Skip to main content

A study of the genotyping and vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphism differences in diabetic and diabetic retinopathy patients



Retinopathy is one of the major causes of visual impairment which is the most severe microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and two SNPs (− 152G > A and − 165C > T) located in the promoter region of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene in a small sample from Egyptian population. One hundred diabetic patients without retinopathy (DWR) and two hundred diabetic patients with retinopathy were included in this study. Genotype analysis for the two SNPs (− 152G > A and − 165C > T) was assessed by using the PCR–RFLP technique. In addition, the serum protein level of VEGF was measured by ELISA assay.


The results showed a significant relationship between − 152G > A (rs13207351) polymorphism and both proliferative and non-proliferative retinopathy in genotypes (GG, GA, AA). The risk factor increment in the mutant heterozygous genotype (GA) was significantly increased in NPDR compared to PDR (OR = 16.3, 95%CI = 0.80–331.7); (OR = 20.4, 95%CI = 1.08–385.3), respectively. There was no significance between VEGF − 165C > T (rs79469752) gene polymorphism and retinopathy. Moreover, the serum protein level of VEGF showed a highly significant increase (P = 0.0001) in PDR (Mean ± SD = 3691 ± 124.9) when compared to both DWR (Mean ± SD = 497.3 ± 18.51) and NPDR (Mean ± SD = 1674.5 ± 771.7). These results were supported by the increased level of VEGF in serum protein which is positively correlated with the severity of retinopathy. Measuring VEGF protein level in DR patients would help as a biomarker in early diagnosis.


The increase in the mutant heterogeneous GA genotype in VEGF − 152G > A SNP could be a risk factor for the progression of severe retinopathy in diabetic patients.


Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an ocular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) causing a microvascular complications of the retina of the eye; causing vascular severe complications in the eye and represents a major cause of blindness around the world [1,2,3]. Without advanced treatment, DR evolved from mild-NPDR, to moderate and then to severe NPDR, finally to PDR [4, 5]. DR is known as a stage of proliferation that characterized by the formation of new blood vessels, anterior retinal hemorrhage, leading to vision loss [1].

Genetic factors may play a role in the pathogenesis and prevalence of DR in different ethnic populations [6]. Consequently, it is important to identify molecular markers that may help in the diagnosis of DR in various populations [7]. The human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of these risky genetic factors that plays a critical role in angiogenesis [8] observed in several ophthalmic diseases including PDR [9]. VEGF gene is located on chromosome 6 (6p21.3) and consists of 8 exons and 7 introns. It is a polymorphic gene with several single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 5′-untranslated region (UTR), 3′-UTR, and promoter regions [10].

Many literatures have studied (− 152G > A and − 165C > T) SNPs in the promoter region of VEGF gene in numerous diseases, included DR [11, 12]. Yet, the two SNPs were poorly studied in Egyptian patients. Hence the aim of this study was to establish the genetic risk factor between two SNPs (− 152G > A and − 165C > T) in relation to diabetic retinopathy among Egyptian patients.

Patients and methods

A total of 300 of DM patients who attend diabetes polyclinic of Research Institute of Ophthalmology (RIO) Hospital, Giza, Egypt, between April 2018 and December 2019; all were willing to participate in this study upon written consent form in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (WMA Declaration of Helsinki 2013), Also the protocol was approved by the RIO Ethical Committee on 4/7/2021. The 300 DM patients were classified into 100 diabetic patients without retinopathy (DWR) and 200 diabetic retinopathy patients were later classified into 100 diabetic patients with proliferative retinopathy (PDR) and 100 diabetic patients with non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR), all the DM patients have a funduscopic examination in the ophthalmology clinic using fundus biomicroscopic using a 90-diopter lens by slit lamp examination.

A history of all patients determined the duration of the disease and age followed by blood samples were withdrawn from all patients for testing random blood sugar, (RBS) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) to confirm DM all are presented in Table 1. All the diabetic patients were on diabetic medication of insulin and oral tablets. VEGF protein levels was measured by ELISA and VEGF gene polymorphisms for − 152G > A and − 165C > T SNPs using the Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (PCR–RFLP).

Table 1 Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the diabetic patients with and without retinopathy

Inclusion criteria

Participants diagnosed to have DM with and without DR were also included in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Participants with severe medical conditions congestive heart failure, liver disease, malignancy, inflammatory process, pregnancy and, with local eye diseases cataract and glaucoma or uveitis. Participants with diabetic duration less than 5 years. Finally, when declined to sign the consent form.

Laboratory investigations for biochemical and genotyping

Five milliliter of venous blood was obtained from patients with DM then divided into two portions, 2 ml added to EDTA tube for HbA1c test and for the genotyping assay, and the remaining of the 3 ml was saved for the routine laboratory investigations. HbA1c was assessed according to the method of, using glycosylated hemoglobin (GHb) Kit of Spectrum Diagnostics Co., (Egypt). Plasma glucose was measured according to the method of, using glucose—liquizyme GOD-PAP (Single Reagent) Kit of Spectrum Diagnostics Co., (Germany). Serum VEGF was also, measured by using ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) kit, according to the manufacture’s recommendation with commercially available kit (Bioassay Technology Laboratory Yangu Dist. Shanghai. China).

DNA extraction

Peripheral blood samples were collected from all participants (2 ml blood from each) on EDTA-rinsed vacationer tubes. Genomic DNA was extracted by spin-column based kit, Qiagen (QIAamp Whole Blood Genomic DNA Purification Mini Kit), blood DNA extraction kit according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit). The final samples were kept at − 30 °C until use.

PCR conditions

The PCR reaction included the enzyme Taq DNA polymerase, dNTPs, and PCR buffer. Where each 25 µl of the PCR reaction contained: Genomic DNA 3 µl, PCR buffer 2.5 µl, Forward primer 2 µl, Reverse primer 2 µl, Taq polymerase 0.5 µl, dNTPs 2.5 µl and nuclease free H2O 12.5 µl. PCR was carried out on a BiometraTM Thermal Cycler, (Model: TProfessional Basic).

Determination of the VEGF genotypes

Both VEGF polymorphisms SNPs were detected using primers containing a single base-pair mismatch adjacent to the polymorphic site in order to introduce a restriction site into the wild-type nucleotide sequences after amplification.

− 152G > A polymorphism was determined using a PCR–RFLP technique based protocol as described by [12] We use forward primer 5′-TCCTGCTCCCTCCTCGCCAATG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GGCGGGGACAGGCGAGCCTC-3′. The reaction was amplified on a thermal cycler (BiometraTM thermalcycler), where the cycles was programmed as follows: 10 min at 95 °C followed by 35 cycls for 1 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles for 1 min at 62 °C, 35 cycles for 1 min at 72 °C, and 5 min at 72 °C.

The PCR product was then digested with 1 µl of the restriction enzyme Fast Digest HpyF3I (Ddel) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 30 min at 37 °C.

The − 165C > T polymorphism was determined by using the same technique with the same conditions as mentioned above.

The PCR product was then digested with 1 µl of the restriction enzyme Fast Digest MvaI (BstNI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 30 min at 37 °C.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses of data were done by using Statistical Package for Social Science Version 22 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). Qualitative variables expressed as number and percentage. Quantitative variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was defined as P value ≤ 0.05. For quantitative data, a student t-test was used to compare between two groups. Chi-square test and Fisher's exact test were used for qualitative data.

Odds ratio and 95% confidence interval used to assessed the associations between the VEGF polymorphisms and DR susceptibility, [7].


The distributions of demographic and clinical characteristics of diabetic patients in all groups are represented in Table 1. The DWR group had a shorter duration of DM (11.21 ± 4.26) and were younger (45.6 ± 11.3) than patient with NPDR (56.4 ± 8.3) and PDR (54.4 ± 10.2).

There was a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the plasma level of HbA1c in retinopathy groups (NPDR = 8.92 ± 1.43; PDR = 9.03 ± 1.5) when compared to the DWR group (6.7 ± 1.06). Also, the serum level of VEGF increased significantly (P < 0.05) in both NPDR (1674.5 ± 771.7) and PDR (3691 ± 124.9) when compared with the DWR group (497.3 ± 18.51). However, RBS showed a significant increase (P < 0.05) in PDR rather than NPDR when compared to DWR which represented in Table 1.

VEGF gene rs13207351 (− 152G > A) polymorphism

There was a highly significant increase in GA genotype distribution in both retinopathy groups versus DWR (NPDR: OR = 16.3, CI = 0.80–331.7 and PDR: OR = 20.43, CI = 1.08–385.3). While, the AA genotype distribution showed a significant decrease in retinopathy groups (NPDR: OR = 0.17, CI = 0.04–0.65; PDR: OR = 0.12, CI = 0.03–0.42) versus DWR. The GG genotype distribution was non-significant in NPDR (P = 0.14) when compared with DWR. But, it was on the edge of significance in PDR OR = 3.90, CI = 1.05–14.48 versus DWR. Haplotype analysis revealed a strong evidence of an association for − 152G > A SNP with DR. The risk factor for the progression of retinopathy increased significantly with G allele in NPDR OR (CI) = 4.29 (1.62–11.37); PDR OR (CI) = 18.06 (7.32–44.52). The frequency of haplotype G was 64% in PDR group P = 0.004 and 29% in NPDR P = 0.0001. Meanwhile, A allele showed a significant decrease in NPDR OR (CI) = 0.23 (0.09–0.61) and PDR 0.05 (0.02–0.14) when compared with DWR (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2 VEGF gene polymorphisms in NPDR patients and DWR
Table 3 VEGF gene polymorphisms in PDR patients and DWR

The presence of a G to A transition at position-152 introduced a restriction site that, the PCR product band at 204 bp, after digestion, three types of bands were observed—a complete HpyF3I(Ddel) cut representing homozygous VEGF (− 152G/G), resulting in two fragments of 143 and 61 bp (GG); a partial cut representing heterozygous VEGF (-152G/A), resulting in three fragments of 204, 143 and 61 bp (GA); and an uncut 204 bp (AA) fragment representing homozygous VEGF (− 152A/A) were visualized on a 2% agarose gel (Figs. 1, 2 and 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The product of the PCR polymerase chain reaction amplification of − 152G > A and-165C > T VEGF polymorphisms represented in lane 1, 3, 4. Lane M marker represents ladder 100 bp

Fig. 2
figure 2

Digestion products for − 152 G > A VEGF polymorphism by Ddel restriction enzyme, samples was electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. Lane M represents ladder 100 bp. Lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 represent AA mutant genotype (one band at 204 bp)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Digestion products for − 152G > A VEGF polymorphism by Ddel restriction enzyme, samples were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. Lane M represents ladder 100 bp. The G allele was cut into two fragments of 61 and 143 bp, whereas the A allele remained uncut (204 bp). Lane 9 and 10 represent GA genotype (three bands at 61, 143 and 204 bp). Lanes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 represent GG genotype (two bands at 61 and 143 bp)

VEGF gene rs79469752 (− 165C > T) polymorphism

There was no significant difference in genotype distribution and allele frequency in the DR groups (NPDR and PDR) when compared to DWR group (Tables 2 and 3).

The presence of a C to T transition at position-165 introduced a restriction site that, the PCR product band at 204 bp, after digestion, three types of bands were observed a complete MvaI (BstNI) cut representing homozygous VEGF (− 165C/C), resulting in two fragments of 130 and 74 bp (CC); a partial cut representing heterozygous VEGF (− 165C/T), resulting in three fragments of 204, 130 and 74 bp (CT); and an uncut 204 bp (TT) fragment representing homozygous VEGF (− 165 T/T) were visualized on a 2% agarose gel (Figs. 1 and 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Digestion products for − 165C > T VEGF polymorphism by BstNl restriction enzyme, samples were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel. Lane M represents ladder 100 bp. The C allele was cut into two fragments of 74 and 130 bp, whereas the T allele remained uncut (204 bp). Lane 3 represents CT genotype (three bands at 74, 130 and 204 bp). Lanes 1, 4, 5, 6 represent CC genotype (two bands at 74 and 130 bp). Lane 2 represent TT mutant genotype (one band at 204 bp)


Diabetic retinopathy ruins the most collective reason of visual impairment in controlled – aged individuals. Hyper glycaemia is the main critical factor that causes a severe ocular complications (retinopathy) associated with diabetes [13]. The progression of diabetic retinopathy is influenced by both genetic and environmental agents [2, 14, 15].

In the present study, an elevated HbA1c level, for longer duration of diabetes and an increment in mean age were detected in NPDR and PDR. These observations were in agreement with [16,17,18] who reported that these changes may be considered as indicators of poor glycemic control and significant risk factors for development and progression of DR. Additionally, Wat et al. [15] indicated that a prolonged exposure to hyperglycemia increases the chance to develop retinopathy. An impaired adaptive responses to hypoxia could contributed to the pathophysiology of diabetes and its complication [19, 20]. Emerging evidence indicates that the conditions of diabetes cause different tissues to be hypoxic [21,22,23,24,25], including the retina [26].

Moreover, it was established that oxidative DNA damage occurs as a consequence of hypoxic exposure in different species including human subjects [27,28,29,30]. This oxidative damage could lead to genomic instability, perhaps related to acquisition of mutations [31]. Hypoxia is a major regulator of VEGF expression via hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) and other hypoxia-regulated genes which coordinate with VEGF expression and, in turn, VEGF-driven signaling [32, 33].

There are two families of polypeptides with opposed features; proangiogenic, and antiangiogenic, that produced from the splicing and proteolytic processing of VEGF transcripts [34, 35]. The disparity of balance between pro- and antiangiogenic VEGF further crucially give an explanation of the anatomic variation of the diabetic eye that may result in vision deterioration [36]. The present study has confirmed the participation of VEGF in the development of DR as suggested by previous studies [16, 37,38,39,40,41]. Moreover, the present data indicated increased levels of VEGF protein with 3.6 folds in the NPDR patients and 7.4-folds in the PDR patients compared to DWR patients. The higher level of VEGF in PDR than NPDR is in concordance with Zhou et al. [42].

Many studies investigated specific polymorphisms in the promoter and 5 untranslated region (UTR) of VEGF gene [43] which found to be associated with the risk of angiogenesis in DR [44]. In this current study a significant association of VEGF rs13207351 gene polymorphism with retinopathy in diabetic patients was noted when compared to DWR group. Therefore, VEGF − 152G > A polymorphism could be a genetic marker for sever DR in Egyptian diabetic patients. This is in agreement with previous studies by Churchill et al. [45,46,47,48] who indicated the effect of VEGF genetic variants on the severity of retinopathy through increasing VEGF expression.

A previous study by Amoah et al. [12, 49] using the same SNP − 152G > A (rs13207351) gene polymorphism in the promoter of VEGF on breast and colon cancer patients revealed the same results as in our present study. However, there was no studies concerning analyzing the behavior of the mentioned SNP in the Egyptian diabetic patients suffering from DR, and the severity of DR in the present study, GA genotype showed an increase by 1.2-fold, while G allele showed an increase by 4.5 fold in PDR compared to NPDR. The association of wild G allele with the higher risk to develop retinopathy may be explained by the shifting of gene from antiangiogenic properties to angiogenic properties Bates et al. [50, 51].The results of this study are in concordance with Marsh et al. [52] who revealed that G allele may exhibit higher expression of VEGF mRNA.

Furthermore, the AA genotype in the current work showed low risk factor for the severity of DR by 1.4-fold (OR = 0.12, CI = 0.03–0.42). On contrary, Churchill et al. [45,46,47, 53] demonstrated that AA genotype was a potential risk marker of diabetic retinopathy (OR = 3.5, CI = 1.5–7.7) in Britain and in Chinese populations (OR = 3.7, CI = 1.2–11.7).

In the present study, VEGF gene − 165C > T polymorphism have no obvious association with DR severity. This is in agreement with Amoah et al. [12, 49] who did not detect an association with breast cancer and coronary collateral vessels. We also observed non statistical difference between the three genotypes of − 165C > T polymorphism in the two diabetic groups. Nevertheless, these results were contradictory with Churchill et al. [45] where a single haplotype − 165C was significantly associated with PDR patients. This contradiction might be due to different ethnicity of the subjects or may be interrelated to other risk factors among those populations, which may need further investigation.


The present study attentive on new therapeutic strategy needed hand to hand with the health awareness to reduce the affliction associated with the common problems of diabetes in Egyptian population. The VEGF rs13207351 SNP polymorphism may be considered a reliable genetic marker for predicting DR severity. The mutant heterozygous form of GA polymorphism and Gallele at − 152 of VEGF gene might show a higher frequency of susceptibility to retinopathy as an ocular diabetic complication. However, there is no association with VEGF − 165C > T gene polymorphism. Serum VEGF are considered a biomarker for evaluating the development and progression of DR. VEGF level was strongly correlated with the NPDR and PDR, and its concentration was also found to be statistically correlated with some biochemical (HbA1c) and demographic findings (age and duration).

Further studies are needed to better our understanding of VEGF SNPs and DR susceptibility and to confirm these relationships in our societies.

Availability of data and materials

Data are presented in excel sheet as row data. They are also, included in this paper and should not be used by other authors without previous consent of the present authors (us). With our best regards.



Diabetes mellitus


Diabetic without retinopathy


Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy


Proliferative diabetic retinopathy


Vascular endothelial growth factor


Polymerase chain reaction


Restriction fragment length polymorphism


Single nucleotide polymorphisms


Research Institute Ophthalmology


Random blood sugar


Hemoglobin blood A1c


  1. Hou Y, Cai Y, Jia Z, Shi S (2020) Risk factors and prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. Med Baltim 99(42):22695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan SZ, Ajmal N, Shaikh R (2020) Diabetic retinopathy and vascular endothelial growth factor gene insertion/deletion polymorphism. Can J Diabetes 44(3):287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonetti DA, Silva PS, Stitt AW (2021) Current understanding of the molecular and cellular pathology of diabetic retinopathy. Nat Rev Endocrinol 17(4):195–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu W-J et al (2003) Assessing progression and efficacy of treatment for diabetic retinopathy following the proliferative pathway to blindness: implication for diabetic retinopathy screening in Taiwan. Diabet Med 20(9):727–733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Liao W-L et al (2018) Multilocus genetic risk score for diabetic retinopathy in the Han Chinese population of Taiwan. Sci Rep 8(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cabrera AP, Monickaraj F, Rangasamy S, Hobbs S, McGuire P, Das A (2020) Do genomic factors play a role in diabetic retinopathy? J Clin Med 9(1):216.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Han L et al (2014) The associations between VEGF gene polymorphisms and diabetic retinopathy susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 11 case-control studies. J Diabetes Res.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrara N, Gerber H-P, LeCouter J (2003) The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 9(6):669–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrara N, Adamis AP (2016) Ten years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 15(6):385–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Welch S, Spithoff K, Rumble RB, Maroun J (2010) Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol 21(6):1152–1162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapahi R et al (2014) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Punjabi population from North West India. Tumor Biol 35(11):11171–11181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Amoah V et al (2016) Vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α gene polymorphisms and coronary collateral formation in patients with coronary chronic total occlusions. SAGE Open Med 4:2050312116654403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cai J, Boulton M (2002) The pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy: old concepts and new questions. Eye 16(3):242–260

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdel-Fattah RA, Eltanamly RM, Nabih MH, Kamal MM (2016) Vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphism is not associated with diabetic retinopathy in Egyptian patients. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 23(1):75–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wat N, Wong RL, Wong IY (2016) Associations between diabetic retinopathy and systemic risk factors. Hong Kong Med J 22(6):589–599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Amer AK et al (2020) Vascular endothelial growth factor +405G/C polymorphism as a predictor of diabetic retinopathy. Bull Natl Res Centre 44(1):54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rafferty J, Owens DR, Luzio SD, Watts P, Akbari A, Thomas RL (2020) Risk factors for having diabetic retinopathy at first screening in persons with type 1 diabetes diagnosed under 18 years of age. Eye 38:2840–2847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yin L, Zhang D, Ren Q, Su X, Sun Z (2020) Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients: a community based cross-sectional study. Medicine 99(9):e19236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Semenza GL (2019) Pharmacologic targeting of hypoxia-inducible factors. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 59:379–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Catrina S-B, Zheng X (2021) Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in diabetes and its complications. Diabetologia 64:709–716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gu HF et al (2013) Impact of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 α (HIF1A) Pro582Ser polymorphism on diabetes nephropathy. Diabetes Care 36(2):415–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Persson P, Palm F (2017) Hypoxia-inducible factor activation in diabetic kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 26(5):345–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee YS et al (2014) Increased adipocyte O2 consumption triggers HIF-1α, causing inflammation and insulin resistance in obesity. Cell 157(6):1339–1352

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Botusan IR et al (2008) Stabilization of HIF-1α is critical to improve wound healing in diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(49):19426–19431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato Y et al (2011) Cellular hypoxia of pancreatic β-cells due to high levels of oxygen consumption for insulin secretion in vitro. J Biol Chem 286(14):12524–12532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Arden GB, Sivaprasad S (2011) Hypoxia and oxidative stress in the causation of diabetic retinopathy. Curr Diabetes Rev 7(5):291–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ning W, Chu TJ, Li CJ, Choi AM, Peters DG (2004) Genome-wide analysis of the endothelial transcriptome under short-term chronic hypoxia. Physiol Genomics 18(1):70–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Baze MM, Schlauch K, Hayes JP (2010) Gene expression of the liver in response to chronic hypoxia. Physiol Genomics 41(3):275–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Polotsky VY et al (2010) Intermittent and sustained hypoxia induce a similar gene expression profile in human aortic endothelial cells. Physiol Genomics 41(3):306–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Mehdi A-B et al (2012) Perinuclear mitochondrial clustering creates an oxidant-rich nuclear domain required for hypoxia-induced transcription. Sci Signal 5(231):ra47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Albertson AJ, Bohannon AS, Hablitz JJ (2017) HCN channel modulation of synaptic integration in GABAergic interneurons in malformed rat neocortex. Front Cell Neurosci 11:109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Semenza GL (2000) HIF-1: mediator of physiological and pathophysiological responses to hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 88:1474–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Semenza GL (2000) HIF-1: using two hands to flip the angiogenic switch. Cancer Metastasis Rev 19(1):59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Harper SJ, Bates DO (2008) VEGF-A splicing: the key to anti-angiogenic therapeutics? Nat Rev Cancer 8(11):880–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Biselli-Chicote PM, Oliveira A, Pavarino EC, Goloni-Bertollo EM (2012) VEGF gene alternative splicing: pro-and anti-angiogenic isoforms in cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138(3):363–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Paine SK, Mondal LK, Borah PK, Bhattacharya CK, Mahanta J (2017) Pro-and antiangiogenic VEGF and its receptor status for the severity of diabetic retinopathy. Mol Vis 23:356

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hu W, Wang R, Li J, Zhang J, Wang W (2016) Association of irisin concentrations with the presence of diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy. Ann Clin Biochem 53(1):67–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Gonzalez-Salinas R et al (2017) Evaluation of VEGF gene polymorphisms and proliferative diabetic retinopathy in Mexican population. Int J Ophthalmol 10(1):135–139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Mesquita J, Castro-de-Sousa JP, Vaz-Pereira S, Neves A, Passarinha LA, Tomaz CT (2018) Evaluation of the growth factors VEGF-a and VEGF-B in the vitreous and serum of patients with macular and retinal vascular diseases. Growth Factors 36(1–2):48–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ahuja S, Saxena S, Akduman L, Meyer CH, Kruzliak P, Khanna VK (2019) Serum vascular endothelial growth factor is a biomolecular biomarker of severity of diabetic retinopathy. Int J Retina Vitreous 5(1):1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Abu-Yaghi NE, Abu Tarboush NM, Abojaradeh AM, Al-Akily AS, Abdo EM, Emoush LO (2020) Relationship between serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels and stages of diabetic retinopathy and other biomarkers. J Ophthalmol 2020:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou Z, Ju H, Sun M, Chen H (2019) Serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels correlate with severity of retinopathy in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Markers 2019:e9401628.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Awata T et al (2005) Functional VEGF C-634G polymorphism is associated with development of diabetic macular edema and correlated with macular retinal thickness in type 2 diabetes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 333(3):679–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu L, Gong C, Chen X, Zhou H, Yan J, Hong W (2021) Associations between vascular endothelial growth factor gene polymorphisms and different types of diabetic retinopathy susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res 221:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  45. Churchill AJ et al (2008) VEGF polymorphisms are associated with severity of diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49(8):3611–3616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang X et al (2011) Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and the risk of diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Mol Vis 17:3088–3096

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang X et al (2014) Candidate gene association study for diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Mol Vis 20:200

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fan X et al (2014) Association of polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor gene and its serum levels with diabetic retinopathy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Chin Med J 127(4):651–657

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Kapahi R et al (2014) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk in Punjabi population from North West India. Tumour Biol 35(11):11171–11181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bates DO et al (2002) VEGF165b, an inhibitory splice variant of vascular endothelial growth factor, is down-regulated in renal cell carcinoma. Can Res 62(14):4123–4131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Apte RS, Chen DS, Ferrara N (2019) VEGF in signaling and disease: beyond discovery and development. Cell 176(6):1248–1264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Marsh S et al (2000) Hypoxic induction of vascular endothelial growth factor is markedly decreased in diabetic individuals who do not develop retinopathy. Diabetes Care 23(9):1375–1380.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Suganthalakshmi B et al (2006) Association of VEGF and eNOS gene polymorphisms in type 2 diabetic retinopathy. Mol Vis 12(1):336–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We express our appreciation to the Research Institute of Ophthalmology for supporting us throughout the whole study.


This project has been funded by Helwan University as a master degree program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SW performed in collecting the literature review, carried out the molecular and the biochemical techniques, analyzed and interpreted the patient data, Writing and revising the manuscript. MMH participated in revising the manuscript. KAR support in collecting medical samples from outpatients clinic, helping in revising the manuscript. AAAA provided the medical samples of patients who participated in the design of the study and contributed to revising the manuscript. OHE suggested the point of the study, participated in the design of the study, writing and revising the whole manuscript. The authors read and approved.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Wagih.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All participated in this study upon written consent form in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (WMA Declaration of Helsinki 2013), also the protocol was approved by the RIO Ethical Committee on 4/7/2021.

Consent for publication

A consent form was signed by all the 300 participants to take part in this study. The participants were informed about the purpose of the study. Only blood samples were used in this research study. A specific questionnaire was filled with all included and excluded criteria. I have saved copies from these consent forms, if you want me to upload them as a Additional files 1, 2 and 3, I will be glad to send.

Competing interests

All authors hereby declare that there is no conflict of interest associated with this publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Raw data of Diabetic without retinopathy patients.

Additional file 2.

Raw data of Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients.

Additional file 3.

Raw data of Proliferative diabetic retinopathy patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagih, S., Hussein, M.M., Rizk, K.A. et al. A study of the genotyping and vascular endothelial growth factor polymorphism differences in diabetic and diabetic retinopathy patients. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 23, 58 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: