Skip to main content

Association of maternal genetic polymorphisms with fetal growth restriction syndrome in Russian pregnant women from Rostov region



Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is one of the main syndromes causing fetal morbidity and mortality. It was known to be associated with different factors including maternal, fetal, and environmental. However, the effect of genetic factors in FGR is not totally understood. Recently, researchers have focused on investigating genetic variants as possible markers of FGR. This especially concerns maternal genetic polymorphisms since they could serve as prenatal prognostic biomarkers. Accordingly, we aimed to study the association of several polymorphisms affecting vital processes of pregnancy with FGR in pregnant women. Targeted polymorphisms include methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C > T; methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) 66A > G; methionine synthase (MTR) 2756A > G; angiotensinogen (AGT) 704 T > C; and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) 634C > G. In addition, this study examined SNP–SNP interactions, linkage disequilibrium (LD), and haplotypes association for these polymorphisms in the studied population.


According to our data, MTRR 66(GG) carriers had increased FGR risk (OR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.31–7.72) while (AG) genotype was associated with lower FGR risk (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.84). AGT 704T > C also showed significant association with FGR with allele (T) as a risk factor. SNP–SNP interactions analysis revealed antagonistic relationship between these two polymorphisms and haplotypes association confirmed this finding. High LD possibility was shown between MTHFR 677C > T and MTR 2756A > G (D′ = 0.999) located on chromosome 1.


We suggest MTRR 66A > G and AGT 704T > C as associated with FGR susceptibility with antagonistic interaction. Result will help to expand our understanding of FGR as a multifactorial syndrome and improve prenatal prognosis using maternal genetic biomarkers, but further studies in different populations are needed to confirm findings.


Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a fetal syndrome in which fetus growth parameters are not consistent with normal ranges of the same gestational age [17]. This syndrome can be defined as a prenatal period accompanied with slowdown, arrest, or negative dynamics of fetal size which clinically includes pregnancies with fetal body weight < 10th percentile (or ≤ 2 or more standard deviations) of normal weight detected for gestational age and sex [26]. FGR affects approximately 7–15% of pregnancies all over the world and six times higher in underdeveloped countries. It is known to be associated with prenatal and postnatal outcomes with a mortality of 12% in fetal and 8% in neonatal period [14, 18]. FGR short-term complications include respiratory distress, perinatal asphyxia, hypoglycemia, and others. Moreover, later in life, patients showed increased risk of cognitive and neurodevelopmental abnormalities, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, and even metabolic syndromes [3]. Hence, developing our understanding about this syndrome is very important to improve pediatric outcomes.

Three main factors were known to contribute in FGR etiology: placental, maternal, and fetal (intrauterine) factors, but many studies used to call them risk factors since their effects in FGR are not fully understood [26]. Though etiology is not fully understood, placental insufficiency was proved as the direct causal factor in most FGR cases. Moreover, it is known that genetic expression of genes regulating placental angiogenesis and nutrients transition from mother to fetus leads to abnormal placental functions and thereby abnormal fetal growth [9]. Recently, researchers have focused on the genetic aspects of FGR syndrome, especially maternal candidate genetic variants associated with its risk. So far, possible effects of several polymorphisms on FGR pathophysiology were widely studied in different populations, but results are contradictory [16]. Finding new maternal biomarkers will improve prenatal diagnosis and prognosis and thus treatment or even prevention. Therefore, more studies are needed to investigate maternal polymorphisms of genes involved in FGR development.

This study aimed to investigate the association of five candidate genetic variants with FGR risk in pregnant women from Rostov region. In addition, research includes haplotypes and gene–gene interactions analysis to identify the possible prenatal biomarkers of this syndrome whether it is a single polymorphism, haplotype, or a set of genetic variants.

Materials and methods

Research subjects

From March 2018 to April 2021, pregnant women (mean age ± SD = 30.18 ± 5.28 years) were recruited in this case–control study to investigate targeted genetic polymorphisms. Samples were collected in “Perinatal Center” State institution of Rostov oblast, Russia. Then, multiple pregnancies, fetal chromosomal aberrations, twins’ pregnancy, and induced pregnancy (in vitro fertilization) were excluded from the study. Study subjects (n = 103) were classified according to diagnosis into two groups: FGR pregnancy (n = 46) and controls corresponding normal pregnancy without any complications (n = 57). The diagnosis was made according to ultrasound and Doppler ultrasound.

FGR was defined as estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) < 3rd centile, or EFW or AC < 10th centile and umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) > 95th centile or cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) < 5th centile, diagnosed after 32 weeks [10, 21].

All participants provided willingly written informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and approved by the Southern Federal University Bioethics Committee.

DNA extraction

Blood samples were collected at an average of 29 weeks of pregnancy into purple top EDTA tubes and then stored at − 80 °C. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes by standard procedures using commercially available kits: NK-sorbent «Base»; (Lytech Co. Ltd., Russia) and «DNA-EXTRAN»; (Syntol Co. Ltd., Russia). The isolated DNA was quantitatively assessed using NanoDrop and then stored at − 20 °C.

Targeted polymorphisms

In this study, five polymorphisms were targeted: MTHFR 677C > T; MTRR 66A > G; MTR 2756A > G; AGT 704 T > C; and VEGFA 634C > G. Table 1 illustrates the following information about every targeted polymorphism: the affected gene and amino acid substitution; chromosomal location; function of encoded protein under the normal level of genetic expression; and the effect of mutant allele existence on genetic and protein function.

Table 1 Amino acids substitution, normal genetic function, chromosomal location, and effects on genetic expression of the five studied polymorphisms


Real-time allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (AS-PCR) assay was used to determine: MTHFR 677C > T (rs1801133); MTRR 66A > G (rs1801394); MTR 2756A > G (rs1805087); and AGT 704 T > C (rs699) with SYBR-Green fluorescence label. This was done using commercially available genotyping kits for those polymorphisms: SNP-Express RT kit (Lytech Co. Ltd., Russia). Results automatically were registered on QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. For PCR amplification, the standard program used was as follows: one initial denaturation step of 1 min at 93 °C; followed by 35 cycles of 10 s at 93 °C (denaturation), 10 s at 64 °C (annealing), and 20 s at 72 °C (extension). Melt curves and amplification plots for each genetic variation were checked to confirm specificity and accuracy of the used kit.

For VEGFA 634C > G (rs2010963), allele-specific PCR was conducted with SNP- Express EF kit (Lytech Co. Ltd., Russia) using the same amplificatory system (QuantStudio™ 5) with an initial denaturation temperature of 93 °C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles of 93 °C for 10 s (denaturation), 64 °C for 10 s (annealing), and 72 °C for 20 s (extension) with a final extension step of 72 °C for 1 min. PCR products were then analyzed with gel electrophoresis using a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide on a UV transilluminator.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using free portal «medical statistics» (Kazan, Russia) ( Comparisons in qualitative parameters between FGR pregnancies and controls were made by using independent t-test, and results were presented as mean ± SD. The difference in those parameters between studied groups was evaluated by calculating P value (< 0.05 was considered as statistically significant). Genotypes were checked for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium using Chi-square test in an available online calculator [22]. Chi-squared tests were performed to examine the differences in alleles frequency and genotypes distribution of every studied polymorphism in FGR and control pregnancies. Odds ratios (OR) [with 95% confidence interval (CI)] were calculated to measure the association with FGR risk in both groups. OR greater than 1 was considered a positive association (risk effect) whereas OR values less than 1 indicated negative association (protective effect). Statistical significance was assumed for P values < 0.05.

To investigate the interactions between targeted polymorphisms, multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) algorithm was used. MDR is model-free and non-parametric that uses delineate multiple factors to identify high-dimensional interactions, with the assumption that the level of risk is mainly explained by genetic factors; it is, therefore, ideal to study gene–gene interactions [22]. The following parameters were chosen for MDR analysis: attributes number: 5; cross-validation count: 10; and track top models: 500. In addition, as a correction for small sample size, Fisher's exact test was selected to be used in MDR.

Linkage disequilibrium and haplotypes association with FGR

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) was evaluated for polymorphisms located on the same chromosome using SNPStats software ( This included: AGT 704T > C, MTR 2756A > G, and MTHFR 677C > T. For those three polymorphisms, LD coefficient (D′) was calculated to evaluate the possibility of recombination. Generally, D′ = 1 indicates complete LD and thus no evidence of recombination between the two sites, while D′ = 0 indicates no LD. In this study, we considered that D′ > 0.80 indicates strong LD.

To study haplotypes association with FGR risk, the most common haplotype was selected as the reference. P-values, odds ratios, and 95% CI were calculated to estimate the degree of association between haplotypes and the FGR risk in SNPStats. P values < 0.05 were considered as an indicator of significant association.


Characteristics of study groups

Maternal blood samples were collected from FGR-diagnosed (aged 20–38 years) and healthy pregnant women (aged 18–43 years). There was no significant difference in age between the two studied groups (P > 0.05). Samples were collected after confirming pregnancy state. FGR was diagnosed at the following pregnancy weeks: 24w (one case), 27w (one case), 29w (three cases), 30w (two cases), 31w (three cases), 32w (five cases), 33w (eight cases), 34w (two cases), 35w (six cases), and 36w (five cases) with an average of 33.8 pregnancy weeks. It should be mentioned that 10 cases were with late delivery, and FGR was diagnosed at 37w (seven cases) and even 38w (three cases). Gestational and maternal age of the study groups are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 The maternal and gestational age at sampling point of FGR and normal pregnancy groups

Genotypes and alleles frequencies in both studied groups

Genotype and allele frequencies for MTHFR 677C > T (rs1801133); MTRR 66A > G (rs1801394); MTR 2756A > G (rs1805087); AGT 704T > C (rs699); and VEGFA 634C > G (rs2010963) polymorphisms in healthy controls and FGR pregnancies are shown in Table 3. Genotypes frequencies were all in accordance with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for both groups (Table 3).

Table 3 Genotype and allele frequencies of the five studied polymorphisms in FGR and controls

Association of alleles and genotypes frequency with FGR

Among the five studied polymorphisms, MTRR 66A > G (rs1801394) and AGT 704T > C (rs699) showed a significant association with FGR risk (P value = 0.025 and 0.049, respectively). For MTRR 66A > G, (GG) carriers had increased FGR risk (OR = 3.18, 95% CI 1.31–7.72). Moreover, (AG) genotype was associated with lower FGR risk (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.84). According to our data, AGT 704T > C major and minor alleles have significant effect on FGR development, with (T) as a risk factor (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.002–3.17) and (C) as a protective one (OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.32–1). In the study population, MTHFR 677C > T (rs1801133); MTR 2756A > G (rs1805087); and VEGFA 634C > G showed no differences in alleles or genotypes frequency between FGR and controls (Table 4).

Table 4 Association of five studied polymorphisms with FGR susceptibility

SNP–SNP interaction of targeted polymorphisms

MDR analysis was conducted to evaluate possible interactions of the five targeted polymorphisms. Results showed two significant models (P < 0.05): VEGFA 634C > G, MTRR 66A > G, and AGT 704T > C three-locus model and four-locus model VEGFA 634C > G; MTRR 66A > G; AGT 704T > C; and MTR 2756A > G. Table 5 shows balance accuracy and cross-validation consistency (CVC) of each model.

Table 5 Best predictive gene–gene interaction models identified by MDR analysis

According to the Fruchterman–Rheingold scheme, out of the five analyzed polymorphisms, MTRR 66A > G has the highest predictive potential, which supports the previous results of polymorphisms association shown in Table 4. The most effective intergenic interaction is VEGFA 634C > G with AGT 704T > C (the highest phenotypic entropy), representing a synergistic effect of these two polymorphisms in FGR pathogenesis. In addition, synergism was observed between VEGFA 634C > G and MTRR 66A > G, which support the significant three-locus model (Table 5). As shown in Fig. 1, a weak synergism was also found between AGT 704T > C and MTHFR 677C > T. Beside synergism, MTR 2756A > G antagonistic interactions were suggested with VEGFA 634C > G and AGT 704T > C. Moreover, MTRR 66A > G revealed antagonistic relationship with AGT 704T > C. Dendrogram (Fig. 1a) and Fruchterman–Rheingold scheme (Fig. 1b) represent all types of interactions according to MDR.

Fig. 1
figure 1

High-order gene–gene interaction analysis for MTHFR 677C > T; MTRR 66A > G; MTR 2756A > G; AGT 235Met > Thr; and VEGFA 634C > G (data obtained by multifactor dimensionality reduction): a interaction dendrogram and b Fruchterman–Rheingold scheme

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis

Because of their chromosomal location (on chromosome 1), pairwise LD was analyzed between AGT 704T > C, MTR 2756A > G, and MTHFR 677C > T. According to SNPStats analysis, D′ of AGT 704T > C and MTR 2756A > G was 0.023, D′ of AGT 704T > C and MTHFR 677C > T was 0.4 which indicates no LD. On the other hand, D′ between MTR 2756A > G and MTHFR 677C > T was 0.999 indicating a strong LD possibility and no evidence of recombination between these two sites.

Haplotypes association with FGR risk

Using SNPStats software, a pairwise haplotype association analysis was conducted for all the five studied polymorphisms. Results showed four haplotypes significantly associated with FGR risk represented in Table 6. Haplotypes containing MTHFR 677T * MTRR 66A and MTR 2756G * VEGFA 634C were associated with a statistically increased FGR risk while those with MTRR 66G * AGT 704T and AGT 704T * VEGFA 634G were associated with a statistically decreased risk.

Table 6 Haplotype analysis on association of MTHFR 677C > T; MTRR 66A > G; MTR 2756A > G; AGT 704T > C; and VEGFA 634C > G with FGR risk


FGR is considered as a major cause of fetal mortality and morbidity. It is a multifactorial syndrome in which several maternal mechanisms were known to play a critical role, such as folate metabolism, angiogenesis, and many others [4]. After a detailed scan of scientific literature concerning genetic and psychology aspects of FGR, we aimed to target the genetic variations modulating expression of main proteins in vital process that is known to affect fetal growth during pregnancy. In this study, the most common targeted genetic variants affecting folate metabolism (methionine cycle particularly) were investigated in association with FGR risk. Two other candidate polymorphisms were also studied including AGT 704T > C and VEGFA 634C > G since they affect placental perfusion and angiogenesis, respectively.

Folate is one of the most important micronutrients during pregnancy since it provides the one-carbon units for homocysteine (Hcy) remethylation to methionine. High levels of homocysteine are known to be associated with several pregnancy complications due to different mechanisms [11]. Accordingly, the previous researches have studied genetic variations of folate metabolism enzymes in many fetal and pregnancy syndromes, but studies concerning their association particularly with FGR are limited and inconsistent [27].

According to our data, among the three studied polymorphisms affecting those enzymes (MTHFR 677C > T; MTRR 66A > G; and MTR 2756A > G), only MTRR 66A > G showed a significant association with FGR risk. We figured that MTRR 66(GG) has a significant association with increased FGR risk since it was more than two times frequent among FGR cases (43.2%) compared to controls (19.6%). MTRR is responsible for converting methionine synthase into the active status (as shown in Table 1). Its gene is located at 5p15.2–p15.3 with the most frequent polymorphism at position 66 causing a substitution of methionine to isoleucine at codon 22 [7]. The figured role of MTRR 66GG as a possible FGR risk factor can be explained by the fact that this genotype was known to be associated with decreased enzymatic activity leading to higher homocysteine concentration and DNA methylation [15]. Increased maternal homocysteine levels are associated with various vascular-related complications of pregnancy including FGR (D'Souza and Glazier 6). It is also known that mid-pregnancy elevated maternal homocysteine has independent effect on placenta-mediated pregnancy complications including FGR [2].

To our knowledge, this is the first study to show MTRR 66(AG) genotype as a protective factor against FGR risk. It could be suggested that the presence of the allele (A) in heterozygotes somehow mitigates the effect of allele (G) and provides the optimal level of MTRR genetic expression for fetal growth. The previous results are consistent with the fact that MTRR 66GG is associated with pregnancy complications, such as recurrent spontaneous abortion [13, 24]. However, less studies concerned its association particularly with FGR and instead focused mainly on MTHFR 677C > T. Most of these studies confirmed MTHFR 677TT as associated with a higher FGR risk which our data have not shown probably due to population and ethnicity differences. Moreover, in contrast with our results, Vaughn et al. [25] found that existence of MTRR 66GG can aggravate the effects of MTHFR 677TT (see [15]).

Another polymorphism showed a significant association with FGR risk is AGT 235Met > Thr. This gene encodes angiotensinogen, the angiotensin precursor, and renin substrate in renin–angiotensin system (RAS) responsible for blood pressure maintaining. The main polymorphism of AGT, located on chromosome 1 (lq42–43), represents a single-base substitution of thymine (T) at the second exon with cytosine (C) leading to methionine to threonine substitution at position 235 and thus higher level of genetic expression [1]. Because of its effect increasing AGT levels and blood pressure, this polymorphism was studied during pregnancy mainly in association with preeclampsia and hypertension and rarely in association with FGR. This study showed AGT 704T > C mutant allele as associated with lower FGR risk. In contrast with our results, Zhang et al. [28] have proved mutant allele AGT 704C as associated with higher FGR risk and more frequent in idiopathic FGR pregnancies in China. They suggested placental abruption as AGT mechanism of action in FGR (see [5]).

According to our data, AGT 704T allele was associated with higher risk of FGR while the mutant allele (C) was significantly more frequent in normal pregnancies compared to those with FGR diagnosis. MDR analysis of gene–gene interaction supports this result since dendrogram, and Fruchterman–Rheingold scheme revealed antagonistic relationship of MTRR 66A > G with AGT 704T > C. Our finding is supported by the fact that physiologic pregnancy is characterized by an overall upregulation of RAS, increased angiotensinogen production and angiotensin II levels which stimulates aldosterone secretion, causes sodium retention and fluid overload, essential to obtain adequate placental perfusion and thus adequate fetal growth [8]. AGT 235Thr carriers, according to many studies, showed an increase in serum AGT levels by 13–20%. Elevated AGT levels are associated with increased angiotensin II concentrations causing higher RAS activation and thus could be suggested as contributing to appropriate fetal growth minimizing FGR risk [12, 29]. The inconsistency of our results with Zhang et al. [28], mentioned above, could be explained by population heterogeneity since all participants in this study are Caucasians. Future clinical trials on different ethnicities are needed to figure the exact role of AGT polymorphism in FGR.

We have also analyzed the LD between the three targeted genes AGT 704T > C, MTR 2756A > G, and MTHFR 677C > T since they are all located on chromosome 1. MTR 2756A > G and MTHFR showed a high possibility of LD in our population (D′ = 0.999). It could be suggested that women with MTHFR 677C > T mutant allele are with high possibility of being MTR 2756 (G) allele carriers which will negatively affect the function of two folate metabolism enzymes. Thus, we recommend future investigations to ensure this finding.

It should be mentioned that sample size is a limitation of this study. Small sample size resulted from patient inclusion criteria since all patients were diagnosed with FGR as a separated syndrome. Any case of FGR associated with another complication such as preterm birth, preeclampsia, or diabetes was excluded. Further studies with larger sample size are recommended to confirm all our findings.


In conclusion, this study suggests MTRR 66(GG) and AGT 704(T) allele as risk factors of FGR in Rostov region population. On the other hand, MTRR 66(AG) and AGT 704(C) were associated with lower risk of this syndrome and can be considered as protective factors. We have also shown the antagonistic interaction of these two polymorphisms in FGR patients. These findings will help to increase our understanding about genetic aspects of FGR and support the tendency of finding new prenatal prognostic markers and thus improve diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention.

Availability of data and materials

Detailed genotyping data are available on request from the corresponding author. The raw data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.



Fetal growth restriction


Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase


Methionine synthase reductase


Methionine synthase




Vascular endothelial growth factor A


Linkage disequilibrium


  1. Ashour E, Gouda W, Mageed L, Okasha A, Afify M, Fawzi OM (2022) Association of gene polymorphisms of ACE, AGT, and ARNT-like protein 1 with susceptibility to gestational diabetes. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 23(1):59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaudhry SH, Taljaard M, MacFarlane AJ, Gaudet LM, Smith GN, Rodger M, Rennicks White R, Walker MC, Wen SW (2019) The role of maternal homocysteine concentration in placenta-mediated complications: findings from the Ottawa and Kingston birth cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chew LC, Verma RP. Fetal Growth Restriction. [Updated 2022 Jun 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-. Available from:

  4. Dall’Asta A, Stampalija T, Mecacci F, Minopoli M, Schera GB, Cagninelli G, Ottaviani C, Fantasia I, Barbieri M, Lisi F, Simeone S (2022) Ultrasound prediction of adverse perinatal outcome at diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 59(3):342–349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Delforce SJ, Lumbers ER, Ellery SJ, Murthi P, Pringle KG (2019) Dysregulation of the placental renin–angiotensin system in human fetal growth restriction. Reproduction 158(3):237–245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Souza SW, Glazier JD (2022) Homocysteine metabolism in pregnancy and developmental impacts. Front Cell Dev Biol 10:802285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Elderdery AY, Tebein EM, Alenazy FO, Elkhalifa AM, Shalabi MG, Abbas AM, Alhassan HH, Davuljigari CB, Mills J (2022) Impact of methionine synthase reductase polymorphisms in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Genes 13(10):1729.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Forestiero V, Sconfienza E, Mulatero P, Monticone S (2023) Primary aldosteronism in pregnancy. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 24(1):39–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gebremedhn S, Ali A, Hossain M, Hoelker M, Salilew-Wondim D, Anthony RV, Tesfaye D (2021) MicroRNA-mediated gene regulatory mechanisms in mammalian female reproductive health. Int J Mol Sci 22(2):938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, Papageorghiou A, Baschat AA, Baker PN, Silver RM, Wynia K, Ganzevoort W (2016) Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 48(3):333–339.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jankovic-Karasoulos T, Furness DL, Leemaqz SY, Dekker GA, Grzeskowiak LE, Grieger JA, Andraweera PH, McCullough D, McAninch D, McCowan LM, Bianco-Miotto T (2021) Maternal folate, one-carbon metabolism and pregnancy outcomes. Matern Child Nutr 17(1):e13064.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Karjalainen J, Kujala UM, Stolt A, Mäntysaari M, Viitasalo M, Kainulainen K, Kontula K (1999) Angiotensinogen gene M235T polymorphism predicts left ventricular hypertrophy in endurance athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol 34(2):494–499.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin Z, Li Q, Sun Y, Huang J, Wang W, Fu J, Xu J, Zeng D (2019) Interactions between genetic variants involved in the folate metabolic pathway and serum lipid, homocysteine levels on the risk of recurrent spontaneous abortion. Lipids Health Dis 18(1):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lubrano C, Taricco E, Coco C, Di Domenico F, Mandò C, Cetin I (2022) Perinatal and neonatal outcomes in fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age. J Clin Med 11(10):2729.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahmood S, Younas H, Younus A, Nathenial S (2021) A narrative review on the role of folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism and its associated gene polymorphisms in posing risk to preeclampsia. Clin Exp Hypertens 43(6):487–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malyshkina AI, Boiko YLV, Panova IA, Fetisova IN, Voronin DN, Mileeva PL (2019) Interleukin-10 production and secretion in blood in relation to interleukin-10 A-1082G polymorphism in pregnant women with fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 6:40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, Athanasiadis A, Mecacci F, Figueras F, Berghella V, Nazareth A, Tahlak M, McIntyre HD, Costa FD (2021) FIGO (international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 152(Suppl 1):3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Novikova IA, Alset D, Shkurat TP, Pokudina IO, Butenko EV, Kuznetsova NB, Zabanova EA (2021) Maternal energy metabolism and angiogenesis genes polymorphisms in fetal growth restriction. Gene Reports 23:101170.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raghubeer S, Matsha TE (2021) Methylenetetrahydrofolate (MTHFR), the one-carbon cycle, and cardiovascular risks. Nutrients 13(12):4562.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rahimi Z, Zarini MB, Rahimi Z, Shakiba E, Vaisi-Raygani A, Moradi MT, Yari K (2021) Variants of genes involved in metabolism of folate among patients with breast cancer: association of tyms 3r allele with susceptibility to breast cancer and metastasis. Iran J Pathol 16(1):62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V, Słodki M, Khizroeva J, Makatsariya A, D’antonio F (2020) Role of Doppler ultrasound at time of diagnosis of late-onset fetal growth restriction in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 55(6):793–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodriguez S, Gaunt TR, Day IN (2009) Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium testing of biological ascertainment for Mendelian randomization studies. Am J Epidemiol 169(4):505–514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Salimi S, Yaghmaei M, Tabatabaei E, Mokhtari M, Naghavi A (2015) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-634G/C polymorphism was associated with severe pre-eclampsia and lower serum VEGF level. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41(12):1877–1883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Talwar S, Prasad S, Kaur L, Mishra J, Puri M, Sachdeva MP, Saraswathy KN (2022) MTR, MTRR and CBS gene polymorphisms in recurrent miscarriages: a case control study from North India. J Hum Reprod Sci 15(2):191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaughn JD, Bailey LB, Shelnutt KP, Dunwoody KM, Maneval DR, Davis SR, Quinlivan EP, Gregory JF III, Theriaque DW, Kauwell GP (2004) Methionine synthase reductase 66A→ G polymorphism is associated with increased plasma homocysteine concentration when combined with the homozygous methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677C→ T variant. J Nutr 134(11):2985–2990.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Voicu NL, Bohîlţea RE, Berceanu S, Busuioc CJ, Roşu GC, Paitici Ş, Istrate-Ofiţeru AM, Berceanu C, Diţescu D (2020) Evaluation of placental vascularization in thrombophilia and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Rom J Morphol Embryol 61(2):465.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S, Duan Y, Jiang S, Bi Y, Pang X, Liu C, Yang Z, Lai J (2022) Relationships between maternal gene polymorphisms in one carbon metabolism and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a prospective mother and child cohort study in China. Nutrients 14(10):2108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang XQ, Varner M, Dizon-Townson D, Song F, Ward K (2003) A molecular variant of angiotensinogen is associated with idiopathic intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 101(2):237–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang Q, Huang Q, Wang X, Wang Y, Hua X (2022) The effect of polymorphisms (M235T and T174M) on the angiotensinogen gene (AGT) in coronary artery disease in the Eastern Asian population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 101(34):e29911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was performed with the equipment of the Center of collective use «High technologies» (Southern Federal University).


This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FENW-2023-0018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



D.A. performed data input, methodology, statistical analysis, and writing—review and editing; E.V.B. and I.O.P. contributed methodology and review and editing; and E.A.Z. performed samples collection and FGR diagnosis. T.P.S. and N.B.K. were supervisors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dema Alset.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Study design and methods were approved by the Ethics Committee of Southern Federal University. All participants provided willingly written informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alset, D., Butenko, E.V., Pokudina, I.O. et al. Association of maternal genetic polymorphisms with fetal growth restriction syndrome in Russian pregnant women from Rostov region. Egypt J Med Hum Genet 24, 73 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: