inducing apoptosis are ways to make cancer treatment more effective. Based on the link between DNA repair pathways and cancer progression, a new treatment strategy is being considered to increase the effect of DNA-damaging agents through DNA repair inhibitors. Our findings suggested that metformin increased the sensitivity of cancer cells to anticancer drugs by suppressing several DNA repair pathways, and that curcumin could induce apoptosis and accelerate cancer cell death. As demonstrated in our previous study, metformin and curcumin enhanced the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs [17]. This could be the basis for further studies to investigate the anti-cancer effects of metformin and curcumin.
Conclusions
Our current results show that curcumin may increase the expression of proapoptotic genes and by downregulation of the anti-apoptotic gene, it can sensitize AGS cells to apoptosis. Metformin potentiated this effect of curcumin. Metformin also reduced DNA repair capacity by reducing the expression of genes involved in DSB repair. Reducing the repair capacity and facilitating the onset of apoptosis can provide insights into cancer treatment.
Availability of data and materials
The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ANOVA:
-
ANalysis of VAriance
- BAX:
-
Bcl-2-Associated X
- BCL2L1:
-
Bcl-2-like 1
- BER:
-
Base Excision Repair
- BRCA:
-
BReast CAncer gene
- CASP3:
-
Caspase 3
- DSB:
-
Double-Strand Break
- HR:
-
Homologous Recombination
- IC50 :
-
Half maximal Inhibitory Concentration
- NER:
-
Nucleotide Excision Repair
- NHEJ:
-
Non-Homologous End Joining
- SEM:
-
Standard Error of Mean
- SD:
-
Standard Deviation
- XRCC:
-
X-Ray Cross-Complementing
References
Clementi E, Inglin L, Beebe E, Gsell C, Garajova Z, Markkanen E (2020) Persistent DNA damage triggers activation of the integrated stress response to promote cell survival under nutrient restriction. BMC Biol 18(1):1–15
Li L-y, Guan Y-d, Chen X-s, Yang J-m, Cheng Y (2021) DNA repair pathways in cancer therapy and resistance. Front Pharmacol 11:2520
Kim YI, Kim S, Cho SJ, Park JH, Choi IJ, Lee YJ et al (2014) Long-term metformin use reduces gastric cancer risk in type 2 diabetics without insulin treatment: a nationwide cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 39(8):854–863
Zhou X-L, Xue W-H, Ding X-F, Li L-F, Dou M-M, Zhang W-J et al (2017) Association between metformin and the risk of gastric cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Oncotarget 8(33):55622
Buzzai M, Jones RG, Amaravadi RK, Lum JJ, DeBerardinis RJ, Zhao F et al (2007) Systemic treatment with the antidiabetic drug metformin selectively impairs p53-deficient tumor cell growth. Can Res 67(14):6745–6752
Vázquez-Martín A, Oliveras-Ferraros C, del Barco S, Martín-Castillo B, Menéndez JA (2009) mTOR inhibitors and the anti-diabetic biguanide metformin: new insights into the molecular management of breast cancer resistance to the HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib (Tykerb®). Clin Transl Oncol 11(7):455–459
Jiralerspong S, Palla SL, Giordano SH, Meric-Bernstam F, Liedtke C, Barnett CM et al (2009) Metformin and pathologic complete responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in diabetic patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27(20):3297
Wu C, Qiang L, Han W, Ming M, Viollet B, He Y-Y (2013) Role of AMPK in UVB-induced DNA damage repair and growth control. Oncogene 32(21):2682
Aggarwal BB, Sundaram C, Malani N, Ichikawa H (2007) Curcumin: the Indian solid gold. Adv Exp Med Biol 595:1–75
Mohandas K, Desai D (1999) Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India. V. Large and small bowel. Indian J Gastroenterol 18(3):118–121
Dorai T, Cao YC, Dorai B, Buttyan R, Katz AE (2001) Therapeutic potential of curcumin in human prostate cancer III Curcumin inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis, and inhibits angiogenesis of LNCaP prostate cancer cells in vivo. Prostate 47(4):293–303
Ting C-Y, Wang H-E, Yu C-C, Liu H-C, Liu Y-C, Chiang I-T (2015) Curcumin triggers DNA damage and inhibits expression of DNA repair proteins in human lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res 35(7):3867–3873
Cao J, Jia L, Zhou H-M, Liu Y, Zhong L-F (2006) Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA damage induced by curcumin in human hepatoma G2 cells. Toxicol Sci 91(2):476–483
Thacker J, Zdzienicka MZ (2003) The mammalian XRCC genes: their roles in DNA repair and genetic stability. DNA Repair 2(6):655–672
Tutt A, Ashworth A (2002) The relationship between the roles of BRCA genes in DNA repair and cancer predisposition. Trends Mol Med 8(12):571–576
Raisova M, Hossini AM, Eberle J, Riebeling C, Orfanos CE, Geilen CC et al (2001) The Bax/Bcl-2 ratio determines the susceptibility of human melanoma cells to CD95/Fas-mediated apoptosis. J Investig Dermatol 117(2):333–340
Zarei E, Sefidi-Heris Y, Saadat I (2021) Synergistic effects of metformin and curcumin on cytotoxicity of chemotherapy drugs using a gastric cancer cell line model. EXCLI J 20:1488–1498
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25(4):402–408
Eslami SS, Jafari D, Montazeri H, Sadeghizadeh M, Tarighi P (2021) Combination of curcumin and metformin inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis without affecting the cell cycle in LNCaP prostate cancer cell line. Nutr Cancer 73(6):1026–1039
Srinivasan M, Prasad NR, Menon VP (2006) Protective effect of curcumin on γ-radiation induced DNA damage and lipid peroxidation in cultured human lymphocytes. Mutation Res Genetic Toxicol Environ Mutagen 611(1–2):96–103
Van Erk MJ, Teuling E, Staal YC, Huybers S, Van Bladeren PJ, Aarts JM et al (2004) Time-and dose-dependent effects of curcumin on gene expression in human colon cancer cells. J Carcinogen 3:8
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all who participated in this study.
Funding
This work was supported by Shiraz University (97GCU3M1740).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.Z. performed the experiment and data analysis, and writing—original draft preparation. I.S. designed the research and performed writing and editing the manuscript and supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University with the Ethics Code: ECBD-SU-9430318.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zarei, E., Saadat, I. Metformin reduces the cellular DNA repair capacity and enhances the effect of curcumin on the induction of apoptosis in AGS gastric cancer cells. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 24, 63 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-023-00445-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-023-00445-7