Skip to main content

Molecular and environmental characterization of Noonan syndrome in Morocco reveals a significant association with consanguinity and advanced parental age

Abstract

Background

Noonan syndrome (NS) is one of the most common RASopathies, with an autosomal dominant inheritance. This disorder is caused by a range of genes belonging to the RAS-MAP kinase (rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/mitogen-activated protein kinases) pathway, with PTPN11 (protein-tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11) being the most involved genetic factor.

The aim of this study is to report PTPN11 mutations found in a cohort of Moroccans with Noonan syndrome, compare the mutation rate with various studies, and statistically assess involvement of prominent risk factors in manifestation of this disorder.

Thirty-one NS patients were screened for PTPN11 mutations using PCR-Sanger sequencing method. Pathogenic effect prediction, for detected variants, was carried out using PROVEAN, MutationTaster2, and HSF programs. Statistical tests were performed with R software. Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used in percentage comparisons, while Student’s test was used in average comparisons.

Results

We detected five pathogenic mutations, one synonymous variant with a potential altering effect on splicing function, and three novel intronic duplications. PTPN11 mutation rate in our cohort is around 16.13%. Comparison of this rate with the corresponding rates in various populations shows notably significant differences across continents.

Conclusions

Besides genetic factors, the present study suggests involvement of additional environmental factors. Statistical assessment of clinical data confirms particularly the association of NS manifestation with consanguinity and advanced paternal age, and suggests an eventual implication of advanced maternal age as well.

Background

Noonan syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder, with an incidence of 1/1000–2500 of live births, which makes it one of the common genetic disorders. The most frequent features characterizing Noonan syndrome are facial dysmorphia (hypertelorism, ptosis, epicanthal folds, low-set posteriorly rotated ears, short, or webbed neck), short stature, congenital heart disease (pulmonary stenosis, septal defects), and skeletal defects (cubitus valgus, pectus excavatum), besides hematological, genito-urinary, and neurological anomalies [1].

Noonan syndrome belongs to RASopathies set that includes leopard syndrome, cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome, and Costello syndrome among others. RASopathies are mainly caused by mutations in RAS-MAP kinase (rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/mitogen-activated protein kinases) pathway genes. The most involved genes are PTPN11, SOS1, RAF1, KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, HRAS, SHOC2, CBL, and MEK1 159 [2, 3].

Almost half of Noonan syndrome mutations are clustered in PTPN11 (protein-tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11) [OMIM 176876]. This gene encodes SHP-2 protein, which is composed of N-amino terminal src-homology 2 domain (N-SH2), phosphotyrosine phosphatase domain (PTP), and C-amino terminal src-homology 2 domain (C-SH2) [3].

In this paper, we, first, expose results of PTPN11 (hotspot exons) mutation screening in a Moroccan cohort with Noonan syndrome, discuss pathogenic impact of detected variants, and compare our mutation rate to a wide range of studies from all over the world. Then, in a second part, we statistically assess the relationship of our NS cohort with prominent risk factors, such as advanced paternal age and consanguinity.

Methods

Subjects

Thirty-one patients with Noonan syndrome were enrolled from Medical Genetics and Pediatrics Departments between January 2009 and December 2015. Included patients were selected according to the updated Van Der Burgt criteria [4]. Patients were clinically assessed in Medical Genetics Department, and addressed to Cardio-Pediatrics Unit for Echocardiography. Informed consent was obtained, and personal data and familial history were noted for each patient. Subjects with chromosomal abnormalities were excluded. This study was approved by the local ethic committee (ref. 06/14).

Genetic screening

Blood samples were collected, and genomic DNAs were extracted from leukocytes using GeneCatcher Magnetic Beads Kit (Invitrogen). Seven hotspot exons of PTPN11 gene were amplified using PCR standard protocol and previously reported primer pairs [5]. Coding regions and exon-intron junctions of exons 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, and 13 were directly sequenced using the BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (ABI Prism), and analyzed by the 3500Dx Genetic Analyzer v2.3 and the SeqA v5.4 software (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were then aligned via NCBI Nucleotide BLAST tool.

Predictional analysis

In silico prediction analysis was carried out to assess functional impact of identified variants. For this purpose, we used PROVEAN v1.1 [6, 7] and MutationTaster2 [8] programs in case of non-synonymous variants, and HSF v3.0 program [9] in case of synonymous or intronic variants.

Statistical analysis

Clinical findings were compared with either previous studies or a random cohort of 29 healthy families questioned for this purpose. Demographic data of these control families match those of the affected group, with sex ratios, geographical origins, and children average ages statistically overlapping. Moreover, the obtained mutational rate in PTPN11 hotspot exons was compared to the corresponding rates from different populations. Percentage comparisons were performed using the Fisher exact and Pearson chi-square tests, while average comparisons were done with Student’s test. These tests were carried out using the R software.

Results

Clinical finding

The studied population is composed of 14 females (45.2%) and 17 males (54.8%). The age range of diagnosed patients was between 1 month and 17 years. Congenital heart disease is observed in 84%. The most frequent subtype is pulmonary valvular stenosis, observed in 71.4% of cases, followed by atrial septal defect seen in 23.8%, while the least observed cardiac phenotype in our cohort seems to be dilated cardiomyopathy (4.7%). The consanguinity rate is around 36%, whereas the average age of patient mothers and fathers at birth is 31 and 40 years, respectively. No abnormal information was noticed from personal or family history. Further details are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical features of patients and mutated populations

Molecular finding

In the present work, we screened 31 patients affected by Noonan syndrome for PTPN11 hotspot exon mutations. Sanger sequencing allowed us to detect nine different heterozygous variants, spread as follows: four missense variants found in five patients, one synonymous variant detected in one patient carrying also a missense variant, three novel intronic duplications found in four patients, and one recurrent intronic variant detected in five patients. Figures 1 and 2 and Table 2 show more details about these variants.

Fig. 1
figure1

Localization (a) and sequencing profiles (b) of identified PTPN11 exonic variants

Fig. 2
figure2

Sequencing profiles of the identified PTPN11 intronic duplications c.525+129_525+132dup (a), c.525+125_525+132dup (b), and c.525+121_525+132dup (c)

Table 2 Features of identified PTPN11 variants in Noonan population

Functional prediction finding

PROVEAN and MutationTaster2 predicted respectively deleterious and disease causing effects for D61G, Y63C, A72S, and N308S. Table 3 shows the respective obtained scores.

Table 3 Pathogenic effect prediction of PROVEAN and MutationTaster2 programs for PTPN11 missense variants

Human Splicing Finder (HSF) considered the variant H85H as a potential source of splicing alteration, through creating an exonic splicing silencer (ESS) site and breaking an exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) (Fig. 3), while the intronic variants were predicted to have no pathogenic effect on splicing process.

Fig. 3
figure3

Pathogenic effect prediction output of HSF program for synonymous variant His85H

Statistical analysis

The mutation rate obtained in our cohort, from PTPN11 hotspot exon screening, was about 16.13% (5/31). We compared this rate to its analogues in different populations from around the world. Table 4 shows the comparison details.

Table 4 Statistical comparison of PTPN11 hotspot exon mutation rates through worldwide populations

Discussion

In this paper, we report the spectrum of PTPN11 (hotspot exons) mutations in a cohort of 31 patients affected by Noonan syndrome, discuss their pathogenicity, and compare our mutation rate with various populations throughout the world. In a second part, we assess the clinical data of this cohort, in order to figure out any possible association with a particular epigenetic (non-genetic) risk factor.

Molecular and functional prediction finding

We have sequenced seven exons (2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 13) that were proved earlier to host 99.9% of PTPN11 mutations [3], which means that about 1% of mutations might be overlooked in this study. Three of detected mutations (D61G, Y63C, and A72S) are clustered in the most mutated exon (exon 3). This exon encodes a part of N-SH2 domain, which is involved in interaction with upstream proteins, as well as with phosphotyrosine-phosphatase domain (PTP) to ensure SHP2 self-inhibition. N308S is localized in PTP, which is the SHP2 catalytic domain that ensures the dephosphorylation of phosphor-tyrosine residues of targeted proteins, besides its contribution in SHP2 self-inhibition [24].

Multiple alignment of SHP2 sequence with various species shows that the affected amino acids are highly conserved (Fig. 4). Furthermore, according to in silico prediction tools, D61G, Y63C, A72S, and N308S are deleterious or disease causing. It was shown in different studies that these mutations segregate with the phenotype in the affected families, and was not observed in healthy populations.

Fig. 4
figure4

Multiple alignment profile of SHP2 homologs across different species

This pathogenicity is basically related to the position of the affected residues. In fact, mutations located within, or near to, N-SH2-PTP interaction area seem to disrupt the SHP2 inactive conformation, leading to the exposure of PTP catalytic site, and thus a continuously activated protein [24, 33].

Such gain-of-function mutations result in permanent signal transduction through molecular signalization pathway RAS/MAPK (rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/mitogen-activated protein kinase), even in the absence of extra-cell ligand upstream of this pathway.

Since RAS/MAPK is a ubiquitous pathway, involved in proliferation and differentiation of numerous tissues [34, 35], mutation disrupting its function could have a drastic impact on various organs, as it is seen in Noonan syndrome features.

In addition to the identified missense mutations, we detected the synonymous variant H85H (c.255C>T) in patient P28 who carries A72S mutation as well. Human Splicing Finder (HSF) shows that H85H may have a potential altering effect on splicing function through impairing splicing regulation consensus motifs. Such effect could entail a loss of a whole exon during the splicing process, resulting in a non-functional truncated protein. Therefore, it is important to conduct functional studies in that particular case to determine whether the observed phenotype is due to a gain-of-function mutation (A72S) or to a loss-of-function mutation (H85H).

Besides these exonic variants, we have detected three novel duplications located in the intronic region, c.525+129_525+132dup, c.525+125_525+132dup, and c.525+121_525+132dup. These duplications concern ATTT motif (Fig. 2) and seem to be mainly due to the presence of a long series of ATTT tandem repeats at this region. According to HSF program, these duplications, in addition to the fourth intronic variant c.854-21C>T, seem to have no pathogenic effect on splicing.

Statistical finding

According to these findings, the PTPN11 mutation rate in our study is around 16.13% (5/31). In order to check out the putative involvement of additional environmental factors, we proceeded to the comparison of our rate with those of different populations from all over the world (Table 4).

Our rate seems to be statistically close to rates of North-African and most of European populations. A significant difference was seen between our rate and all American and most of Asian studies.

The lowest rates are seen in the African countries, 4.7–31.6%. The ranges of rates in European and Asian populations are higher, respectively 23–59.6% and 27.1–55.6%, while the highest levels are reported in American studies, with rates set between 42 and 50.7%.

In a second step, in order to determine whether these differences are significant or not, we compared, on the one hand, the rates of countries belonging to the same continent with each other, and on the other hand, we compared combined rates of different continents with each other.

The performed comparisons show predominance of statistically close rates between populations from the same continent, and significant differences between most populations belonging to different continents, as well as between continental combined rates.

These variations in PTPN11 mutation rates throughout geographical regions suggest the involvement of, besides genetic factors, further ethnical and/or environmental factors, which widely vary across populations, and may include, among others, the following:

  • Eating habits, such as healthy dietary habits in Mediterranean and Asian regions

  • Sociocultural and/or religious convictions related to restriction of tobacco and alcohol consumption (i.e., Muslim communities) and favored consanguineous marriages (i.e., tribalist communities)

  • Industrialization of countries resulting in more industrialized food, exposure to polluted air, and unhealthy lifestyle in urban zones of developed countries

Clinical findings

In order to best characterize these environmental factors in our NS cohort, we proceeded to the statistical assessment of available data related notably to consanguinity and parental age at proband birth (Table 1), in comparison either with previous studies or with a Moroccan cohort from general population that we interrogated for this purpose.

The average age of included patients at diagnosis was 6.5 years with a median of 5 years. Sex ratio of our cohort is around 1.2, meaning a higher incidence among males. This seems to be consistent with previous studies [14, 36].

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is present in 50 to 90% of NS cases [37,38,39]. In our study, 84% of subjects have CHD, with a predominance of pulmonary valvular stenosis, observed in 71.4% of subjects, followed by atrial septal defect, then cardiomyopathy which is consistent with previous studies, though some of them reported more, or as many, cardiomyopathies as ASD among Noonan syndrome patients [4, 40, 41].

Consanguinity was noticed in 36% of patients. This rate seems to be quite high compared to that reported in the Moroccan general population, which is set around 15.25% [42]. The significant difference (p = 0.01) puts the consanguinity among the prominent risk factors of NS occurrence.

The averages of paternal and maternal ages at proband pregnancy, in our study, are 40 and 31 years, respectively. These values were compared with the corresponding averages of a group of 29 mothers and fathers chosen randomly from general population, which are 26 and 33 years, respectively. Comparisons show significant differences in both cases, with p values of 0.03 and 0.01, respectively. Moreover, in our NS-mutated population, paternal ages were interestingly further higher. Paternal age ranges indeed between 30 and 49 with an average of 38 years and a median of 39 years, which seems to be particularly higher than that found in the study of Tartaglia et al., in which they found that the average paternal age of NS patient births (35.6 years) is significantly higher than the general population analyzed in their study [36]. These findings confirm, on the one hand, the association of advanced paternal age to higher risk of Noonan syndrome occurrence among offspring and suggest, on the other hand, the possible involvement of advanced maternal age as well.

It is worth to mention that the main limitation of the present study is the small size of the studied population. Moreover, due to unavailability of parent DNAs, we could not assess the inheritance pattern of identified variants.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this work allowed us to identify the pathogenic missense mutations D61G, Y63C, A72S, and N308S, and three novel intronic duplications related to excessive ATTT tandem repeats (c.525+129_525+132dup, c.525+125_525+132dup, and c.525+121_525+132dup), in addition to the synonymous variant H85H that seems to have a potential altering effect on splicing function. The latter variant was detected along with the gain-of-function mutation A72S in the same patient, which needs more investigation to determine the actual molecular cause of the observed phenotype. This study shows that PTPN11 pathogenic mutations are responsible of about 16% of our NS cohort, and that PTPN11 mutation rates vary significantly across continent, suggesting a potential involvement of environmental factors besides genetic factors. Furthermore, the present study emphasizes particularly the significant association of consanguinity and advanced paternal age with Noonan syndrome manifestation, and suggests, for the first time, the possible involvement of advanced maternal age as well.

Finally, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that takes into consideration most of the previous studies arising from around the world, and compares their mutation rates, which allowed providing preliminary evidence for the potential co-involvement of environmental factors (besides genetic etiology), and this through highlighting the statistically significant differences of mutation rates across geographical regions. A stronger epidemiological study should, obviously, be conducted afterward in a large cohort, in order to confirm these preliminary results and thoroughly study the environmental etiology.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CHD:

Congenital heart disease

ESE:

Exonic splicing enhancer

ESS:

Exonic splicing silencer

HSF:

Human Splicing Finder

NS:

Noonan syndrome

N-SH2:

Amino-terminal src-homology 2

PTP:

Protein-tyrosine phosphatase

PTPN11:

Protein-tyrosine phosphatase, non-receptor type 11

RAS-MAP kinase:

Rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog/mitogen-activated protein kinases

SHP2:

Non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase 2

References

  1. 1.

    Allanson JE. Noonan syndrome. In: Cassidy, SB; Allanson J, editor. Management of genetic syndromes. Wiley-Blac. 2010. p. 569–86

  2. 2.

    Tartaglia M, Gelb BD, Zenker M (2011) Noonan syndrome and clinically related disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 25(1):161–179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    El Bouchikhi I, Belhassan K, Zohra F, Iraqui M, Bouguenouch L, Samri I et al (2016) Noonan syndrome-causing genes: molecular update and an assessment of the mutation rate. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med 3(4):133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Bhambhani V, Muenke M (2014) Noonan syndrome. Am Fam Physician 89(1):37–43

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tartaglia M, Kalidas K, Shaw A, Song X, Musat DL, Van der Burgt I et al (2002) PTPN11 mutations in Noonan syndrome: molecular spectrum, genotype-phenotype correlation, and phenotypic heterogeneity. Am J Hum Genet 70(6):1555–1563

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Choi Y, Sims GE, Murphy S, Miller JR, Chan A (2012) Predicting the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. PLoS One 7(10):e46688

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Choi Y. A fast computation of pairwise sequence alignment scores between a protein and a set of single-locus variants of another protein. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine (BCB ‘12). ACM. N Y; 2012. p. 414–7

  8. 8.

    Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D (2014) MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 11(4):361–362

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Beroud G, Claustres M, Beroud C (2009) Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 37:e67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Essawi ML, Ismail MF, Afifi HH, Kobesiy MM, El Kotoury A, Barakat MM (2013) Mutational analysis of the PTPN11 gene in Egyptian patients with Noonan syndrome. J Formos Med Assoc 112(11):707–712

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Louati R, Abdelmoula NB, Trabelsi I, Abid D, Lissewski C, Kharrat N et al (2014) Clinical and molecular findings of Tunisian patients with RASopathies. Mol Syndromol 5(5):212–217

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Şimşek-Kiper P, Alanay Y, Gülhan B, Lissewski C, Türkyilmaz D, Alehan D et al (2013) Clinical and molecular analysis of RASopathies in a group of Turkish patients. Clin Genet 83(2):181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Derbent M, Oncel Y, Tokel K, Varan B, Haberal A, YaziCi AC et al (2010) Clinical and hematologic findings in Noonan syndrome patients with PTPN11 gene mutations. Am J Med Genet Part A 152(11):2768–2774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jongmans M, Sistermans EA, Rikken A, Nillesen WM, Tamminga R, Patton M et al (2005) Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of Noonan syndrome: new data and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet 134 A(2):165–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Sarkozy A, Conti E, Seripa D, Digilio M, Grifone N, Tandoi C et al (2003) Correlation between PTPN11 gene mutations and congenital heart defects in Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes. J Med Genet 40:704–708

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ferrero GB, Baldassarre G, Delmonaco AG, Biamino E, Banaudi E, Carta C et al (2008) Clinical and molecular characterization of 40 patients with Noonan syndrome. Eur J Med Genet [Internet] 51(6):566–572 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2008.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Papadopoulou A, Issakidis M, Gole E, Kosma K, Fryssira H, Fretzayas A et al (2012) Phenotypic spectrum of 80 Greek patients referred as Noonan syndrome and PTPN11 mutation analysis: the value of initial clinical assessment. Eur J Pediatr 171(1):51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Binder G, Neuer K, Ranke MB, Wittekindt NE (2005) PTPN11 mutations are associated with mild growth hormone resistance in individuals with Noonan syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(9):5377–5381

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zenker M, Buheitel G, Rauch R, Koenig R, Bosse K, Kress W et al (2004) Genotype-phenotype correlations in Noonan syndrome. J Pediatr 144:368–374

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Musante L, Kehl HG, Majewski F, Meinecke P, Schweiger S, Gillessen-Kaesbach G et al (2003) Spectrum of mutations in PTPN11 and genotype - phenotype correlation in 96 patients with Noonan syndrome and five patients with cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 11(2):201–206

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ferreira LV, Souza SAL, Arnhold IJP, Mendonca BB, Jorge AAL (2005) PTPN11 (protein tyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 11) mutations and response to growth hormone therapy in children with Noonan syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(9):5156–5160

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bertola DR, Pereira AC, Albano LMJ, De Oliveira PSL, Kim CA, Krieger JE (2006) PTPN11 gene analysis in 74 Brazilian patients with Noonan syndrome or Noonan-like phenotype. Genet Test 10(3):186–191

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pierpont EI, Pierpont ME, Mendelsohn NJ, Roberts AE, Tworog-Dube E, Seidenberg MS (2009) Genotype differences in cognitive functioning in Noonan syndrome. Genes, Brain Behav 8(3):275–282

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tartaglia M, Mehler EL, Goldberg R, Zampino G, Brunner HG, Kremer H et al (2001) Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 29(4):465–468

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hung CS, Lin JL, Lee YJ, Lin SP, Chao MC, Lo FS (2007) Mutational analysis of PTPN11 gene in Taiwanese children with Noonan syndrome. J Formos Med Assoc [Internet] 106(2):169–172 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60235-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kosaki K, Suzuki T, Muroya K, Hasegawa T, Sato S, Matsuo N et al (2002) PTPN11 (proteintyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor-type 11) mutations in seven Japanese patients with Noonan syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:3529–3533

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Niihori T, Aoki Y, Ohashi H, Kurosawa K, Kondoh T, Ishikiriyama S et al (2005) Functional analysis of PTPN11/SHP-2 mutants identified in Noonan syndrome and childhood leukemia. J Hum Genet 50(4):192–202

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yoshida R, Hasegawa T, Hasegawa Y, Nagai T, Kinoshita E, Tanaka Y et al (2004) Protein-tyrosine phosphatase, nonreceptor type 11 mutation analysis and clinical assessment in 45 patients with Noonan syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(7):3359–3364

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Choi JH, Lee BH, Jung CW, Kim YM, Jin HY, Kim JM et al (2012) Response to growth hormone therapy in children with Noonan syndrome: correlation with or without PTPN11 gene mutation. Horm Res Paediatr 77(6):388–393

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lee BH, Kim JM, Jin HY, Kim GH, Choi JH, Yoo HW (2011) Spectrum of mutations in Noonan syndrome and their correlation with phenotypes. J Pediatr [Internet] 159(6):1029–1035 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lee ST, Ki CS, Lee HJ (2007) Mutation analysis of the genes involved in the Ras-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in Korean patients with Noonan syndrome. Clin Genet 72(2):150–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ko JM, Kim JM, Kim GH, Yoo HW (2008) PTPN11, SOS1, KRAS, and RAF1 gene analysis, and genotype-phenotype correlation in Korean patients with Noonan syndrome. J Hum Genet 53(11–12):999–1006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Hof P, Pluskey S, Dhe-Paganon S, Eck MJ, Shoelson S (1998) Crystal structure of the tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2. Cell. 92:441–450

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Tamir I, Dal Porto JM, Cambier J (2000) Cytoplasmic protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 and SHP-2: regulators of B cell signal transduction. Curr Opin Immunol 12:307–315

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Feng G (1999) Shp-2 tyrosine phosphatase: signaling one cell or many. Exp Cell Res 253:47–54

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Tartaglia M, Cordeddu V, Chang H, Shaw A, Kalidas K, Crosby A et al (2004) Paternal germline origin and sex-ratio distortion in transmission of PTPN11 mutations in Noonan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 75(3):492–497

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Allanson J (1987) Noonan syndrome. J Med Genet 24:9–13

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Patton M (1994) Noonan syndrome: a review. Growth Genet Horm 33(10):1–3

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Shaw AC, Kalidas K, Crosby AH, Jeffery S, Patton M (2007) The natural history of Noonan syndrome: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Dis Child 92:128–132

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Jorge AAL, Malaquias AC, Arnhold IJP, Mendonca BB (2009) Noonan syndrome and related disorders: a review of clinical features and mutations in genes of the RAS/MAPK pathway. Horm Res 71(4):185–193

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Allanson, JE; Roberts A. Noonan syndrome. In: Adam, MP; Ardinger, HH; Pagon R et al., editor. Gene Reviews. University. Washington, Seattle [2001, updated]; 2019. p. 1–36

  42. 42.

    Jaouad IC, Elalaoui SC, Sbiti A, Elkerh F, Belmahi L, Sefiani A (2009) Consanguineous marriages in Morocco and the consequence for the incidence of autosomal recessive disorders. J Biosoc Sci 41(5):575–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients and their families for their participation in this study.

Funding

This work was financially supported by Hassan II University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez, University of Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah, Morocco. The funders had no role in any aspect of the study (neither in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; nor in the writing of the manuscript).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The conception and supervision of study were done by IEB, MIH, SA, and KO. The research techniques were contributed by IEB, FA, and FZM. The analysis and interpretation of data were participated by IEB and MIH. The writing of paper was performed by IEB. The critical review was done by FZM. The healthy cohort enrollment and questioning were done by IEB and MAM. The clinical assessments were done by LB, IS, KB, and SA. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ihssane El Bouchikhi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the local ethics committee entitled “Comité d’éthique de la Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie et du CHU Hassan II de Fès” (located in the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Fez) under the reference ID: ref. 06/14. Written informed consent was obtained from the participating patients or their tutors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Bouchikhi, I., Bouguenouch, L., Moufid, F.Z. et al. Molecular and environmental characterization of Noonan syndrome in Morocco reveals a significant association with consanguinity and advanced parental age. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 21, 6 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43042-020-0047-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Noonan syndrome (NS)
  • PTPN11 mutations
  • Pathogenic effect prediction
  • Mutation rate
  • Consanguinity
  • Paternal age
  • Moroccan population
  • Maternal age