Skip to main content
Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
Download PDF

Dysregulation in growth arrest-specific 5 and metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 gene expression predicts diagnosis and renal fibrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics volume 22, Article number: 3 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Biomarkers that enhance overall diagnosis and prognosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have a growing need to be recognized. The use of long non-coding ribonucleic acids (lncRNAs) as biomarkers in this regard is still largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate lncRNA [metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (MALAT1) and growth arrest-specific 5 (GAS5)] expression in SLE patients with/without nephritis. Their relation to disease activity/chronicity changes has been identified. A total of 40 SLE patients and 40 healthy controls were tested using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for expression levels of MALAT1 and GAS5.

Results

MALAT1 expression was aberrantly upregulated, while GAS5 was downregulated in patients with SLE versus controls. GAS5 relative expression was significantly downregulated in lupus nephritis (LN) patients compared to non-lupus nephritis (NN) patients. GAS5 was also correlated with glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and hypertension.

Conclusion

The lncRNA (GAS5 and MALAT1) may serve as diagnostic biomarkers for SLE. Moreover, GAS5 may distinguish SLE LN patients from NN patients and may predict renal fibrosis in LN patients.

Background

SLE is a complex autoimmune disease defined by the existence of autoantibodies, which are reactive antibodies produced by the immune system to recognize one or more of individual proteins, deposition of immune complex, and excess proinflammatory cytokine. This causes serious damage to various organ systems [1]. Biomarkers facilitate diagnosis and prognosis [2] because of the heterogeneous presentation and unpredictable course of SLE patients. The use of lncRNAs as biomarkers in this regard is still mostly unexplored [3]. LncRNAs is a class of endogenous cellular RNAs with lengths greater than 200 nucleotides, and they are not translated into proteins. They lie within protein-coding gene intergenic stretches or overlap antisense transcripts [2]. They are quite numerous and involved in almost all aspects of cell biology such as cell differentiation, cell proliferation, and response to DNA damage [4].

They also play a defined role in numerous multi-genetic human diseases such as cancer and neurological diseases. They currently attract many researchers to their role in autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis and SLE [5].

MALAT1, also known as nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 2 (NEAT2) or alpha, is a highly conserved lncRNA [6]. This gene was first identified in 2003. It was found in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells with high expression levels [7]. It is highly regulated in various cancer forms: endometrial cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma [8]. Moreover, even normal physiological processes of cells are associated with MALAT1 [9]. GAS5 is a lncRNA, which competes with glucocorticoid response elements (GREs). Since glucocorticoids are powerful immunosuppressants, increased expression of lncRNAGAS5 in immune cells can suppress glucocorticoid action and can make a significant contribution to autoimmune diseases [10]. Although the precise pathophysiology of SLE remains unknown, its multifactorial etiology is well-known, involving mainly genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors [1, 11]. Recent studies emphasize the role of lncRNAs and low protein-coding potential in SLE pathogenesis [12, 13]. However, these studies are few, and further studies shall be conducted to support diagnostic and prognostic utility in SLE.

The present study aimed to evaluate the expression of long non-coding RNA gene (MALAT1 and GAS5) in SLE patients with/without nephritis and study their relation to disease activity and chronicity changes.

Methods

The study includes 40 SLE–LN/NN patients enlisted in the author’s hospital outpatient clinics and 40 age-matched and sex-matched in healthy controls between October 2017 and October 2019. A written consent is obtained from all individuals concerned with this study, and it is approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC).

All SLE patients have met the SLE classification requirements of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) [14, 15]. Both clinical examination and laboratory investigations were done. The Score of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) for each patient is determined during blood withdrawal [2]. Depending on the SLEDAI results, patients were divided into patients with active disease (scores > 4) or patients with inactive disease (scores < 4) [16]. SLE renal involvement was defined according to ACR criteria, depending on nephritis presence/absence. All LN patients have undergone a kidney biopsy. The study excluded concurrent infection patients. Healthy controls did not have any autoimmune diseases or treatment by immunosuppressive agents.

Five millimeters of blood was collected from each subject in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) collection tubes. Peripheral mononuclear blood cell (PBMC) isolation was done using Histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich) Ficoll density-gradient centrifugation according to the manufacturer instructions.

Total RNA, including lncRNA, was extracted by the TRIzol reagent from PBMCs (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used to determine the concentrations of RNA. The reversed transcript on the RNA was performed using SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis Kit [Bioline, Memphis, TN] with a 20 ml final reaction volume. The expression levels of MALAT1 and GAS5 lncRNAs were evaluated according to the internal control, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), using a Hera Plus SYBR Green qPCR Kit (Willow Fort, Birmingham, UK) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Fold change was calculated using the comparative threshold cycle [2−ΔΔCt] for relative quantification which is normalized to an endogenous control [17]. The PCR primer sequences were as follows: MALAT1 forward primer, GAATTGCGTCATTTAAAGCCTAGTT and reverse primer, GTTTCATCCTACCACTCCCAATTAAT; GAS5 forward primer, CTTCTGGGCTCAAGTGATCCT and reverse primer, TTGTGCCATGAGACTCCATCAG; GAPDH forward primer, ACAGTCAGCCGCATCTTCTT and reverse primer, GACAAGCTTCCCGTTCTCAG. Real-time PCR was performed using 7500 Real-Time PCR Systems [Applied Biosystems] under the following conditions: 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 60 s.

Statistical analysis

Social Science Software Computer Program version 26 [SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA] was used to analyze obtained data. Non-parametric data were presented by the median and interquartile range, while means and standard deviation were used for parametric data. Student’s t test was used to compare quantitative parametric data, while Mann-Whitney U test was used for quantitative non-parametric data. On the other hand, Kruskal-Wallis H test was followed by Dunn’s post hoc test for pair-wise comparison. Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher exact test was used to compare qualitative data, and Spearman correlation was used to correlate different parameters. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also used to determine the diagnostic power of each test. The statistically relevant p value < 0.05 was regarded.

Results

The expression levels of lncRNAs (MALAT1 and GAS5) in PBMCs taken from 40 patients with SLE and 40 healthy controls were measured using RT-qPCR.

MALAT1 mRNA transcripts were higher in SLE patients compared to controls (p < 0.001) (Table 1, Fig. 1a). There were also significant differences between LN and NN patients compared to controls (p = <0.001) (Table 1, Fig. 1c). However, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to MALAT1 in LN patients relative to NN patients (p = 0.25) (Table 2).

Table 1 Comparison of GAS5 and MALAT1 relative expression in all studied groups
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The relative expression of GAS5 and MALAT1 between SLE patients and controls a MALAT1 relative expression between SLE groups versus controls. MALAT1 expression is significantly higher in SLE patients compared to control group (p = < 0.001). b GAS5 relative expression between SLE groups versus controls. GAS5 expression was significantly lower than the control group (p = < 0.001). c MALAT1 relative expression between two SLE subgroups, nephritis, and non-nephritis versus controls showed a significant difference in LN and NN patients compared to control cases (p = < 0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in LN patients compared to NN (p = 0.25). d GAS5 relative expression between the two SLE subgroups, nephritis, and non-nephritis versus controls showed a significant difference in LN patients compared to control groups (p = < 0.001). In addition, GAS5 showed significant downregulation in LN patients compared to NN patients (p = 0.003). Red, SLE cases; blue, control group; yellow, NN; green, LN; p, p value. The central box in the diagram represents the lower and upper quartiles (IQR). The central horizontal line in the box represents the median

Full size image
Table 2 Clinical and laboratory characteristics of the study patients
Full size table

The expression of GAS5 was significantly lower in SLE patients as compared to controls (p < 0.001) (Table 1, Fig. 1b). Also, the expression of GAS5 was decreased significantly in patients with LN compared with healthy donors and patients with NN (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) (Tables 1 and 2, Fig. 1d).

SLE subgroups showed a significant difference in clinical/laboratory characteristics including blood pressure (p = 0.007), urinary output (UOP) (p < 0.001), proteinuria (p < 0.001) and serum creatinine (p = 0.004), and casts present in the urine (p < 0.001), and SLEDAI score (p = 0.001) (Table 2).

There was no correlation among lncRNA (GAS5 and MALAT1) expression, activity markers, including anti-dsDNA titers, complement level c3 and c4, and other hematological parameters. In addition, SLEDAI score was not correlated to MALAT1 relative expression, but it was positively correlated to GAS5 relative expression in the NN subgroup (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between GAS5, MALAT1, and clinical and laboratory variables
Full size table

GAS5 expression was significantly correlated to glomerulosclerosis (p = 0.044), interstitial fibrosis (0.028), and tubular atrophy degree (p = 0.031). This might be attributed to GAS5 association with chronicity pathological markers in LN patients. On the other hand, it showed no significant correlation with any of the renal histopathological activity parameters, including endocapillary hypercellularity, cellular crescents, fibrinoid necrosis, karyorrhexis, and active interstitial infiltration (Table 4).

Table 4 Correlation between GAS5, MALAT1, and histopathological markers of activity and chronicity
Full size table

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to discriminate SLE patients from healthy controls using MALAT1 and GAS5 gene expression as discrimination marker (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

ROC curve studying the validity as diagnostic biomarker a relative expression of GAS-5 in all cases vs. control groups area under curve [AUC] 0.725, p value 0.001*. b Relative expression of MALAT1 in all cases vs. control groups AUC 0.929 p value < 0.001*. c Relative expression of GAS5 control vs. con-nephritis. d Relative expression of MALAT1 control vs. non-nephritis AUC 0.95, p value < 0.001*. e Relative expression of GAS5 control vs. nephritis AUC 0.94, p value < 0.001*. f Relative expression of MALAT1 control vs. nephritis AUC 0.91, p value < 0.001*. g Relative expression of GAS5 nephritis vs non-nephritis AUC 0.77 p value (0.004*). h Relative expression of MALAT1 nephritis vs non-nephritis. AUC, area under curve; p, probability. *Significance < 0.05

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, we investigated lncRNA expression (MALAT1 and GAS5) in SLE patients with/without nephritis. We found that the lncRNA (MALAT1) was aberrantly expressed in comparison with healthy controls, while GAS5 expression levels in SLE patients was significantly reduced in comparison with controls. Results suggested that MALAT1 and GAS5 plasma levels could serve as potential biomarkers for SLE.

Previously, it has been shown that lncRNA (GAS5)—which is important for normal growth, apoptosis, and cell cycle function—was consistent with an increased risk of developing SLE in a mouse model [18]. GAS5 was also involved in human SLE development [19]. Previous studies have indicated that GAS5 is significantly lower in SLE patients compared to healthy controls [20, 21].

It has been found that MALAT1 expression increases abnormally in SLE patients. Previous studies have proven that MALAT1 was involved in Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) signaling regulation, which contributes to lupus disease initiation and maintenance [22]. SIRT1 expression was reduced significantly after MALAT1 knockdown, which suggested its main regulatory function in SLE pathogenesis [23, 24]. The role of other lncRNAs (NEAT2, CTC-471 J1.2, and lnc-DC) was investigated in LN patients in previous reports [25]. To investigate whether GAS5 and MALAT1 expression is related to renal affection in SLE, we contrasted their relative expression levels in SLE patients with/without nephritis. Our findings showed that GAS5 relative expression in LN patients is significantly downregulated compared to patients with NN. This indicates that GAS5 could be used as a biomarker to distinguish the SLE with/without LN.

GAS5 relative expression was significantly associated with the degree of glomerulosclerosis, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy. This may indicate an association between the dysregulated lncRNA [GAS5] and poor renal outcomes.

By further investigations on the correlation of lncRNA (GAS5, MALAT1) with SLEDAI-2 K score between LN and NN, a positive correlation was found between GAS5 and SLEDAI-2 K score in the NN subgroup, not in the LN subgroup. Currently, there is no study exploring GAS5 association and lupus activity in differentiating between patients with/without nephritis. This observation needs to be further studied to clarify this point.

lncRNA (GAS5) was negatively correlated to blood pressure in NN group, which denotes the higher risk of hypertension in SLE patients with downregulated GAS5. This can be explained by the previous observation of GAS5 inhibitory effect on the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, for which it can serve as a potential hypertension therapeutic target [26]. Considering GAS5 as a potential biomarker for hypertension has been previously elucidated in animal models [27].

This research may have many limitations. First is examining patients from only one hospital, which may limit finding generalization. Second, potential confounding factors such as different treatment strategies among patients should be considered in data interpretation. To reveal the exact further function of these lncRNAs in SLE and further evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic efficacy in lupus nephritis, future studies must be conducted.

Conclusion

The lncRNA (GAS5 and MALAT1) may serve as diagnostic biomarkers for SLE. Moreover, GAS5 may distinguish SLE LN patients from NN patients and may predict renal fibrosis in LN patients.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

GAS5:

Growth arrest-specific 5

LncRNA:

Long non-coding RNA

MALAT1:

Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1

PBMCs:

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

SLE:

Systemic lupus erythematosus

LN:

Lupus nephritis

NN:

Lupus non-nephritis

SLEDAI:

Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index

Anti-dsDNA:

Anti-double stranded DNA

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

References

  1. Rahman A, Isenberg DA (2008) Mechanisms of disease. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med 358:929–939

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang L-K, Chen X-F, He D-D, Li Y, Fu J (2017) Dissection of functional lncRNAs in Alzheimer’s disease by construction and analysis of lncRNA–mRNA networks based on competitive endogenous RNAs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 485(3):569–576

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wu Y, Zhang F, Ma J, Zhang X, Wu L, Qu B et al (2015) Association of large intergenic noncoding RNA expression with disease activity and organ damage in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 17(1):131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gibb EA, Brown CJ, Lam WL (2011) The functional role of long non-coding RNA in human carcinomas. Mol Cancer 10(1):38

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sigdel KR, Cheng A, Wang Y, Duan L, Zhang Y (2015) The emerging functions of long noncoding RNA in immune cells: autoimmune diseases. J Immunol Res 848790

  6. Ma X-Y, Wang J-H, Wang J-L, Ma CX, Wang X-C, Liu F-S (2015) Malat1 as an evolutionarily conserved lncRNA, plays a positive role in regulating proliferation and maintaining undifferentiated status of early-stage hematopoietic cells. BMC Genomics 16(1):676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ji P, Diederichs S, Wang W, Böing S, Metzger R, Schneider PM et al (2003) MALAT-1, a novel noncoding RNA, and thymosin β 4 predict metastasis and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 22(39):8031–8041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Michalik KM, You X, Manavski Y, Doddaballapur A, Zörnig M, Braun T et al (2014) Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 regulates endothelial cell function and vessel growth. Circ Res 114(9):1389–1397

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Watts R, Johnsen VL, Shearer J, Hittel DS (2013) Myostatin-induced inhibition of the long noncoding RNA Malat1 is associated with decreased myogenesis. Am J Physiol-Cell Physiol 304(10):C995–C1001

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Suo QF, Sheng J, Qiang FY, Tang ZS, Yang YY (2018) Association of long non-coding RNA GAS5 and miR-21 levels in CD4+ T cells with clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus. Exp Ther Med 15(1):345–350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teruel M, Alarcón-Riquelme ME (2016) The genetic basis of systemic lupus erythematosus: what are the risk factors and what have we learned. J Autoimmun 74:161–175

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Atianand MK, Hu W, Satpathy AT, Shen Y, Ricci EP, Alvarez-Dominguez JR et al (2016) A long noncoding RNA lincRNA-EPS acts as a transcriptional brake to restrain inflammation. Cell. 165(7):1672–1685

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu G-C, Hu Y, Guan S-Y, Ye D-Q, Pan H-F (2019) Differential plasma expression profiles of long non-coding RNAs reveal potential biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus. Biomolecules 9(6):206

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tansey E, Lupus S, Gladman D, Esdaile J, Urowitz M (1999) Guidelines for referral and management of systemic lupus erythematosus in adults. Arthritis Rheum. American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc Committee on Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Guidelines

  15. Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcón GS, Gordon C, Merrill JT, Fortin PR et al (2012) Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 64(8):2677–2686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB (2002) Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol 29(2):288–291

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc 3(6):1101

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Haywood M, Rose S, Horswell S, Lees M, Fu G, Walport M et al (2006) Overlapping BXSB congenic intervals, in combination with microarray gene expression, reveal novel lupus candidate genes. Genes Immun 7(3):250–263

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Suarez-Gestal M, Calaza M, Endreffy E, Pullmann R, Ordi-Ros J, Sebastiani GD et al (2009) Replication of recently identified systemic lupus erythematosus genetic associations: a case–control study. Arthritis Res Ther 11(3):R69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wu G-C, Li J, Leng R-X, Li X-P, Li X-M, Wang D-G et al (2017) Identification of long non-coding RNAs GAS5, linc0597 and lnc-DC in plasma as novel biomarkers for systemic lupus erythematosus. Oncotarget 8(14):23650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mayama T, Marr A, Kino T (2016) Differential expression of glucocorticoid receptor noncoding RNA repressor Gas5 in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Horm Metab Res 48(08):550–557

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li Z, Chao T-C, Chang K-Y, Lin N, Patil VS, Shimizu C et al (2014) The long noncoding RNA THRIL regulates TNFα expression through its interaction with hnRNPL. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(3):1002–1007

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang H, Liang N, Wang M, Fei Y, Sun J, Li Z et al (2017) Long noncoding RNA MALAT-1 is a novel inflammatory regulator in human systemic lupus erythematosus. Oncotarget 8(44):77400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao C-N, Mao Y-M, Liu L-N, Li X-M, Wang D-G, Pan H-F (2018) Emerging role of lncRNAs in systemic lupus erythematosus. Biomed Pharmacother 106:584–592

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saleh AA, Kasem HE, Zahran E, El-Hefnawy SM (2020) Dysregulation of cell-free long non-coding RNAs [NEAT2, CTC-471 J1.2 and lnc-DC] in Egyptian systemic lupus and lupus nephritis patients. Meta Gene 24:100665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu K, Liu C, Zhang Z (2019) lncRNA GAS5 acts as a ceRNA for miR-21 in suppressing PDGF-bb-induced proliferation and migration in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem 120(9):15233–15240

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu Y, Zhang Z, Ren S, Li K, Ning Q, Jiang X (2019) Aberrant expression of long noncoding RNAs in the serum and myocardium of spontaneous hypertensive rats. Mol Biol Rep 46(6):6399–6404

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Manal M. El-Desoky, Nora Mostafa & Mona Elhelaly

  2. Nephrology Department, Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Rasha S. Shemies

  3. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Amany S. El-Bahnasawy

Authors
  1. Manal M. El-Desoky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rasha S. Shemies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Amany S. El-Bahnasawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nora Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mona Elhelaly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ME, NM amd ME designed the research and performed the experiments. RS and AE recruited the patients and processed the samples. All authors analyzed the data, shared in writing the manuscript, and read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manal M. El-Desoky.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mansoura Faculty of Medicine with approval number [R. 20.01.731]. Informed written consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Desoky, M.M., Shemies, R.S., El-Bahnasawy, A.S. et al. Dysregulation in growth arrest-specific 5 and metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 gene expression predicts diagnosis and renal fibrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 22, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-020-00112-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-020-00112-1

Keywords

  • Growth arrest-specific 5
  • Long non-coding RNA
  • Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus